Analysis of the development strategy of late-entrants in Taiwan and Korea’s TFT-LCD industry

Abstract The strong and sustained growth performance over the last few decades of the emerging economies in Southeast Asia, including Korea and Taiwan, has stimulated an extensive literature. The ‘miracle’ explanation of economic growth in the Asian region is now discredited but the phenomenon remains the subject of several important economic debates in an extensive literature. These debates include the issue of whether there is a distinct Asian ‘model’ of growth, the extent to which their success marks the triumph of market-oriented solutions over government intervention and the sources of their competitiveness and productivity growth. This study examines the development strategy of late entrants in Taiwan and Korea’s TFT-LCD industry. It was suggested that Korea, under the full support of its government, tends to challenge the first mover in the TFT-LCD technology and compete with the frontier-Japan. On the other hand, Taiwan did not attempt to challenge the technology leadership in a confrontational manner, but focused on being a superior quick follower. In addition, the research paper also addresses the competitive strategies of both countries. The niche strategy for Korea can be attributed to global networking, production, investment, and innovation capability, while the niche strategy and the core competence of Taiwan’s TFT-LCD industry is mainly from system integration capability, quality, cost, and flexibility. The approaches of Taiwan and Korea may shed light on the strategies to be followed by developing countries when they seek to enter knowledge-intensive, high-technology sectors.

[1]  Shang Jyh Liu,et al.  Liquid crystal display industry in Taiwan , 1997 .

[2]  Michael Stolpe,et al.  Determinants of knowledge diffusion as evidenced in patent data: the case of liquid crystal display technology , 2002 .

[3]  Dong-Sung Cho,et al.  Latecomer Strategies: Evidence From the Semiconductor Industry in Japan and Korea , 1998 .

[4]  Myung-Hwan Rim,et al.  Transition of Latecomer Firms from Technology Users to Technology Generators: Korean Semiconductor Firms , 2000 .

[5]  Fernando F. Suarez,et al.  The Role of Environmental Dynamics in Building a First Mover Advantage Theory , 2007 .

[6]  Ulrich Lichtenthaler,et al.  The impact of aligning product development and technology licensing : a contingency perspective , 2011 .

[7]  Yooncheol Lim Development of the public sector in the Korean innovation system , 2000, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[8]  Graham Sewell,et al.  Strategies for technological development in South Korea and Taiwan: the case of semiconductors , 1996 .

[9]  Frederick Betz,et al.  Managing Technological Innovation: Competitive Advantage from Change , 1997 .

[10]  M. Hobday,et al.  Governance of technology in the electronics industries of East and South-East Asia , 2001 .

[11]  E. Petrakis,et al.  Timing of Technology Adoption and Product Market Competition , 2009, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[12]  Dilek Çetindamar,et al.  Understanding technology management as a dynamic capability: A framework for technology management activities , 2009 .

[13]  Shiu-Wan Hung,et al.  Competitive strategies for Taiwan's thin film transistor-liquid crystal display (TFT-LCD) industry , 2006 .

[14]  J. Barney Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[15]  D. Teece Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy , 1993 .

[16]  S. Lo Global warming action of Taiwan’s semiconductor/TFT-LCD industries: How does voluntary agreement work in the IT industry? , 2010 .

[17]  Shiu‐Wan Hung,et al.  Evaluating profitability and marketability of Taiwan’s IC fabless firms: An DEA approach , 2009 .

[18]  C. Hill Strategies for Exploiting Technological Innovations: When and When Not to License , 1992 .

[19]  Michael Hobday,et al.  East Asian latecomer firms: Learning the technology of electronics , 1995 .

[20]  D. B. Montgomery,et al.  First-mover (dis)advantages: Retrospective and link with the resource-based view , 1998 .

[21]  Heidrun C. Hoppe Second-mover advantages in the strategic adoption of new technology under uncertainty , 2000 .

[22]  G. Tyge Payne,et al.  First Movers and Performance: Timing Is Everything , 2008 .

[23]  Hyun-Dae Cho,et al.  The developmental path of networking capability of catch‐up players in Korea's semiconductor industry , 2003 .

[24]  William T. Robinson,et al.  Is the First to Market the First to Fail? Empirical Evidence for Industrial Goods Businesses , 2002 .

[25]  Jedrzej George Frynas,et al.  First mover advantages in international business and firm‐specific political resources , 2006 .

[26]  Wen-Min Lu,et al.  Exploring the operating efficiency of Technology Development Programs by an intellectual capital perspective—A case study of Taiwan , 2011 .

[27]  D. Teece,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES AND STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1997 .

[28]  Ulrich Lehmann-Grube,et al.  Second-Mover Advantages in Dynamic Quality Competition , 2001 .

[29]  Shiu-Wan Hung,et al.  Factors affecting the choice of technology acquisition mode: An empirical analysis of the electronic firms of Japan, Korea and Taiwan , 2008 .

[30]  Jae-Yong Choung,et al.  Patterns of innovation in Korea and Taiwan , 1998 .

[31]  D. B. Montgomery,et al.  First‐mover advantages , 1988 .

[32]  Jamal Shamsie,et al.  Better late than never: A study of late entrants in household electrical equipment , 2004 .

[33]  Se-Hwa Wu,et al.  Towards a knowledge-based view of OEM relationship building: sharing of industrial experiences in Taiwan , 2001, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[34]  Tariq Malik,et al.  Vertical alliance and vertical integration for the inflow of technology and new product development in the pharmaceutical industry , 2011, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[35]  D. Teece Competition, Cooperation, and Innovation Organizational Arrangements for Regimes of Rapid Technological Progress , 1992 .

[36]  John A. Mathews,et al.  Combinative capabilities and organizational learning in latecomer firms: the case of the Korean semiconductor industry , 1999 .