Characterizing Learning Mediated by Mobile Technologies: A Cultural-Historical Activity Theoretical Analysis

Mobile technologies have not yet triggered the knowledge revolution in schools anticipated, in particular, by the telecommunications industry. On the contrary, mobile technologies remain extensively used outside the frontiers of formal education. The reasons for this are many and varied. In this paper, we concentrate on those associated with the prevalent methodological weakness in the study of innovative educational interventions with mobile technologies. In this context, the paper investigates the following question: what is the potential of second-generation cultural-historical activity theory (CHAT) for characterizing learning activities mediated by mobile technologies? To this end, an empirical study was designed with the goal of examining five small groups of students (fifth grade, age 12) who were using mobile devices in authentic educational settings, within a natural science inquiry-based learning activity outdoors. Second-generation CHAT was operationalized as an analytical and dialectic methodological framework for understanding learning activities mediated by mobile devices. The study contributes a characterization of mobile learning and identification of constraints and transformations introduced by mobile technology into students' tasks.

[1]  Mike Sharples,et al.  Challenges in Evaluating Mobile Learning , 2008 .

[2]  Gwo-Jen Hwang,et al.  A two-tier test approach to developing location-aware mobile learning systems for natural science courses , 2010, Comput. Educ..

[3]  H. Daniels.  Vygotsky and Pedagogy , 2001 .

[4]  David Buckingham,et al.  Digital generations : children, young people, and new media , 2006 .

[5]  P. Rabardel.  Les hommes et les technologies; approche cognitive des instruments contemporains , 1995 .

[6]  Roy D. Pea,et al.  Addressing the Challenges of Inquiry-Based Learning Through Technology and Curriculum Design , 1999 .

[7]  Jang-Ping Sheu,et al.  A mobile butterfly-watching learning system for supporting independent learning , 2004, The 2nd IEEE International Workshop on Wireless and Mobile Technologies in Education, 2004. Proceedings..

[8]  Robert Ramberg,et al.  Using Smartphones and QR Codes for Supporting Students in Exploring Tree Species , 2013, EC-TEL.

[9]  Karwan Zetali,et al.  Mobile Inquiry-Based Learning - A Study of Collaborative Scaffolding and Performance , 2013, HCI.

[10]  Mike Sharples,et al.  A theory of learning for the mobile age: learning through conversation and exploration across contexts , 2010 .

[11]  Sue Timmis,et al.  The dialectical potential of Cultural Historical Activity Theory for researching sustainable CSCL practices , 2014, Int. J. Comput. Support. Collab. Learn..

[12]  David W. Johnson,et al.  The Internal Dynamics of Cooperative Learning Groups , 1985 .

[13]  Y. Engeström,et al.  Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research , 2014 .

[14]  A. N. Leont’ev.  The Problem of Activity in Psychology , 1974 .

[15]  Neil Selwyn,et al.  Looking beyond learning: notes towards the critical study of educational technology , 2010, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[16]  David H. Jonassen,et al.  Revisiting activity theory as a framework for designing student-centered learning environments , 2014 .

[17]  John B. Shoven,et al.  I , Edinburgh Medical and Surgical Journal.

[18]  Jürgen Jarosch,et al.  Mobile Learning , 2014, HMD Praxis der Wirtschaftsinformatik.

[19]  Yvonne Rogers,et al.  Things aren't what they seem to be: innovation through technology inspiration , 2002, DIS '02.

[20]  Wolff‐Michael Roth,et al.  “Vygotsky’s Neglected Legacy”: Cultural-Historical Activity Theory , 2007 .

[21]  Luisa Panichi,et al.  On the issue of quality of experience in technology supported learning , 2010 .

[22]  W. Marsden.  I and J , 2012 .

[23]  Yrjö Engeström,et al.  From Learning Environments and Implementation to Activity Systems and Expansive Learning , 2009 .

[24]  Marcelo Milrad,et al.  The Genesis and Development of Mobile Learning in Europe , 2011 .

[25]  Daisy Mwanza-Simwami,et al.  Using activity-oriented design methods (AODM) to investigatemobile learning , 2009 .

[26]  Jalal Nouri.  Eliciting the potentials of mathematical mobile learning through scaffolding learning processes across contexts , 2012, Int. J. Mob. Learn. Organisation.

[27]  Sten R. Ludvigsen,et al.  The Hedgehog and the Fox: A Discussion of the Approaches to the Analysis of ICT Reforms in Teacher Education of Larry Cuban and Yrjö Engeström , 2009 .

[28]  Simon Dunstall,et al.  Cognitive analysis of collaboration as an activity , 2005 .

[29]  W. R. Howard.  Acting with Technology: Activity Theory and Interaction Design , 2007 .

[30]  Giasemi N. Vavoula,et al.  Literature Review in Mobile Technologies and Learning , 2004 .

[31]  P. Cowan,et al.  Using Activity Theory to Problematize the Role of the Teacher During Mobile Learning , 2013 .

[32]  Mike Sharples,et al.  Meeting the Challenges in Evaluating Mobile Learning: A 3-Level Evaluation Framework , 2009, Int. J. Mob. Blended Learn..

[33]  Inmaculada Arnedillo-Sánchez,et al.  Mobile Learning [Guest editor's introduction] , 2007 .

[34]  J. Bruner,et al.  The role of tutoring in problem solving. , 1976, Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines.

[35]  Miguel Nussbaum,et al.  A conceptual framework based on Activity Theory for mobile CSCL , 2007, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[36]  Lev Vygotsky.  Mind in society , 1978 .