Station-Keeping Underwater Gliders Using a Predictive Ocean Circulation Model and Applications to SWOT Calibration and Validation

Instrumented ocean moorings are the gold standard for gathering in situ measurements at a fixed location in the ocean. Because they require installation by a ship and must be secured to the seafloor, moorings are expensive, logistically difficult to deploy and maintain, and are constrained to one location once installed. To circumvent these issues, previous studies have attempted to utilize autonomous underwater gliders as platforms for virtual moorings, but these attempts have yielded comparatively large station-keeping errors due to the difficulty of glider control in dynamic ocean currents. We implemented an adaptive planner using a vehicle motion model and a predictive ocean circulation model to improve station-keeping performance by incorporating anticipated currents into glider control. We demonstrate improved station-keeping performance using our planner in both simulation and in-field deployment results, and report smaller average station-keeping error than the Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute's M1 mooring. Finally, we utilize our simulation framework to conduct a feasibility study on using an array of autonomous gliders as virtual moorings to conduct critical calibration and validation (CalVal) for the upcoming National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Surface Water and Ocean Topography (SWOT) Mission, instead of using permanent moorings. We show that this approach carries several advantages and has potential to meet the SWOT CalVal objectives.

[1]  G. Mellor USERS GUIDE for A THREE-DIMENSIONAL, PRIMITIVE EQUATION, NUMERICAL OCEAN MODEL , 1998 .

[2]  Yi Chao,et al.  Autonomous control of marine floats in the presence of dynamic, uncertain ocean currents , 2018, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[3]  V. Rich Personal communication , 1989, Nature.

[4]  Daniel L. Rudnick,et al.  Development, implementation, and validation of a California coastal ocean modeling, data assimilation, and forecasting system , 2017 .

[5]  Alberto Alvarez,et al.  Combining networks of drifting profiling floats and gliders for adaptive sampling of the Ocean , 2007, Proceedings 2007 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[6]  Geoffrey A. Hollinger,et al.  Planning Energy-Efficient Trajectories in Strong Disturbances , 2017, IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters.

[7]  Remy Baraille,et al.  The HYCOM (HYbrid Coordinate Ocean Model) data assimilative system , 2007 .

[8]  Brian Claus,et al.  Energy optimal depth control for long range underwater vehicles with applications to a hybrid underwater glider , 2016, Auton. Robots.

[9]  Steve Chien,et al.  Front delineation and tracking with multiple underwater vehicles , 2018, J. Field Robotics.

[10]  R. Davis,et al.  The autonomous underwater glider "Spray" , 2001 .

[11]  David M. Fratantoni,et al.  Development, implementation and evaluation of a data-assimilative ocean forecasting system off the central California coast , 2009 .

[12]  Stefan B. Williams,et al.  Large-scale path planning for Underwater Gliders in ocean currents , 2009 .

[13]  D. Rudnick Ocean Research Enabled by Underwater Gliders. , 2016, Annual review of marine science.

[14]  G. Madec NEMO ocean engine , 2008 .

[15]  C. C. Eriksen,et al.  Seaglider: a long-range autonomous underwater vehicle for oceanographic research , 2001 .

[16]  Michael Durand,et al.  The Surface Water and Ocean Topography Mission: Observing Terrestrial Surface Water and Oceanic Submesoscale Eddies , 2010, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[17]  R. Giering,et al.  Construction of the adjoint MIT ocean general circulation model and application to Atlantic heat transport sensitivity , 1999 .

[18]  Dimitris Menemenlis,et al.  An Observing System Simulation Experiment for the Calibration and Validation of the Surface Water Ocean Topography Sea Surface Height Measurement Using In Situ Platforms , 2017 .

[19]  David R. Thompson,et al.  Current-sensitive path planning for an underactuated free-floating ocean Sensorweb , 2011, 2011 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[20]  J. Sherman,et al.  High‐frequency internal waves near the Luzon Strait observed by underwater gliders , 2013 .

[21]  G. Egbert,et al.  Efficient Inverse Modeling of Barotropic Ocean Tides , 2002 .

[22]  Joshua Grady Graver,et al.  UNDERWATER GLIDERS: DYNAMICS, CONTROL AND DESIGN , 2005 .

[23]  D. C. Webb,et al.  SLOCUM: an underwater glider propelled by environmental energy , 2001 .

[24]  Allan R. Robinson Forecasting and simulating coastal ocean processes and variabilities with the Harvard Ocean Prediction System , 1999 .

[25]  C. Woolsey,et al.  Vehicle Motion in Currents , 2013, IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering.

[26]  E. Rogers,et al.  The NCEP North American Mesoscale Modeling System : Recent changes and future plans , 2009 .

[27]  David R. Thompson,et al.  Spatiotemporal path planning in strong, dynamic, uncertain currents , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[28]  D. Fratantoni,et al.  A thin layer of phytoplankton observed in the Philippine Sea with a synthetic moored array of autonomous gliders , 2009 .

[29]  Naomi Ehrich Leonard,et al.  Coordinated control of an underwater glider fleet in an adaptive ocean sampling field experiment in Monterey Bay , 2010, J. Field Robotics.

[30]  Geoffrey A. Hollinger,et al.  Risk‐aware Path Planning for Autonomous Underwater Vehicles using Predictive Ocean Models , 2013, J. Field Robotics.