Dabigatran Dosing Proposal for Adults With Atrial Fibrillation: Stress‐Testing Renal Function Range in Real World Patients

Dabigatran is the first of four direct‐acting oral anticoagulants approved to prevent stroke in adult patients with atrial fibrillation using a fixed two‐dose scheme compared with warfarin dosing adjusted to a prothrombin time range associated with optimal risk reduction in stroke and serious bleeding. The pivotal phase III trial found dabigatran, depending on dose, is superior to warfarin in stroke reduction and similar in bleeding risk while also showing dabigatran efficacy and safety correlate with steady‐state plasma concentrations. Because the relationship between dabigatran dose and plasma concentration is highly variable, a previously developed population pharmacokinetic model of over 9,000 clinical trial patients was used as a basis for simulations comparing the performance of dosing via the drug label to other proposed doses and regimens. Assessment of dosing regimen performance was based on simulations of trough plasma levels within the therapeutic concentration range of 75–150 ng/mL over a renal function range of 15–250 mL/min creatinine clearance, representing extremes for real‐world patients. An improved regimen that best achieves this therapeutic range was identified, requiring five different dosing schedules, corresponding to specified renal function ranges, compared with the two approved in the label. The discussion focuses on how this information could better inform patient outcomes and future dabigatran development.

[1]  M. Ezekowitz,et al.  Direct Oral Anticoagulants Versus Warfarin in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: Patient-Level Network Meta-Analyses of Randomized Clinical Trials With Interaction Testing by Age and Sex , 2022, Circulation.

[2]  N. Limdi,et al.  Thromboembolic and Hemorrhagic Outcomes in the Direct Oral Anticoagulant Trials Across the Spectrum of Kidney Function , 2020, Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.

[3]  J. Powell,et al.  Drug Dosing Recommendations for All Patients: A Roadmap for Change , 2020, Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.

[4]  P. Watkins,et al.  Rivaroxaban Precision Dosing Strategy for Real‐World Atrial Fibrillation Patients , 2020, Clinical and translational science.

[5]  E. Peterson,et al.  Healthcare costs of stroke and major bleeding in patients with atrial fibrillation treated with non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants , 2019, Journal of medical economics.

[6]  S. Yusuf,et al.  Efficacy and safety of dabigatran compared with warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation in relation to renal function over time—A RE‐LY trial analysis , 2018, American heart journal.

[7]  O. Hanon,et al.  Real-Life Peak and Trough Dabigatran Plasma Measurements Over Time in Hospitalized Geriatric Patients with Atrial Fibrillation , 2018, The journal of nutrition, health & aging.

[8]  Jonathan H Seltzer,et al.  Is there a role for pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic‐guided dosing for novel oral anticoagulants? , 2017, American heart journal.

[9]  G. Flaker,et al.  Atrial Fibrillation In Athletes: Pathophysiology, Clinical Presentation, Evaluation and Management. , 2015, Journal of atrial fibrillation.

[10]  Z. Endre,et al.  Lean mass modulates glomerular filtration rate in males of normal and extreme body composition , 2014, Internal medicine journal.

[11]  S. Yusuf,et al.  The effect of dabigatran plasma concentrations and patient characteristics on the frequency of ischemic stroke and major bleeding in atrial fibrillation patients: the RE-LY Trial (Randomized Evaluation of Long-Term Anticoagulation Therapy). , 2014, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[12]  S. Yusuf,et al.  Population pharmacokinetic analysis of the oral thrombin inhibitor dabigatran etexilate in patients with non‐valvular atrial fibrillation from the RE‐LY trial , 2011, Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH.

[13]  P. Kirchhof Faculty Opinions recommendation of Efficacy and safety of dabigatran compared with warfarin at different levels of international normalised ratio control for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: an analysis of the RE-LY trial. , 2010 .

[14]  M. D. De Martino,et al.  The kidney in acromegaly: renal structure and function in patients with acromegaly during active disease and 1 year after disease remission. , 2010, European journal of endocrinology.

[15]  S. Yusuf,et al.  Dabigatran versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[16]  K. Rathgen,et al.  The pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and tolerability of dabigatran etexilate, a new oral direct thrombin inhibitor, in healthy male subjects. , 2007, British journal of clinical pharmacology.

[17]  A Laupacis,et al.  Prevalence, age distribution, and gender of patients with atrial fibrillation. Analysis and implications. , 1995, Archives of internal medicine.

[18]  D. Radford,et al.  Atrial fibrillation in children. , 1977, Pediatrics.

[19]  E. Crowell,et al.  Randomized prospective trial of continuous vs intermittent heparin therapy. , 1976, JAMA.

[20]  M. H. Gault,et al.  Prediction of creatinine clearance from serum creatinine. , 1975, Nephron.

[21]  S. Wessler,et al.  A Guide to Anticoagulant Therapy , 1961, Circulation.

[22]  Matthew C Katz A roadmap for change. , 2011, Connecticut medicine.

[23]  A. Park,et al.  CENTER FOR DRUG EVALUATION AND RESEARCH , 2009 .