Phenotypic characterisation of Saccharomyces spp. yeast for tolerance to stresses encountered during fermentation of lignocellulosic residues to produce bioethanol

BackgroundDuring industrial fermentation of lignocellulose residues to produce bioethanol, microorganisms are exposed to a number of factors that influence productivity. These include inhibitory compounds produced by the pre-treatment processes required to release constituent carbohydrates from biomass feed-stocks and during fermentation, exposure of the organisms to stressful conditions. In addition, for lignocellulosic bioethanol production, conversion of both pentose and hexose sugars is a pre-requisite for fermentative organisms for efficient and complete conversion. All these factors are important to maximise industrial efficiency, productivity and profit margins in order to make second-generation bioethanol an economically viable alternative to fossil fuels for future transport needs.ResultsThe aim of the current study was to assess Saccharomyces yeasts for their capacity to tolerate osmotic, temperature and ethanol stresses and inhibitors that might typically be released during steam explosion of wheat straw. Phenotypic microarray analysis was used to measure tolerance as a function of growth and metabolic activity. Saccharomyces strains analysed in this study displayed natural variation to each stress condition common in bioethanol fermentations. In addition, many strains displayed tolerance to more than one stress, such as inhibitor tolerance combined with fermentation stresses.ConclusionsOur results suggest that this study could identify a potential candidate strain or strains for efficient second generation bioethanol production. Knowledge of the Saccharomyces spp. strains grown in these conditions will aid the development of breeding programmes in order to generate more efficient strains for industrial fermentations.

[1]  B. Bochner.  Sleuthing out bacterial identities , 1989, Nature.

[2]  J. Piškur,et al.  Horizontal Transfer of Genetic Material amongSaccharomyces Yeasts , 1999, Journal of bacteriology.

[3]  J. Pronk,et al.  Minimal metabolic engineering of Saccharomyces cerevisiae for efficient anaerobic xylose fermentation: a proof of principle. , 2004, FEMS yeast research.

[4]  Robert R. Sokal,et al.  A statistical method for evaluating systematic relationships , 1958 .

[5]  Amparo Querol,et al.  Fermentative stress adaptation of hybrids within the Saccharomyces sensu stricto complex. , 2008, International journal of food microbiology.

[6]  J. N. Kay,et al.  Forward Genetic Analysis of Visual Behavior in Zebrafish , 2005, PLoS genetics.

[7]  Yuhua Zhao,et al.  Genome sequencing and genetic breeding of a bioethanol Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain YJS329 , 2012, BMC Genomics.

[8]  Z. P. Çakar,et al.  Evolutionary engineering of Saccharomyces cerevisiae for improved industrially important properties. , 2012, FEMS yeast research.

[9]  Francisco A. Cubillos,et al.  Generation of a large set of genetically tractable haploid and diploid Saccharomyces strains. , 2009, FEMS yeast research.

[10]  Chris Boulton,et al.  Brewing: Science and Practice , 2004 .

[11]  Yan Lin,et al.  Ethanol fermentation from biomass resources: current state and prospects , 2006, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology.

[12]  D. Greig,et al.  Epistasis and hybrid sterility in Saccharomyces , 2002, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[13]  A. Kunicka-Styczyńska,et al.  Phenotypic and genotypic diversity of wine yeasts used for acidic musts , 2012, World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology.

[14]  S. Lindquist,et al.  Harnessing Natural Diversity to Probe Metabolic Pathways , 2005, PLoS genetics.

[15]  L. Olsson,et al.  Comparison of SHF and SSF processes from steam‐exploded wheat straw for ethanol production by xylose‐fermenting and robust glucose‐fermenting Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains , 2008, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[16]  P. Kötter,et al.  Xylose fermentation by Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 1993, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology.

[17]  W. V. van Zyl,et al.  Exploring grape marc as trove for new thermotolerant and inhibitor-tolerant Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains for second-generation bioethanol production , 2013, Biotechnology for Biofuels.

[18]  E. Nevoigt,et al.  Genetic improvement of brewer’s yeast: current state, perspectives and limits , 2010, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology.

[19]  Luiz Augusto Horta Nogueira,et al.  Land demand for ethanol production , 2013 .

[20]  M. Whiteway,et al.  Comparative Xylose Metabolism among the Ascomycetes C. albicans, S. stipitis and S. cerevisiae , 2013, PloS one.

[21]  D. Botstein,et al.  Cluster analysis and display of genome-wide expression patterns. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[22]  Alok J. Saldanha,et al.  Java Treeview - extensible visualization of microarray data , 2004, Bioinform..

[23]  Taku Katou,et al.  QTL mapping of sake brewing characteristics of yeast. , 2009, Journal of bioscience and bioengineering.

[24]  Miguel C. Teixeira,et al.  Identification of candidate genes for yeast engineering to improve bioethanol production in very high gravity and lignocellulosic biomass industrial fermentations , 2011, Biotechnology for biofuels.

[25]  S. Hohmann.  Osmotic Stress Signaling and Osmoadaptation in Yeasts , 2002, Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews.

[26]  G. Bell,et al.  Saccharomyces sensu stricto as a model system for evolution and ecology. , 2008, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[27]  E. Louis.  Population genomics and speciation in yeasts , 2011 .

[28]  G. Fleet.  Wine yeasts for the future. , 2008, FEMS yeast research.

[29]  M. Morange,et al.  Microbial Cell Factories , 2006 .

