Learning Structural Equation Models for fMRI

Structural equation models can be seen as an extension of Gaussian belief networks to cyclic graphs, and we show they can be understood generatively as the model for the joint distribution of long term average equilibrium activity of Gaussian dynamic belief networks. Most use of structural equation models in fMRI involves postulating a particular structure and comparing learnt parameters across different groups. In this paper it is argued that there are situations where priors about structure are not firm or exhaustive, and given sufficient data, it is worth investigating learning network structure as part of the approach to connectivity analysis. First we demonstrate structure learning on a toy problem. We then show that for particular fMRI data the simple models usually assumed are not supported. We show that is is possible to learn sensible structural equation models that can provide modelling benefits, but that are not necessarily going to be the same as a true causal model, and suggest the combination of prior models and learning or the use of temporal information from dynamic models may provide more benefits than learning structural equations alone.

[1]  Illtyd Trethowan Causality , 1938 .

[2]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Dynamic causal modelling , 2003, NeuroImage.

[3]  K J Friston,et al.  The predictive value of changes in effective connectivity for human learning. , 1999, Science.

[4]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Comparing dynamic causal models , 2004, NeuroImage.

[5]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Attentional modulation of effective connectivity from V2 to V5/MT in humans. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[6]  E. Bullmore,et al.  How Good Is Good Enough in Path Analysis of fMRI Data? , 2000, NeuroImage.

[7]  Tom Burr,et al.  Causation, Prediction, and Search , 2003, Technometrics.

[8]  Peter Stoeter,et al.  Altered effective connectivity during working memory performance in schizophrenia: a study with fMRI and structural equation modeling , 2003, NeuroImage.

[9]  F. Gonzalez-Lima,et al.  Structural equation modeling and its application to network analysis in functional brain imaging , 1994 .

[10]  Lester Melie-García,et al.  Estimating brain functional connectivity with sparse multivariate autoregression , 2005, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[11]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  Correlation and Causation , 1937, Wilmott.

[12]  Stephen M Smith,et al.  Variability in fMRI: A re‐examination of inter‐session differences , 2005, Human brain mapping.

[13]  Jagath C. Rajapakse,et al.  Learning functional structure from fMR images , 2006, NeuroImage.

[14]  Thomas S. Richardson,et al.  A Discovery Algorithm for Directed Cyclic Graphs , 1996, UAI.

[15]  G. Schwarz Estimating the Dimension of a Model , 1978 .

[16]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Variability in fMRI: An Examination of Intersession Differences , 2000, NeuroImage.

[17]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  Correlation and Causation. , 1982 .

[18]  T. Haavelmo The Statistical Implications of a System of Simultaneous Equations , 1943 .

[19]  Enrico Simonotto,et al.  Functional disconnectivity in subjects at high genetic risk of schizophrenia. , 2005, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[20]  Denver Dash,et al.  Restructuring Dynamic Causal Systems in Equilibrium , 2005, AISTATS.