A multiobjective approach to resource management in smart grid

A multiobjective (MO) approach is proposed for resource management in the smart grid. The resource management problem is formulated via a state-space model. The grid performance is optimized and the distribution cost of resources is minimized, yielding an MO optimization problem. An H∞ design is adopted to address grid disturbances, and linear matrix inequality approaches are used to render the MO problem numerically solvable. An algorithm that integrates deterministic and stochastic mechanisms is presented. By using the algorithm, an approximated Pareto front (APF) can be obtained. The resources in the smart grid can thus be managed by choosing one of the trade-off strategies represented by nondominated vectors on the APF. In contrast with a single-objective approach, the proposed MO approach provides a grid designer with a broad perspective on optimality, which clearly illustrates how one objective affects the other. Simulations show that by using the MO approach, the distribution cost can be significantly reduced with moderate degradation of the grid performance.

[1]  S. Vadhva,et al.  Smart grid, Distributed Generation, and standards , 2011, 2011 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting.

[2]  M. Liserre,et al.  Future Energy Systems: Integrating Renewable Energy Sources into the Smart Power Grid Through Industrial Electronics , 2010, IEEE Industrial Electronics Magazine.

[3]  W. S. Mota,et al.  Stability analysis of interconnected power systems coupled with market dynamics , 2001, 2002 IEEE Power Engineering Society Winter Meeting. Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.02CH37309).

[4]  Bor-Sen Chen,et al.  A Multiobjective Approach for Source Estimation in Fuzzy Networked Systems , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I: Regular Papers.

[5]  Husheng Li,et al.  Communication Requirement for Reliable and Secure State Estimation and Control in Smart Grid , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[6]  F. Alvarado,et al.  Stability Analysis of Interconnected Power Systems Coupled with Market Dynamics , 2001, IEEE Power Engineering Review.

[7]  Riccardo Minciardi,et al.  Optimal Control in a Cooperative Network of Smart Power Grids , 2012, IEEE Systems Journal.

[8]  P. Gahinet,et al.  A linear matrix inequality approach to H∞ control , 1994 .

[9]  H. Vincent Poor,et al.  Demand-side energy storage system management in smart grid , 2012, 2012 IEEE Third International Conference on Smart Grid Communications (SmartGridComm).

[10]  Wei-Yu Chiu Pareto optimal controller designs in differential games , 2014, 2014 CACS International Automatic Control Conference (CACS 2014).

[11]  Yong Fu,et al.  Dynamic Energy Management for the Smart Grid With Distributed Energy Resources , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[12]  Stephen P. Boyd,et al.  Convex Optimization , 2004, Algorithms and Theory of Computation Handbook.

[13]  H. Vincent Poor,et al.  Robust power flow control in smart grids with fluctuating effects , 2012, 2012 Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM Workshops.

[14]  H. Vincent Poor,et al.  Energy Imbalance Management Using a Robust Pricing Scheme , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[15]  H. Morais,et al.  Technical and economic resources management in smart grids using heuristic optimization methods , 2010, IEEE PES General Meeting.

[16]  J. Nutaro,et al.  The Impact of Market Clearing Time and Price Signal Delay on the Stability of Electric Power Markets , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.