The relation of learners’ motivation with the process of collaborative scientific discovery learning

In this study, we investigated the influence of individual learners’ motivation on the collaborative discovery learning process. In this we distinguished the motivation of the individual learners and had eye for the composition of groups, which could be homogeneous or heterogeneous in terms of motivation. The study involved 73 dyads of 10th‐grade learners. Learners worked in dyads on separate screens in a shared discovery learning environment. They communicated using a chat box. A self‐report questionnaire was used to measure the motivational beliefs of learners. We used on‐line measures to measure communicative and discovery activities of the learners. Task value seems to be an important motivational construct with regard to the composition of dyads. The results show that the performance of a dyad existing of a highly and a lowly motivated learner can be influenced positively by the highly motivated peer.

[1]  Ton de Jong,et al.  Co-Lab: research and development of an online learning environment for collaborative scientific discovery learning , 2005, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[2]  P. Kutnick,et al.  Toward a social pedagogy of classroom group work , 2003 .

[3]  T. Goetz,et al.  Academic Emotions in Students' Self-Regulated Learning and Achievement: A Program of Qualitative and Quantitative Research , 2002 .

[4]  Ann C. Jones,et al.  Learning technologies: Affective and social issues in computer-supported collaborative learning , 2005, Comput. Educ..

[5]  Brian P. Coppola,et al.  Skill and will: The role of motivation and cognition in the learning of college chemistry , 2003 .

[6]  E. Deci,et al.  Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. , 2000, The American psychologist.

[7]  Barbara A. Greene,et al.  Influences on achievement : Goals, perceived ability, and cognitive engagement , 1996 .

[8]  Neil Mercer,et al.  Using Computer-based Text Analysis to Integrate Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Research on Collaborative Learning , 1997 .

[9]  J. Eccles,et al.  Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. , 2002, Annual review of psychology.

[10]  Jonathan A. Rhoades,et al.  Interaction process in computer-mediated and face-to-face groups , 1995, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[11]  Namok Choi,et al.  Self‐efficacy and self‐concept as predictors of college students' academic performance , 2005 .

[12]  Ton de Jong,et al.  Scientific Discovery Learning with Computer Simulations of Conceptual Domains , 1998 .

[13]  Barbara A. Greene,et al.  Predicting high school students' cognitive engagement and achievement: Contributions of classroom perceptions and motivation , 2004 .

[14]  John T. E. Richardson,et al.  Methodological Issues in Questionnaire-Based Research on Student Learning in Higher Education , 2004 .

[15]  P. Pintrich,et al.  Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. , 1990 .

[16]  A. Bandura.  Social Cognitive Theory of Mass Communication , 2001 .

[17]  Neil Mercer,et al.  Computers and Reasoning Through Talk in the Classroom , 1996 .

[18]  T. Jong,et al.  Exploratory learning with a computer simulation for control theory: learning processes and instructional support , 1993 .

[19]  Nadira Saab,et al.  Chat and explore : the role of support and motivation in collaborative scientific discovery learning , 2005 .

[20]  Elizabeth A. Linnenbrink,et al.  Motivation as an Enabler for Academic Success , 2002 .

[21]  Gerry Stahl,et al.  Group cognition in computer-assisted collaborative learning , 2005, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[22]  W. R. van Joolingen,et al.  SimQuest: authoring educational simulations. , 2003 .

[23]  W. Joolingen,et al.  Motivation and performance within a collaborative computer-based modeling task: relations between students’ achievement goal orientation, self-efficacy, cognitive processing, and achievement , 2008 .

[24]  Carol K. K. Chan,et al.  Knowledge Building as a Mediator of Conflict in Conceptual Change , 1997 .

[25]  B. Zimmerman,et al.  Social Origins of Self-Regulatory Competence , 1997 .

[26]  J. Eccles,et al.  Expectancy-Value Theory of Achievement Motivation. , 2000, Contemporary educational psychology.

[27]  E. Paice,et al.  Collaborative learning , 2003, Medical education.

[28]  P. Pintrich,et al.  Reliability and Predictive Validity of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (Mslq) , 1993 .

[29]  Nadira Saab,et al.  Communication in collaborative discovery learning. , 2005, The British journal of educational psychology.

[30]  A. Bandura.  Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory , 1985 .

[31]  A. Elliot.  Approach and avoidance motivation and achievement goals , 1999 .

[32]  B. Zimmerman,et al.  Self-Efficacy: An Essential Motive to Learn. , 2000, Contemporary educational psychology.

[33]  Ton de Jong,et al.  Issues in computer supported inquiry learning in science , 2007, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[34]  Nadira Saab,et al.  Supporting Communication in a Collaborative Discovery Learning Environment: the Effect of Instruction , 2007 .

[35]  P. Pintrich,et al.  An Achievement Goal Theory Perspective on Issues in Motivation Terminology, Theory, and Research. , 2000, Contemporary educational psychology.

[36]  M. Bruinsma,et al.  Motivation, cognitive processing and achievement in higher education , 2004 .

[37]  B. Zimmerman.  Academic studing and the development of personal skill: A self-regulatory perspective , 1998 .

[38]  RUPERT WEGERIF,et al.  Using computers to help coach exploratory talk across the curriculum , 1996, Comput. Educ..

[39]  David W. Johnson,et al.  Student motivation in co-operative groups: social interdependence theory , 2003 .

[40]  M. Covington.  Goal theory, motivation, and school achievement: an integrative review. , 2000, Annual review of psychology.