An ML-Based Estimate and the Cramer-Rao Bound for Data-Aided Channel Estimation in KSP-OFDM

We consider the Cramer-Rao bound (CRB) for data-aided channel estimation for OFDM with known symbol padding (KSP-OFDM). The pilot symbols used to estimate the channel are positioned not only in the guard interval but also on some of the OFDM carriers, in order to improve the estimation accuracy for a given guard interval length. As the true CRB is very hard to evaluate, we derive an approximate analytical expression for the CRB, that is, the Gaussian CRB (GCRB), which is accurate for large block sizes. This derivation involves an invertible linear transformation of the received samples, yielding an observation vector of which a number of components are (nearly) independent of the unknown information-bearing data symbols. The low SNR limit of the GCRB is obtained by ignoring the presence of the data symbols in the received signals. At high SNR, the GCRB is mainly determined by the observations that are (nearly) independent of the data symbols; the additional information provided by the other observations is negligible. Both SNR limits are inversely proportional to the SNR. The GCRB is essentially independent of the FFT size and the used pilot sequence, and inversely proportional to the number of pilots. For a given number of pilot symbols, the CRB slightly increases with the guard interval length. Further, a low complexity ML-based channel estimator is derived from the observation subset that is (nearly) independent of the data symbols. Although this estimator exploits only a part of the observation, its mean-squared error (MSE) performance is close the CRB for a large range of SNR. However, at high SNR, the MSE reaches an error floor caused by the residual presence of data symbols in the considered observation subset.

[1]  Luc Deneire,et al.  Training sequence versus cyclic prefix-a new look on single carrier communication , 2001, IEEE Communications Letters.

[2]  Marc Moonen,et al.  Efficient equalizers for single and multi-carrier environments with known symbol padding , 2001, Proceedings of the Sixth International Symposium on Signal Processing and its Applications (Cat.No.01EX467).

[3]  A. Gualtierotti H. L. Van Trees, Detection, Estimation, and Modulation Theory, , 1976 .

[4]  Marc Moonen,et al.  Estimation and equalization of doubly selective channels using known symbol padding , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[5]  Heidi Steendam,et al.  Different Guard Interval Techniques for OFDM: Performance Comparison , 2007, MCSS.

[6]  Fredrik Tufvesson,et al.  Pilot assisted channel estimation for OFDM in mobile cellular systems , 1997, 1997 IEEE 47th Vehicular Technology Conference. Technology in Motion.

[7]  Donald C. Cox,et al.  Robust frequency and timing synchronization for OFDM , 1997, IEEE Trans. Commun..

[8]  Harry L. Van Trees,et al.  Detection, Estimation, and Modulation Theory: Radar-Sonar Signal Processing and Gaussian Signals in Noise , 1992 .

[9]  Georgios B. Giannakis,et al.  Cyclic prefixing or zero padding for wireless multicarrier transmissions? , 2002, IEEE Trans. Commun..

[10]  Marc Moonen,et al.  A suboptimal Iterative Method for Maximum-Likelihood Sequence Estimation in a Multipath Context , 2003, EURASIP J. Adv. Signal Process..

[11]  Umberto Mengali,et al.  Synchronization Techniques for Digital Receivers , 1997, Applications of Communications Theory.

[12]  J.A.C. Bingham,et al.  Multicarrier modulation for data transmission: an idea whose time has come , 1990, IEEE Communications Magazine.