Backward response-level crosstalk in the psychological refractory period paradigm.

Bottleneck models of psychological refractory period (PRP) tasks suggest that a Task 1 response should be unaffected by the Task 2 response in the same trial, because selection of the former finishes before selection of the latter begins. Contrary to this conception, the authors found backward response-level crosstalk effects in which Task 2 response force requirements influenced the force-time dynamics of Task 1 responses. Specifically, Task 2 required a hard or soft keypress response. Task 1 responses were harder when the upcoming Task 2 response was to press hard rather than soft, suggesting some activation of Task 2 response parameters before Task 1 processing reached the final ballistic motor output stage. A 3rd experiment using a flankers paradigm showed that this effect did not arise from automatic activation of responses by the stimuli associated with hard and soft responses. This backward response-level crosstalk extends previous findings of backward crosstalk in the PRP paradigm by showing that crosstalk can affect motor output as well as response time and can arise even when the 2 tasks being performed are not semantically related.

[1]  F. Donders,et al.  Over de snelheid van psychische Processen , 1868 .

[2]  Thomas C. Way,et al.  Varied and constant intersignal intervals in psychological refractoriness , 1966 .

[3]  J R Simon,et al.  Effect of ear stimulated on reaction time and movement time. , 1968, Journal of experimental psychology.

[4]  R Gottsdanker,et al.  Psychological refractoriness with varying differences between tasks. , 1968, Journal of experimental psychology.

[5]  Saul Sternberg,et al.  The discovery of processing stages: Extensions of Donders' method , 1969 .

[6]  R. Gottsdanker Interacting responses to crowded signals , 1969 .

[7]  J. Brožek Attention and Performance II. , 1971 .

[8]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task , 1974 .

[9]  A. Hedge,et al.  The effect of irrelevant spatial correspondences on two-choice response-time. , 1975, Acta psychologica.

[10]  D. Wakelin The role of the response in psychological refractoriness. , 1976, Acta psychologica.

[11]  J. Duncan Response Selection Errors in Spatial Choice Reaction Tasks , 1977 .

[12]  J. Duncan,et al.  Response selection in spatial choice reaction: further evidence against associative models. , 1978, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[13]  B. Bergum,et al.  Attention and Performance VI , 1978 .

[14]  J. Duncan Divided attention: the whole is more than the sum of its parts. , 1979, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[15]  J. Requin Attention and Performance VII , 1980 .

[16]  H Pashler,et al.  Processing stages in overlapping tasks: evidence for a central bottleneck. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[17]  A. Gordon,et al.  Choosing between movement sequences: A hierarchical editor model. , 1984 .

[18]  D. Navon Resources—a theoretical soup stone? , 1984 .

[19]  A F Sanders,et al.  There is no central stimulus encoding during saccadic eye shifts: a case against general parallel processing notions. , 1985, Acta psychologica.

[20]  C. Eriksen,et al.  A psychophysiological investigation of the continuous flow model of human information processing. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[21]  H. Pashler,et al.  Detecting conjunctions of color and form: Reassessing the serial search hypothesis , 1987, Perception & psychophysics.

[22]  D. Navon,et al.  Role of outcome conflict in dual-task interference. , 1987, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[23]  J. Wandmacher,et al.  On the generality of logical recoding in spatial interference tasks. , 1987, Acta psychologica.

[24]  J. C. Johnston,et al.  Chronometric Evidence for Central Postponement in Temporally Overlapping Tasks , 2003 .

[25]  A. Osman,et al.  Dimensional overlap: cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility--a model and taxonomy. , 1990, Psychological review.

[26]  H Pashler,et al.  Making two responses to a single object: implications for the central attentional bottleneck. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[27]  H. Pashler Dual-task interference and elementary mental mechanisms , 1993 .

[28]  J. Seal,et al.  Intensity to force translation: a new effect of stimulus-response compatibility revealed by analysis of response time and electromyographic activity of a prime mover. , 1993, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[29]  Ritske de Jong,et al.  Multiple bottlenecks in overlapping task performance , 1993 .

[30]  H. Pashler Dual-task interference in simple tasks: data and theory. , 1994, Psychological bulletin.

