Simulation of forward osmosis membrane process: Effect of membrane orientation and flow direction of feed and draw solutions

Abstract Performance of forward osmosis (FO) process is significantly affected by factors such as membrane properties, concentration polarization (CP), and fouling. In this study, FO performance of a plate and frame type membrane is investigated via a numerical simulation based on mass conservation theorem. To evaluate the FO membrane performance, permeate flux and recovery rate are simulated according to membrane orientation, flow direction of feed and draw solutions, flow rate, and solute resistivity (K). In the case of membrane orientation, all-inside case, in which the draw solution faces the active layer, displays a relatively higher performance than all-outside and all-up cases. Notably, the membrane performance is highly affected by K indicating the extent of the internal CP. During the simulation approach, the spatial variation of the concentration profile was observed on a 2-dimensional membrane area; it was expected to cause a high diffusion load on a particular area of membrane, due to the relatively higher flux at that location. Moreover, it can result in unexpected fouling in a specific area on a membrane. Accordingly, the findings in this study suggest that the numerical simulation can be applied to optimize both physical properties and operation conditions, thereby ensuring cost-effective operation of FO processes.

[1]  How Yong Ng,et al.  Modified models to predict flux behavior in forward osmosis in consideration of external and internal concentration polarizations , 2008 .

[2]  J. McCutcheon,et al.  Influence of concentrative and dilutive internal concentration polarization on flux behavior in forward osmosis , 2006 .

[3]  C. Colby,et al.  Estimating the cost of desalination plants using a cost database , 2008 .

[4]  Joon Ha Kim,et al.  Site-specific raw seawater quality impact study on SWRO process for optimizing operation of the pressurized step , 2009 .

[5]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  A novel ammonia-carbon dioxide forward (direct) osmosis desalination process , 2005 .

[6]  Robert L McGinnis,et al.  Desalination by ammonia–carbon dioxide forward osmosis: Influence of draw and feed solution concentrations on process performance , 2006 .

[7]  H. Ng,et al.  Performance of forward (direct) osmosis process: membrane structure and transport phenomenon. , 2006, Environmental science & technology.

[8]  Joon Ha Kim,et al.  Total annual profits estimation for new construction of an SWRO desalination plant in Korea , 2010 .

[9]  R. Baker Membrane Technology and Applications , 1999 .

[10]  P. Glueckstern,et al.  Cost estimates of large RO systems , 1991 .

[11]  R. Srinivasan,et al.  A global sensitivity analysis tool for the parameters of multi-variable catchment models , 2006 .

[12]  Joon Ha Kim,et al.  Development of a package model for process simulation and cost estimation of seawater reverse osmosis desalination plant , 2009 .

[13]  Amy E. Childress,et al.  Forward osmosis: Principles, applications, and recent developments , 2006 .

[14]  Lianfa Song,et al.  A numerical study on concentration polarization and system performance of spiral wound RO membrane modules , 2006 .

[15]  Chuyang Y. Tang,et al.  Coupled effects of internal concentration polarization and fouling on flux behavior of forward osmosis membranes during humic acid filtration , 2010 .

[16]  Joon Ha Kim,et al.  Overview of systems engineering approaches for a large-scale seawater desalination plant with a reverse osmosis network , 2009 .

[17]  Tzahi Y Cath,et al.  Forward osmosis for concentration of anaerobic digester centrate. , 2007, Water research.

[18]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  Modeling water flux in forward osmosis: Implications for improved membrane design , 2007 .

[19]  J. McCutcheon,et al.  Internal concentration polarization in forward osmosis: role of membrane orientation , 2006 .

[20]  Joon Ha Kim,et al.  Artificial neural network model for optimizing operation of a seawater reverse osmosis desalination plant. , 2009 .

[21]  Gordon F. Leitner,et al.  Desalting seawater and brackish water: a cost update , 1979 .

[22]  Takeshi Matsuura,et al.  Progress in membrane science and technology for seawater desalination — a review , 2001 .

[23]  R. Baker,et al.  Membranes for power generation by pressure-retarded osmosis , 1981 .

[24]  R. W. Skaggs,et al.  SENSITIVITY ANALYSES OF THE NITROGEN SIMULATION MODEL, DRAINMOD-N II , 2005 .

[25]  K.S.M.S. Raghavarao,et al.  Effect of process parameters on transmembrane flux during direct osmosis. , 2006 .