Corporate Social Performance as a Business Strategy

Having the ambition to contribute to the practical value of the theory on corporate social performance (CSP), this paper approaches the question whether CSP can contribute to the competitive advantage of firms. We adopted an explorative case-study methodology to explore the variety of positive and negative effects of CSP on the competitiveness of organizations. As this study aimed at identifying as great variety of these effects as possible, we selected a diversified group of respondents. Data was thus collected through embedded units of analysis in a petrochemical company, and triangulated with the opinions of experts on CSP. Overall, we found various positive and negative effects of CSP on the competitiveness of organizations. CSP is therefore not an innocent adventure for executives, but rather a strategy for achieving corporate objectives. If not carefully implemented, the CSP strategy may harm the competitive advantage of the firm, as our results have suggested.

[1]  J. Boatright.  BUSINESS ETHICS AND THE THEORY OF THE FIRM , 1996 .

[2]  Shawn L. Berman,et al.  A Brand New Brand of Corporate Social Performance , 2000 .

[3]  I. Jawahar,et al.  Toward a Descriptive Stakeholder Theory: an Organizational Life Cycle Approach , 2001 .

[4]  C. Fombrun,et al.  Opportunity Platforms and Safety Nets: Corporate Citizenship and Reputational Risk , 2024, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[5]  D. Turban,et al.  Corporate Social Performance As a Competitive Advantage in Attracting a Quality Workforce , 2000 .

[6]  J. Barney.  Resource-based theories of competitive advantage: A ten-year retrospective on the resource-based view , 2001 .

[7]  M. Clarkson.  A Stakeholder Framework for Analyzing and Evaluating Corporate Social Performance , 1995 .

[8]  A. Heene,et al.  Managing the reputation of restructuring corporations: send the right signal to the right stakeholder , 2004 .

[9]  J. D. Margolis,et al.  Misery Loves Companies: Rethinking Social Initiatives by Business , 2003 .

[10]  James A. Mirrlees,et al.  Information and Incentives: The Economics of Carrots and Sticks , 1997 .

[11]  D. Wood.  Theory and Integrity in Business and Society , 2000 .

[12]  Pieter C. Arlow,et al.  Social Responsiveness, Corporate Structure, and Economic Performance , 1982 .

[13]  J. Logsdon,et al.  How corporate social responsibility pays off , 1996 .

[14]  Henry Mintzberg.  Musings on management. Ten ideas designed to rile everyone who cares about management. , 1996, Harvard business review.

[15]  D. Turban,et al.  Corporate Social Performance And Organizational Attractiveness To Prospective Employees , 1997 .

[16]  A. Zaheer,et al.  Bridging ties: a source of firm heterogeneity in competitive capabilities , 1999 .

[17]  Donna M. Randall,et al.  The social desirability response bias in ethics research , 1991 .

[18]  J. Dutton.  PATTERNS OF INTEREST AROUND ISSUES: THE ROLE OF UNCERTAINTY AND FEASIBILITY , 1988 .

[19]  David Bruce Allen,et al.  Strategic Corporate Social Responsibility and Value Creation Among Large Firms in Spain , 2004 .

[20]  G. Keim,et al.  Corporate Social Responsibility: An Assessment of the Enlightened Self-Interest Model , 1978 .

[21]  B. Wernerfelt,et al.  A Resource-Based View of the Firm , 1984 .

[22]  Roger E. Meiners,et al.  Corporate Contributions: Altruistic or For-Profit? , 1982 .

[23]  A. Hillman,et al.  Shareholder value, stakeholder management, and social issues: what's the bottom line? , 2001 .

[24]  M. Porter.  What is strategy , 2000 .

[25]  M. Friedman,et al.  Capitalism and Freedom , 1963 .

[26]  R. Yin.  Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[27]  Dennis A. Gioia,et al.  Practicability, Paradigms, and Problems in Stakeholder Theorizing , 1999 .

[28]  Jörgen Sandberg.  Understanding Human Competence at Work: An Interpretative Approach , 2000 .

[29]  C. Fombrun,et al.  What's in a Name? Reputation Building and Corporate Strategy , 1990 .

[30]  J. D. Margolis,et al.  People and profits? : the search for a link between a company's social and financial performance , 2001 .

[31]  Robert N. Stern,et al.  The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. , 1979 .

[32]  Robert K. Yin,et al.  Applications of case study research , 1993 .

[33]  Karl Heiner,et al.  Exploringthe Relationship Between Corporate Social Performance and Employer Attractiveness , 2002 .

[34]  Ann Buchholtz,et al.  Philanthropy as Strategy , 2003 .

[35]  S. Hart,et al.  Engaging fringe stakeholders for competitive imagination , 2004, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[36]  R. Daft,et al.  Toward a Model of Organizations as Interpretation Systems , 1984 .

[37]  A. Carroll.  A Three-Dimensional Conceptual Model of Corporate Performance , 1979 .

[38]  Michael A. Hitt,et al.  Theory and research in strategic management: Swings of a pendulum , 1999 .

[39]  Jeff Frooman.  Stakeholder Influence Strategies , 1999 .

[40]  C. Shapiro.  Premiums for High Quality Products as Returns to Reputations , 1983 .

[41]  George A. Akerlof.  The Market for “Lemons”: Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism , 1970 .

[42]  Jeanne Liedtka,et al.  Stakeholder capitalism and the value chain , 1997 .

[43]  Lois A. Mohr,et al.  Do Consumers Expect Companies to Be Socially Responsible? the Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on Buying Behavior , 2001 .

[44]  C. Fombrun,et al.  USA: For Better or Worse — The Most Visible American Corporate Reputations , 2002 .

[45]  A. Strauss,et al.  The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research aldine de gruyter , 1968 .

[46]  J. Mahon,et al.  The Corporate Social Performance and Corporate Financial Performance Debate , 1997 .

[47]  J. Barney.  Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[48]  J. Stiglitz.  The Contributions of the Economics of Information to Twentieth Century Economics , 2000 .

[49]  P. Heugens.  Strategic Issues Management: Implications for Corporate Performance , 2001 .