Understanding Problems of Practice

Classroom practitioners are often asked to adopt continually changing standards, to be collaborators and reflective practitioners, and to make new and evolving technologies an integral part of their practice. Understanding Problems of Practice: A Case Study in Design Research describes a process for thinking about and reflecting on innovative practice – the design research process. Each of the five phases of the design research process is exemplified by a discussion of how the authors used this process to create a technology education course for perspective secondary educators. In Chap. 2, the authors explore the central role understanding a problem of practice plays as the first phase in the design research process. They present the need to establish and understand the magnitude, importance, and urgency of the problem before investing time and energy to solve the problem. They present strategies useful for understanding a problem of practice including asking a series of questions to establish the need for a solution and to contextualize the problem by identifying possibilities and constraints. Next, they briefly explore techniques used by design researchers to gather information to construct a rigorous and viable understanding of the problem. They conclude the chapter by presenting the first design research phase of a case study to create a technology education course for perspective secondary educators, focusing on the ways in which they as classroom practitioners used a literature review and a review of their personal knowledge to understand the problem and derive initial design decisions.

[1]  L. Shulman Knowledge and Teaching: Foundations of the New Reform , 1987 .

[2]  Thomas A. Brush,et al.  Integrating technology into K-12 teaching and learning: current knowledge gaps and recommendations for future research , 2007 .

[3]  C. Maddux,et al.  Fad, Fashion, and the Weak Role of Theory and Research in Information Technology in Education. , 2004 .

[4]  Developing Students' “Habits of Mind” in a Mathematics Program , 2009 .

[5]  Susan McKenney,et al.  Conducting Educational Design Research , 2012 .

[6]  Brenda Bannan-Ritland,et al.  The Role of Design in Research: The Integrative Learning Design Framework , 2003 .

[7]  Howard Gardner,et al.  The Five Minds for the Future , 2008, Schools.

[8]  T. Campbell,et al.  An investigation of middle school science teachers and students use of technology inside and outside of classrooms: considering whether digital natives are more technology savvy than their teachers , 2014, Educational Technology Research and Development.

[9]  Niall Winters,et al.  Design approaches in technology-enhanced learning , 2007, Interact. Learn. Environ..

[10]  Phyllis T. H. Grummon Trends in Higher Education , 2010 .

[11]  Matt Bower,et al.  Affordance analysis – matching learning tasks with learning technologies , 2008 .

[12]  Krista Glazewski,et al.  Integrating technology in a field-based teacher training program: The PT3@ASU project , 2003 .

[13]  D. Garrison ONLINE COMMUNITY OF INQUIRY REVIEW: SOCIAL, COGNITIVE, AND TEACHING PRESENCE ISSUES , 2019, Online Learning.

[14]  Using Groups in Criminal Justice Courses: Some New Twists on a Traditional Pedagogical Tool , 2006 .

[15]  Nada H. Dabbagh,et al.  Redesigning Instruction Through Web‐Based Course Authoring Tools , 1998 .

[16]  Kathleen Cercone Characteristics of Adult Learners With Implications for Online Learning Design , 2008 .

[17]  Peggy A. Ertmer,et al.  Teacher Technology Change , 2010 .

[18]  Laura M. O’Dwyer,et al.  Examining Teacher Technology Use , 2003 .

[19]  John A. Schibrowsky,et al.  The Interdependence of the Factors Influencing the Perceived Quality of the Online Learning Experience: A Causal Model , 2007 .

[20]  Anne T. Ottenbreit-Leftwich,et al.  Equipping the Next Generation of Teachers , 2010 .

[21]  A. Su,et al.  The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics , 1932, The Mathematical Gazette.

[22]  Lisa Marie Blaschke,et al.  Creating Effective Collaborative Learning Groups in an Online Environment , 2009 .

[23]  Matthew J. Koehler,et al.  Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A Framework for Teacher Knowledge , 2006, Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education.

[24]  J. Dewey The Relation of Theory to Practice in Education. , 1904, Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education.

[25]  Wilhelmina C. Savenye,et al.  So you are going to be an online writing instructor: issues in designing, developing, and delivering an online course , 2001 .

[26]  Paris Avgeriou,et al.  Towards a Pattern Language for Networked Learning , 2004 .

[27]  Brett E. Shelton,et al.  Incentives and Disincentives for the Use of OpenCourseWare , 2009 .

[28]  S. Wineburg,et al.  Historical Thinking and Other Unnatural Acts: Charting the Future of Teaching the Past , 2002 .

[29]  Jan J. Perold,et al.  Description of novelty, novelty of description: a dialectic analysis of a Web-based course , 2003, Comput. Educ..

[30]  L. Shulman Those Who Understand: Knowledge Growth in Teaching , 1986 .

[31]  J. Polman,et al.  Developing Preservice Teachers' Pedagogical Content Knowledge about Historical Thinking. , 2008 .

[32]  R. Kay Evaluating Strategies Used To Incorporate Technology Into Preservice Education , 2006 .