Measuring the elastic modulus of ex vivo small tissue samples.

Over the past decade, several methods have been proposed to image tissue elasticity based on imaging methods collectively called elastography. While progress in developing these systems has been rapid, the basic understanding of tissue properties to interpret elastography images is generally lacking. To address this limitation, we developed a system to measure the Young's modulus of small soft tissue specimens. This system was designed to accommodate biological soft tissue constraints such as sample size, geometry imperfection and heterogeneity. The measurement technique consists of indenting an unconfined small block of tissue while measuring the resulting force. We show that the measured force-displacement slope of such a geometry can be transformed to the tissue Young's modulus via a conversion factor related to the sample's geometry and boundary conditions using finite element analysis. We also demonstrate another measurement technique for tissue elasticity based on quasi-static magnetic resonance elastography in which a tissue specimen encased in a gelatine-agarose block undergoes cyclical compression with resulting displacements measured using a phase contrast MRI technique. The tissue Young's modulus is then reconstructed from the measured displacements using an inversion technique. Finally, preliminary elasticity measurement results of various breast tissues are presented and discussed.

[1]  R L Ehman,et al.  Tissue characterization using magnetic resonance elastography: preliminary results. , 2000, Physics in medicine and biology.

[2]  Martin J. Yaffe,et al.  Biomechanical 3-D finite element modeling of the human breast using MRI data , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[3]  T. Krouskop,et al.  Elastic Moduli of Breast and Prostate Tissues under Compression , 1998, Ultrasonic imaging.

[4]  J. Ophir,et al.  Elastography: A Quantitative Method for Imaging the Elasticity of Biological Tissues , 1991, Ultrasonic imaging.

[5]  Y. Fung,et al.  Biomechanics: Mechanical Properties of Living Tissues , 1981 .

[6]  W. O’Brien,et al.  Young's modulus measurements of soft tissues with application to elasticity imaging , 1996, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[7]  R. Sinkus,et al.  High-resolution tensor MR elastography for breast tumour detection. , 2000, Physics in medicine and biology.

[8]  A. Manduca,et al.  Magnetic resonance elastography by direct visualization of propagating acoustic strain waves. , 1995, Science.

[9]  S Y Emelianov,et al.  Elasticity reconstructive imaging by means of stimulated echo MRI , 1998, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[10]  Karl Rohr,et al.  Biomedical Modeling of the Human Head for Physically-based, Non-rigid Image Registration , 1999, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[11]  Jonathan Bishop,et al.  A constrained modulus reconstruction technique for breast cancer assessment , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[12]  H. Saunders,et al.  Finite element procedures in engineering analysis , 1982 .

[13]  A.R. Skovoroda,et al.  Measuring the Elastic Modulus of Small Tissue Samples , 1998, Ultrasonic imaging.

[14]  K D Paulsen,et al.  Magnetic resonance elastography using 3D gradient echo measurements of steady-state motion. , 2001, Medical physics.

[15]  John B Weaver,et al.  Initial in vivo experience with steady‐state subzone‐based MR elastography of the human breast , 2003, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[16]  Keith D. Paulsen,et al.  Model-updated image guidance: initial clinical experiences with gravity-induced brain deformation , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.