Classifying wetland‐related land cover types and habitats using fine‐scale lidar metrics derived from country‐wide Airborne Laser Scanning

Mapping 3D vegetation structure in wetlands is important for conservation and monitoring. Openly accessible country‐wide Airborne Laser Scanning (ALS) data—using light detection and ranging (lidar) technology—are increasingly becoming available and allow us to quantify 3D vegetation structures at fine resolution and across broad spatial extents. Here, we develop a new, open‐source workflow for classifying wetland‐related land cover types and habitats using fine‐scale lidar metrics derived from country‐wide ALS data. We developed a case study in the Netherlands with a workflow consisting of four routines: (1) pre‐processing of ALS data, (2) calculation of lidar metrics (i.e. 31 features representing cover, 3D shape, vertical variability, horizontal variability and height of vegetation as well as microtopography), (3) assessing feature importance of lidar metrics for classifying wetland habitats, and (4) applying a Random Forest algorithm for mapping and prediction. We used an expert‐based vegetation map for annotation and generated 100, 500 and 1000 annotation points for each class. Using a three‐level hierarchical approach, we differentiated at level 1 planar surfaces (e.g. roads and agricultural fields) from wetland vegetation with 82% mean overall accuracy, using predominantly height and horizontal variability metrics. At level 2, we classified wetland vegetation into four land cover types (forest, grassland, reedbeds, shrubs) with 71% mean overall accuracy, using lidar metrics related to vegetation height and horizontal and vertical variability. At level 3, we differentiated two types of land reed as well as water reed with 78% mean overall accuracy, using predominantly vertical variability metrics. Our results demonstrate that lidar metrics (related to vegetation height, cover, vertical and horizontal variability) derived from country‐wide ALS data can differentiate land cover types and habitats within wetlands at high resolution. Given appropriate annotation data, our workflow can be up‐scaled to a country‐wide extent to allow the comprehensive mapping and monitoring of wetlands at national scales.

[1]  P. K. Bøcher,et al.  Light detection and ranging explains diversity of plants, fungi, lichens, and bryophytes across multiple habitats and large geographic extent , 2019, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[2]  Arie C. Seijmonsbergen,et al.  Use and categorization of Light Detection and Ranging vegetation metrics in avian diversity and species distribution research , 2019, Diversity and Distributions.

[3]  Willem Bouten,et al.  UvA-DARE ( Digital Academic Repository ) Identification of Linear Vegetation Elements in a Rural Landscape Using LiDAR Point , 2019 .

[4]  Brian Brisco,et al.  SAR and Lidar Temporal Data Fusion Approaches to Boreal Wetland Ecosystem Monitoring , 2019, Remote. Sens..

[5]  Liviu Theodor Ene,et al.  Large-area hybrid estimation of aboveground biomass in interior Alaska using airborne laser scanning data , 2018 .

[6]  L. Hubert‐Moy,et al.  Fine-Scale Monitoring of Long-term Wetland Loss Using LiDAR Data and Historical Aerial Photographs: the Example of the Couesnon Floodplain, France , 2018, Wetlands.

[7]  Thomas Schneider,et al.  Evaluation of Green-LiDAR Data for Mapping Extent, Density and Height of Aquatic Reed Beds at Lake Chiemsee, Bavaria - Germany , 2017, Remote. Sens..

[8]  Walter Jetz,et al.  Monitoring biodiversity change through effective global coordination , 2017 .

[9]  Tamás Szirányi,et al.  Wetland mapping by fusion of airborne laser scanning and multi-temporal multispectral satellite imagery , 2017 .

[10]  A. C. Seijmonsbergen,et al.  eEcoLiDAR, eScience infrastructure for ecological applications of LiDAR point clouds: reconstructing the 3D ecosystem structure for animals at regional to continental scales , 2017 .

[11]  Jing Li,et al.  A Review of Wetland Remote Sensing , 2017, Sensors.

[12]  Michael Weinmann,et al.  A Classification-Segmentation Framework for the Detection of Individual Trees in Dense MMS Point Cloud Data Acquired in Urban Areas , 2017, Remote. Sens..

[13]  Dorota Michalska-Hejduk,et al.  Application of multisensoral remote sensing data in the mapping of alkaline fens Natura 2000 habitat , 2016 .

[14]  Knut Conradsen,et al.  Short-Term Change Detection in Wetlands Using Sentinel-1 Time Series , 2016, Remote. Sens..

[15]  N. Pettorelli,et al.  Framing the concept of satellite remote sensing essential biodiversity variables: challenges and future directions , 2016 .

[16]  N. Coops,et al.  A forest structure habitat index based on airborne laser scanning data , 2016 .

[17]  A. Zlinszky,et al.  WILL IT BLEND? VISUALIZATION AND ACCURACY EVALUATION OF HIGH- RESOLUTION FUZZY VEGETATION MAPS , 2016 .

[18]  C. Hopkinson,et al.  A Physically Based Terrain Morphology and Vegetation Structural Classification for Wetlands of the Boreal Plains, Alberta, Canada , 2016 .