[30]  N. Meinander,et al.  Main and interaction effects of acetic acid, furfural, and p-hydroxybenzoic acid on growth and ethanol productivity of yeasts. , 1999, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[31]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[32]  L. Jönsson,et al.  Bioconversion of lignocellulose: inhibitors and detoxification , 2013, Biotechnology for Biofuels.

[33]  C. Laluce,et al.  Advances and Developments in Strategies to Improve Strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Processes to Obtain the Lignocellulosic Ethanol−A Review , 2012, Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology.

[34]  G. Naumov.  Hybridization analysis of the new biological species Saccharomyces arboricolus Wang et Bai , 2009, Doklady Biological Sciences.

[35]  Gavin Sherlock,et al.  Bulk Segregant Analysis by High-Throughput Sequencing Reveals a Novel Xylose Utilization Gene from Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2010, PLoS genetics.

[36]  Anders Blomberg,et al.  Trait Variation in Yeast Is Defined by Population History , 2011, PLoS genetics.

[37]  M. Aigle,et al.  Molecular genetic study of introgression between Saccharomyces bayanus and S. cerevisiae , 2005, Yeast.

[38]  Francisco A. Cubillos,et al.  Life history shapes trait heredity by accumulation of loss-of-function alleles in yeast. , 2012, Molecular biology and evolution.

[39]  Michael Taylor,et al.  An overview of second generation biofuel technologies. , 2010, Bioresource technology.

[40]  P. Gonçalves,et al.  Evidence for Divergent Evolution of Growth Temperature Preference in Sympatric Saccharomyces Species , 2011, PloS one.

[41]  Yanyan Zhang,et al.  Improvement of L-Arabinose Fermentation by Modifying the Metabolic Pathway and Transport in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2013, BioMed research international.

[42]  Korneel Rabaey,et al.  Conversion of Wastes into Bioelectricity and Chemicals by Using Microbial Electrochemical Technologies , 2012, Science.

[43]  Carlos Ricardo Soccol,et al.  Bioethanol from lignocelluloses: Status and perspectives in Brazil. , 2010, Bioresource technology.

[44]  Y. Kaneko,et al.  Saccharomyces sensu stricto: systematics, genetic diversity and evolution. , 2003, Journal of bioscience and bioengineering.

[45]  J E Campbell,et al.  Land-use and alternative bioenergy pathways for waste biomass. , 2010, Environmental science & technology.

[46]  G. Zacchi,et al.  The generation of fermentation inhibitors during dilute acid hydrolysis of softwood , 1999 .

[47]  K. Pramanik,et al.  Improvement of multiple stress tolerance in yeast strain by sequential mutagenesis for enhanced bioethanol production. , 2012, Journal of bioscience and bioengineering.

[48]  Mark Johnston,et al.  Microbe domestication and the identification of the wild genetic stock of lager-brewing yeast , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[49]  Justin C. Fay,et al.  Evidence for Domesticated and Wild Populations of Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2005, PLoS genetics.

[50]  Gianni Liti,et al.  Sequence Diversity, Reproductive Isolation and Species Concepts in Saccharomyces , 2006, Genetics.

[51]  F. Bai,et al.  Saccharomyces arboricolus sp. nov., a yeast species from tree bark. , 2008, International journal of systematic and evolutionary microbiology.

[52]  D. Dubourdieu,et al.  New Hybrids between Saccharomyces Sensu Stricto Yeast Species Found among Wine and Cider Production Strains , 1998, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[53]  Leopold Parts,et al.  Assessing the complex architecture of polygenic traits in diverged yeast populations , 2011, Molecular ecology.

[54]  C. Powell,et al.  The impact of brewing yeast cell age on fermentation performance, attenuation and flocculation. , 2003, FEMS yeast research.

[55]  G. Liti,et al.  Inferences of evolutionary relationships from a population survey of LTR‐retrotransposons and telomeric‐associated sequences in the Saccharomyces sensu stricto complex , 2005, Yeast.

[56]  Z. Salvadó,et al.  Temperature Adaptation Markedly Determines Evolution within the Genus Saccharomyces , 2011, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[57]  Robert P. Davey,et al.  Population genomics of domestic and wild yeasts , 2008, Nature.

[58]  Alan M. Moses,et al.  High quality de novo sequencing and assembly of the Saccharomyces arboricolus genome , 2013, BMC Genomics.

[59]  E. Naumova,et al.  Genetic identification of new biological species Saccharomyces arboricolus Wang et Bai , 2010, Antonie van Leeuwenhoek.

[60]  W. M. Ingledew,et al.  Ethanol tolerance in yeasts. , 1986, Critical reviews in microbiology.

[61]  U. Sauer,et al.  Fermentation performance of engineered and evolved xylose‐fermenting Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains , 2004, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[62]  P. Attfield,et al.  Use of population genetics to derive nonrecombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains that grow using xylose as a sole carbon source. , 2006, FEMS yeast research.

[63]  Marcos S. Buckeridge,et al.  Scientific challenges of bioethanol production in Brazil , 2011, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology.

[64]  C. Boonchird,et al.  Highly efficient bioethanol production by a Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain with multiple stress tolerance to high temperature, acid and ethanol. , 2012, New biotechnology.

[65]  Alan M. Moses,et al.  Revealing the genetic structure of a trait by sequencing a population under selection. , 2011, Genome research.

[66]  F. Bai,et al.  Mechanisms of yeast stress tolerance and its manipulation for efficient fuel ethanol production. , 2009, Journal of biotechnology.