[31]  E. Lauber,et al.  Conditional and unconditional automaticity: a dual-process model of effects of spatial stimulus-response correspondence. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[32]  H. Pashler,et al.  Graded capacity-sharing in dual-task interference? , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[33]  R. Proctor,et al.  Processing of an irrelevant location dimension as a function of the relevant stimulus dimension. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[34]  D. Glencross,et al.  The Coordination of Bimanual Synchronous and Alternating Tapping Sequences , 1995 .

[35]  R. Proctor,et al.  The influence of irrelevant location information on performance: A review of the Simon and spatial Stroop effects , 1995, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[36]  Jennifer M. Glass,et al.  Adaptive executive control: Flexible multiple-task performance without pervasive immutable response-selection bottlenecks , 1995 .

[37]  Will Spijkers,et al.  Structural Constraints on the Performance of Symmetrical Bimanual Movements with Different Amplitudes , 1995 .

[38]  W. Sommer,et al.  Partial advance information and response preparation: inferences from the lateralized readiness potential. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[39]  E A Franz,et al.  Spatial Coupling in the Coordination of Complex Actions , 1997, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[40]  D E Kieras,et al.  A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple-task performance: Part 1. Basic mechanisms. , 1997, Psychological review.

[41]  Asher Cohen,et al.  Perceptual Dimensional Constraints in Response Selection Processes , 1997, Cognitive Psychology.

[42]  David E. Kieras,et al.  A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple-task performance: Part 2. Accounts of psychological refractory-period phenomena. , 1997 .

[43]  J Miller,et al.  Effects of stimulus duration and intensity on simple reaction time and response force. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[44]  J. C. Johnston,et al.  Attentional limitations in dual-task performance. , 1998 .

[45]  Between-dimension flanker effects: A clarification with encouraging implications , 1998 .

[46]  B. Hommel Automatic stimulus-response translation in dual-task performance. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[47]  Ian M. Franks,et al.  Dual-task interference as an indicator of on-line programming in simple movement sequences , 1999 .

[48]  S. Hackley,et al.  Accessory Stimulus Effects on Response Selection: Does Arousal Speed Decision Making? , 1999, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[49]  Bernhard Hommel,et al.  Action planning and the temporal binding of response codes , 1999 .

[50]  Pierre Jolicoeur,et al.  Concurrent response-selection demands modulate the attentional blink , 1999 .

[51]  R W Proctor,et al.  Multiple spatial correspondence effects on dual-task performance. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[52]  W Spijkers,et al.  Specification of movement amplitudes for the left and right hands: evidence for transient parametric coupling from overlapping-task performance. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[53]  G D Logan,et al.  Parallel memory retrieval in dual-task situations: I. Semantic memory. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[54]  Harry Zhang,et al.  The Simon effect and its reversal in three-choice Hedge and Marsh tasks: evidence for irrelevant stimulus-response compatibility and stimulus congruity. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[55]  J. Driver,et al.  Control of Cognitive Processes: Attention and Performance XVIII , 2000 .

[56]  R. D. Gordon,et al.  Executive control of visual attention in dual-task situations. , 2001, Psychological review.

[57]  J. C. Johnston,et al.  Why practice reduces dual-task interference. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[58]  G D Logan,et al.  Parallel memory retrieval in dual-task situations: II. Episodic memory. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[59]  A M Wing,et al.  Brief bimanual force pulses: correlations between the hands in force and time. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[60]  J. Miller,et al.  Motor processes in simple, go/no-go, and choice reaction time tasks: a psychophysiological analysis. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[61]  Bernhard Hommel,et al.  Visual attention and manual response selection: Distinct mechanisms operating on the same codes , 2002 .

[62]  J. Duncan,et al.  Separate and Shared Sources of Dual-Task Cost in Stimulus Identification and Response Selection , 2002, Cognitive Psychology.

[63]  D. Navon,et al.  Queuing or Sharing? A Critical Evaluation of the Single-Bottleneck Notion , 2002, Cognitive Psychology.

[64]  Stimulus-response compatibility in intensity-force relations , 2002, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[65]  Bernhard Hommel,et al.  Control of stimulus-response translation in dual-task performance , 2002, Psychological research.

[66]  Kin Fai Ellick Wong The Relationship between Attentional Blink and Psychological Refractory Period , 2002 .

[67]  P. Jolicoeur,et al.  A central capacity sharing model of dual-task performance. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[68]  Jeff Miller,et al.  Backward crosstalk effects in psychological refractory period paradigms: effects of second-task response types on first-task response latencies , 2006, Psychological research.