[19]  Bernhard Höfle,et al.  URBAN TREE CLASSIFICATION USING FULL-WAVEFORM AIRBORNE LASER SCANNING , 2016 .

[20]  K. Islam,et al.  Integrating LIDAR‐derived canopy structure into cerulean warbler habitat models , 2016 .

[21]  Cici Alexander,et al.  Micro-topography driven vegetation patterns in open mosaic landscapes , 2016 .

[22]  Werner Mücke,et al.  Classification of vegetation in an open landscape using full-waveform airborne laser scanner data , 2015, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation.

[23]  William J. Mitsch,et al.  Ecosystem services of wetlands , 2015 .

[24]  Xiaohuan Xi,et al.  Estimation of wetland vegetation height and leaf area index using airborne laser scanning data , 2015 .

[25]  Gregory P Asner,et al.  Advances in animal ecology from 3D-LiDAR ecosystem mapping. , 2014, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[26]  N. Davidson.  How much wetland has the world lost? Long-term and recent trends in global wetland area , 2014 .

[27]  Soyeon Bae,et al.  Comparison of airborne lidar, aerial photography, and field surveys to model the habitat suitability of a cryptic forest species – the hazel grouse , 2014 .

[28]  Nicholas C. Coops,et al.  Using Small-Footprint Discrete and Full-Waveform Airborne LiDAR Metrics to Estimate Total Biomass and Biomass Components in Subtropical Forests , 2014, Remote. Sens..

[29]  K. Millard,et al.  Wetland mapping with LiDAR derivatives, SAR polarimetric decompositions, and LiDAR–SAR fusion using a random forest classifier , 2013 .

[30]  Douglas A. Miller,et al.  The Use of LiDAR Terrain Data in Characterizing Surface Roughness and Microtopography , 2013 .

[31]  Laura Chasmer,et al.  Influence of Vegetation Structure on Lidar-derived Canopy Height and Fractional Cover in Forested Riparian Buffers During Leaf-Off and Leaf-On Conditions , 2013, PloS one.

[32]  In-Young Yeo,et al.  Topographic Metrics for Improved Mapping of Forested Wetlands , 2013, Wetlands.

[33]  Norbert Pfeifer,et al.  Categorizing Wetland Vegetation by Airborne Laser Scanning on Lake Balaton and Kis-Balaton, Hungary , 2012, Remote. Sens..

[34]  Wu Chen,et al.  Coastal Wetland Investigations by Airborne LiDAR: A Case Study in the Yellow River Delta, China , 2011 .

[35]  George Alan Blackburn,et al.  Optimising the use of hyperspectral and LiDAR data for mapping reedbed habitats , 2011 .

[36]  Zulkiflee Abd Latif,et al.  Characterising Reedbed habitat quality using Leaf-off LiDAR Data , 2010, 2010 6th International Colloquium on Signal Processing & its Applications.

[37]  David L. Strayer,et al.  Ecology of freshwater shore zones , 2010, Aquatic Sciences.

[38]  H. Ellenberg.  Vegetation Mitteleuropas mit den Alpen : in ökologischer ,dynamischer und historischer Sicht , 2010 .

[39]  Guy Lebanon,et al.  Linear Regression , 2010 .

[40]  Marguerite Madden,et al.  Hyperspectral image data for mapping wetland vegetation , 2003, Wetlands.

[41]  D. Civco,et al.  Integrating multi-temporal spectral and structural information to map wetland vegetation in a lower Connecticut River tidal marsh , 2008 .

[42]  J. Hyyppä,et al.  Review of methods of small‐footprint airborne laser scanning for extracting forest inventory data in boreal forests , 2008 .

[43]  L. Vierling,et al.  Lidar: shedding new light on habitat characterization and modeling , 2008 .

[44]  Chris Hopkinson,et al.  Mapping piping plover (Charadrius melodus melodus) habitat in coastal areas using airborne lidar data , 2007 .

[45]  J. Guinan,et al.  Multiscale Terrain Analysis of Multibeam Bathymetry Data for Habitat Mapping on the Continental Slope , 2007 .

[46]  Irena F. Creed,et al.  Drainage basin morphometrics for depressional landscapes , 2004 .

[47]  Jason Weston,et al.  Gene Selection for Cancer Classification using Support Vector Machines , 2002, Machine Learning.

[48]  Leo Breiman,et al.  Random Forests , 2001, Machine Learning.

[49]  W. Cohen,et al.  Lidar Remote Sensing for Ecosystem Studies , 2002 .

[50]  J. Friedman.  Greedy function approximation: A gradient boosting machine. , 2001 .

[51]  G. Gaston.  Wetland birds. Habitat resources and conservation Implications , 1999 .

[52]  Russell G. Congalton,et al.  A review of assessing the accuracy of classifications of remotely sensed data , 1991 .

[53]  Wolfgang Ostendorp,et al.  'Die-back' of reeds in Europe-A critical review of literature , 1989 .

[54]  W. G. Howland.  Multispectral aerial photography for wetland vegetation mapping. , 1980 .