Correlation of thoracic and lumbar vertebral failure loads with in situ vs. ex situ dual energy X-ray absorptiometry.

In this study we explore the hypothesis that estimates of failure loads in the thoracic spine by lumbar dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) are compromised of skeletal heterogeneity throughout the spine and artifacts of spinal DXA. We studied the correlation between mechanical failure loads of thoracic and lumbar vertebrae, and that of in situ vs. ex situ lumbar DXA with thoracic and lumbar fracture loads, respectively. One hundred and nineteen subjects (76 female, age 82+/-9yr; 43 male, age 77+/-11yr) were examined under in situ conditions (anterior-posterior direction), the scans being repeated ex situ (lateral projection) in 68 cases. The failure loads of thoracic vertebrae (T) 6 and 10, and lumbar vertebra (L) 3 were determined in axial compression, using a functional 3-segment unit. The correlation between thoracic failure loads (T6 vs. T10) was significantly (p<0.01) higher (r=0.85) than those between thoracic and lumbar vertebrae (r=0.68 and 0.61, respectively). Lateral ex situ DXA displayed a significantly higher correlation (p<0.05) with lumbar vertebral fracture loads than in situ anterior-posterior DXA (r=0.85 vs. 0.71), but the correlation of thoracic failure loads with lateral ex situ lumbar DXA was similar to that obtained in situ in anterior-posterior direction (r=0.69 vs. 0.69 for T10, and r=0.61 vs. 0.65 for T6). The correlation between fracture loads of different spinal segments, and between DXA and failure loads was not significantly different between men and women. The results demonstrate a substantial heterogeneity of mechanical competence throughout the spine in elderly individuals. Because of the high incidence of fractures in the thoracic spine, these findings suggest that, clinically, lateral DXA involves no relevant advantage over anterior-posterior measurements of the lumbar spine.

[1]  J. Kollath,et al.  Effect of aortic sclerosis on bone mineral measurements by dual-photon absorptiometry. , 1991, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[2]  J S Thomsen,et al.  Lumbar vertebral body compressive strength evaluated by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, quantitative computed tomography, and ashing. , 1999, Bone.

[3]  F. Eckstein,et al.  Effect of Fixation, Soft-Tissues, and Scan Projection on Bone Mineral Measurements with Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) , 2001, Calcified Tissue International.

[4]  R I Price,et al.  Formalin fixation effects on vertebral bone density and failure mechanics: an in-vitro study of human and sheep vertebrae. , 1994, Clinical biomechanics.

[5]  S. H. Kan,et al.  Epidemiology of vertebral fractures in women. , 1989, American journal of epidemiology.

[6]  R. Ziegler,et al.  Clinical Grading of Spinal Osteoporosis: Quality of Life Components and Spinal Deformity in Women with Chronic Low Back Pain and Women with Vertebral Osteoporosis , 1997, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[7]  R. Recker,et al.  The proportion of trabecular bone in human vertebrae , 1987, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[8]  C. Christiansen,et al.  Impact of soft tissue on in vivo accuracy of bone mineral measurements in the spine, hip, and forearm: A human cadaver study , 1995, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[9]  T. Hansson,et al.  The Bone Mineral Content and Ultimate Compressive Strength of Lumbar Vertebrae , 1980, Spine.

[10]  M. Hahn,et al.  Heterogeneity of the skeleton: Comparison of the trabecular microarchitecture of the spine, the iliac crest, the femur, and the calcaneus , 1996, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[11]  C. Hirsch,et al.  Factors affecting the determination of the physical properties of femoral cortical bone. , 1966, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[12]  A. D. De Smet,et al.  Spinal compression fractures in osteoporotic women: patterns and relationship to hyperkyphosis. , 1988, Radiology.

[13]  F. Eckstein,et al.  Precision and intersite correlation of bone densitometry at the radius, tibia and femur with peripheral quantitative CT , 1999, Skeletal Radiology.

[14]  R. Barber,et al.  The influence of tissue depth and composition on the performance of the Lunar dual-energy X-ray absorptiometer whole-body scanning mode. , 1992, European journal of clinical nutrition.

[15]  K. Singer,et al.  In-vitro relationships between vertebral body density, size, and compressive strength the elderly thoracolumbar spine. , 1994, Clinical biomechanics.

[16]  W. Hayes,et al.  Prediction of vertebral body compressive fracture using quantitative computed tomography. , 1985, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[17]  G Van der Perre,et al.  Prediction of Vertebral Strength In Vitro by Spinal Bone Densitometry and Calcaneal Ultrasound , 1997, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[18]  L. Mosekilde,et al.  Estimation of vertebral body strength by dual photon absorptiometry in elderly individuals: comparison between measurements of total vertebral and vertebral body bone mineral. , 1993, Bone.

[19]  Elisha S. Gurdjian,et al.  Changes in Physical Properties of Bone Between the In Vivo, Freshly Dead, and Embalmed Conditions , 1968 .

[20]  D. Cody,et al.  Correlations Between Vertebral Regional Bone Mineral Density (rBMD) and Whole Bone Fracture Load , 1991, Spine.

[21]  C. Cooper,et al.  Incidence of clinically diagnosed vertebral fractures: A population‐based study in rochester, minnesota, 1985‐1989 , 1992, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[22]  F. Eckstein,et al.  In Situ Femoral Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry Related to Ash Weight, Bone Size and Density, and its Relationship with Mechanical Failure Loads of the Proximal Femur , 2000, Osteoporosis International.

[23]  K. Singer,et al.  Prediction of thoracic and lumbar vertebral body compressive strength: correlations with bone mineral density and vertebral region. , 1995, Bone.

[24]  J. Adams,et al.  Single and dual energy X-ray absorptiometry , 1997, European Radiology.

[25]  F Eckstein,et al.  Prediction of vertebral failure loads from spinal and femoral dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, and calcaneal ultrasound: an in situ analysis with intact soft tissues. , 1998, Bone.

[26]  E. F. Byars,et al.  EFFECT OF EMBALMING ON THE MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF BEEF BONE. , 1964, Journal of applied physiology.

[27]  M. Härmä,et al.  Thoracic spine compression fractures in Finland. , 1986, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[28]  L. Melton,et al.  Medical Expenditures for the Treatment of Osteoporotic Fractures in the United States in 1995: Report from the National Osteoporosis Foundation , 1997, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[29]  P. Tothill,et al.  Errors due to non-uniform distribution of fat in dual X-ray absorptiometry of the lumbar spine. , 1992, The British journal of radiology.

[30]  C. Christiansen,et al.  Accuracy of lumbar spine bone mineral content by dual photon absorptiometry. , 1988, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.