A compromise solution approach for finding common weights in DEA: an improvement to Kao and Hung's approach

Data envelopment analysis (DEA) is the leading technique for measuring the relative efficiency of decision-making units (DMUs) on the basis of multiple inputs and multiple outputs. In this technique, the weights for inputs and outputs are estimated in the best advantage for each unit so as to maximize its relative efficiency. But, this flexibility in selecting the weights deters the comparison among DMUs on a common base. For dealing with this difficulty, Kao and Hung (2005) proposed a compromise solution approach for generating common weights under the DEA framework. The proposed multiple criteria decision-making (MCDM) model was derived from the original non-linear DEA model. This paper presents an improvement to Kao and Hung's approach by means of introducing an MCDM model which is derived from a new linear DEA model.

[1]  B. Golany,et al.  Controlling Factor Weights in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1991 .

[2]  Francisco Pedraja-Chaparro,et al.  On the Role of Weight Restrictions in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1997 .

[3]  K. B. Williams,et al.  Management Models and Industrial Applications of Linear Programming , 1962 .

[4]  Antreas D. Athanassopoulos,et al.  Assessing the relative efficiency of decision making units using DEA models with weight restrictions , 1998, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[5]  John E. Beasley,et al.  Restricting Weight Flexibility in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1990 .

[6]  Marcos Pereira Estellita Lins,et al.  A multi-objective approach to determine alternative targets in data envelopment analysis , 2004, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[7]  W. Cook,et al.  A data envelopment model for aggregating preference rankings , 1990 .

[8]  A. U.S.,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 2003 .

[9]  Boaz Golany,et al.  An Interactive MOLP Procedure for the Extension of DEA to Effectiveness Analysis , 1988 .

[10]  F. Hosseinzadeh Lotfi,et al.  A note on some of DEA models and finding efficiency and complete ranking using common set of weights , 2005, Appl. Math. Comput..

[11]  Denis Bouyssou,et al.  Using DEA as a tool for MCDM: some remarks , 1999, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[12]  Pekka Korhonen,et al.  Structural Comparison of Data Envelopment Analysis and Multiple Objective Linear Programming , 1998 .

[13]  B. Golany,et al.  Alternate methods of treating factor weights in DEA , 1993 .

[14]  Gary R. Reeves,et al.  A multiple criteria approach to data envelopment analysis , 1999, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[15]  Emmanuel Thanassoulis,et al.  Weights restrictions and value judgements in Data Envelopment Analysis: Evolution, development and future directions , 1997, Ann. Oper. Res..

[16]  D Giokas The use of goal programming and data envelopment analysis for estimating efficient marginal costs of outputs , 1997 .

[17]  J. S. H. Kornbluth,et al.  Analysing Policy Effectiveness Using Cone Restricted Data Envelopment Analysis , 1991 .

[18]  E. E. Karsak *,et al.  Practical common weight multi-criteria decision-making approach with an improved discriminating power for technology selection , 2005 .

[19]  Victor V. Podinovski Validating absolute weight bounds in Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) models , 2001, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[20]  Gang Yu,et al.  A goal programming-discriminant function approach to the estimation of an empirical production function based on DEA results , 1995 .

[21]  Theodor J. Stewart,et al.  Relationships between Data Envelopment Analysis and Multicriteria Decision Analysis , 1996 .

[22]  Rodney H. Green,et al.  Efficiency and Cross-efficiency in DEA: Derivations, Meanings and Uses , 1994 .

[23]  William W. Cooper,et al.  Sensitivity and Stability Analysis in DEA: Some Recent Developments , 2001 .

[24]  C. Kao,et al.  Data envelopment analysis with common weights: the compromise solution approach , 2005, J. Oper. Res. Soc..