Assessing the use of IP network management protocols in smart grids

Conventional electricity grids evolve into smart grids by incorporating Information and Communications Technology (ICT) services. These services are meant to provide finegrained monitoring of the grid and pervasive control over its components. The ultimate goal is to avoid major failures and blackouts and to improve the efficiency of energy generation, transmission, and consumption. Smart grids support two-way flow of information and energy between the supply and demand sides at various levels from generation sites down to individual consumers. A smart grid can therefore potentially contain millions of intelligent devices able to collect, process and communicate data. These devices need to be monitored and configured to ensure proper operation. This is the role of a network management protocol which enables communication between a network management system and grid devices. Currently no protocol is widely accepted as a management protocol for smart grid devices. We, therefore, assess the use of some standard Internet protocols as potential candidates for this job. Namely, we consider the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP), the Hyper Text Transfer Protocol (HTTP) and the Constrained Application Protocol (CoAP). We compare these protocols according to a set of criteria that we propose. Also, we test implementations of all three protocols over the Arduino hardware platform.

[1]  H. Farhangi,et al.  The path of the smart grid , 2010, IEEE Power and Energy Magazine.

[2]  Yvonne Anne Pignolet,et al.  REST assured, we manage your microgrid , 2014, 2014 IEEE International Conference on Smart Grid Communications (SmartGridComm).

[3]  Subhas Chandra Mukhopadhyay,et al.  Wireless Sensor Networks and Ecological Monitoring , 2013 .

[4]  Youngseok Lee,et al.  NAT Issues in the Remote Management of Home Network Devices , 2008, IEEE Network.

[5]  Ian F. Akyildiz,et al.  Wireless sensor networks: a survey , 2002, Comput. Networks.

[6]  Feng Zhao,et al.  Tiny web services: design and implementation of interoperable and evolvable sensor networks , 2008, SenSys '08.

[7]  Klara Nahrstedt,et al.  Secure and Scalable Data Collection With Time Minimization in the Smart Grid , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[8]  Fred Baker,et al.  Internet Protocols for the Smart Grid , 2011, RFC.

[9]  Srinivasan Seshan,et al.  IrisNet: An Architecture for a Worldwide Sensor Web , 2003, IEEE Pervasive Comput..

[10]  H. T. Mouftah,et al.  A Survey of Sensor Web Services for the Smart Grid , 2013, J. Sens. Actuator Networks.

[11]  Mahesh Sooriyabandara,et al.  Smart Grid Communications: Overview of Research Challenges, Solutions, and Standardization Activities , 2011, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[12]  Taskin Koçak,et al.  Smart Grid Technologies: Communication Technologies and Standards , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics.

[13]  Adam Dunkels,et al.  Full TCP/IP for 8-bit architectures , 2003, MobiSys '03.

[14]  Roy T. Fielding,et al.  Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP/1.1): Message Syntax and Routing , 2014, RFC.

[15]  Mohamed Essaaidi,et al.  Wireless Sensor Network applications in smart grid , 2014, 2014 International Renewable and Sustainable Energy Conference (IRSEC).

[16]  Leonard Richardson,et al.  RESTful Web APIs , 2013 .

[17]  Carsten Bormann,et al.  The Constrained Application Protocol (CoAP) , 2014, RFC.

[18]  Marco Conti,et al.  The role of communication systems in smart grids: Architectures, technical solutions and research challenges , 2013, Comput. Commun..