Effect of selumetinib vs chemotherapy on progression-free survival in uveal melanoma: a randomized clinical trial.

IMPORTANCE Uveal melanoma is characterized by mutations in GNAQ and GNA11, resulting in mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway activation. OBJECTIVE To assess the efficacy of selumetinib, a selective, non-adenosine triphosphate competitive inhibitor of MEK1 and MEK2, in uveal melanoma. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Randomized, open-label, phase 2 clinical trial comparing selumetinib vs chemotherapy conducted from August 2010 through December 2013 among 120 patients with metastatic uveal melanoma at 15 academic oncology centers in the United States and Canada. INTERVENTIONS One hundred one patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive selumetinib, 75 mg orally twice daily on a continual basis (n = 50), or chemotherapy (temozolomide, 150 mg/m2 orally daily for 5 of every 28 days, or dacarbazine, 1000 mg/m2 intravenously every 21 days [investigator choice]; n = 51) until disease progression, death, intolerable adverse effects, or withdrawal of consent. After primary outcome analysis, 19 patients were registered and 18 treated with selumetinib without randomization to complete the planned 120-patient enrollment. Patients in the chemotherapy group could receive selumetinib at the time of radiographic progression. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Progression-free survival, the primary end point, was assessed as of April 22, 2013. Additional end points, including overall survival, response rate, and safety/toxicity, were assessed as of December 31, 2013. RESULTS Median progression-free survival among patients randomized to chemotherapy was 7 weeks (95% CI, 4.3-8.4 weeks; median treatment duration, 8 weeks; interquartile range [IQR], 4.3-16 weeks) and among those randomized to selumetinib was 15.9 weeks (95% CI, 8.4-21.1 weeks; median treatment duration, 16.1 weeks; IQR, 8.1-25.3 weeks) (hazard ratio, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.30-0.71; P < .001). Median overall survival time was 9.1 months (95% CI, 6.1-11.1 months) with chemotherapy and 11.8 months (95% CI, 9.8-15.7 months) with selumetinib (hazard ratio, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.41-1.06; P = .09). No objective responses were observed with chemotherapy. Forty-nine percent of patients treated with selumetinib achieved tumor regression, with 14% achieving an objective radiographic response to therapy. Treatment-related adverse events were observed in 97% of patients treated with selumetinib, with 37% requiring at least 1 dose reduction. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this hypothesis-generating study of patients with advanced uveal melanoma, selumetinib compared with chemotherapy resulted in a modestly improved progression-free survival and response rate; however, no improvement in overall survival was observed. Improvement in clinical outcomes was accompanied by a high rate of adverse events. TRIAL REGISTRATION clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01143402.

[1]  B. Taylor,et al.  Loss of NF1 in cutaneous melanoma is associated with RAS activation and MEK dependence. , 2014, Cancer research.

[2]  Ariana Peck,et al.  Mechanism of MEK inhibition determines efficacy in mutant KRAS- versus BRAF-driven cancers , 2013, Nature.

[3]  D. Schadendorf,et al.  Selumetinib plus dacarbazine versus placebo plus dacarbazine as first-line treatment for BRAF-mutant metastatic melanoma: a phase 2 double-blind randomised study. , 2013, The Lancet. Oncology.

[4]  Suzanne F. Jones,et al.  A phase 1b study of trametinib, an oral Mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase (MEK) inhibitor, in combination with gemcitabine in advanced solid tumours. , 2013, European journal of cancer.

[5]  C. Berking,et al.  MEK162 for patients with advanced melanoma harbouring NRAS or Val600 BRAF mutations: a non-randomised, open-label phase 2 study. , 2013, The Lancet. Oncology.

[6]  G. Schwartz,et al.  Inhibition of Mutant GNAQ Signaling in Uveal Melanoma Induces AMPK-Dependent Autophagic Cell Death , 2013, Molecular Cancer Therapeutics.

[7]  S. Larson,et al.  Selumetinib-enhanced radioiodine uptake in advanced thyroid cancer. , 2013, The New England journal of medicine.

[8]  Jie Yang,et al.  MEK inhibitors reverse resistance in epidermal growth factor receptor mutation lung cancer cells with acquired resistance to gefitinib , 2013, Molecular oncology.

[9]  Lucio Crinò,et al.  Selumetinib plus docetaxel for KRAS-mutant advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a randomised, multicentre, placebo-controlled, phase 2 study. , 2013, The Lancet. Oncology.

[10]  L. Deangelis,et al.  Dropped head syndrome: Report of three cases during treatment with a MEK inhibitor , 2012, Neurology.

[11]  S. Woodman,et al.  Combination Small Molecule MEK and PI3K Inhibition Enhances Uveal Melanoma Cell Death in a Mutant GNAQ- and GNA11-Dependent Manner , 2012, Clinical Cancer Research.

[12]  L. Qin,et al.  Identification of Unique MEK-Dependent Genes in GNAQ Mutant Uveal Melanoma Involved in Cell Growth, Tumor Cell Invasion, and MEK Resistance , 2012, Clinical Cancer Research.

[13]  J. Stockman Mutations in GNA11 in Uveal Melanoma , 2012 .

[14]  Richard D Carvajal,et al.  Therapeutic Implications of the Emerging Molecular Biology of Uveal Melanoma , 2011, Clinical Cancer Research.

[15]  Paul D. Smith,et al.  The First-in-Human Study of the Hydrogen Sulfate (Hyd-Sulfate) Capsule of the MEK1/2 Inhibitor AZD6244 (ARRY-142886): A Phase I Open-Label Multicenter Trial in Patients with Advanced Cancer , 2010, Clinical Cancer Research.

[16]  G. Barsh,et al.  Frequent somatic mutations of GNAQ in uveal melanoma and blue naevi , 2010 .

[17]  M. Okada,et al.  [New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours-revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1)]. , 2009, Gan to kagaku ryoho. Cancer & chemotherapy.

[18]  M Laurin Council,et al.  Oncogenic mutations in GNAQ occur early in uveal melanoma. , 2008, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[19]  Vivienne Marsh,et al.  Biological Characterization of ARRY-142886 (AZD6244), a Potent, Highly Selective Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Kinase 1/2 Inhibitor , 2007, Clinical Cancer Research.

[20]  J. Earle,et al.  Development of metastatic disease after enrollment in the COMS trials for treatment of choroidal melanoma: Collaborative Ocular Melanoma Study Group Report No. 26. , 2005, Archives of ophthalmology.

[21]  P. Chapman,et al.  Variates of survival in metastatic uveal melanoma. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[22]  L. Tentori,et al.  Dacarbazine causes transcriptional up-regulation of interleukin 8 and vascular endothelial growth factor in melanoma cells : A possible escape mechanism from chemotherapy , 2004 .

[23]  C. Shields Incidence of Uveal Melanoma in the United States: 1973–1997 , 2003 .

[24]  A. Bedikian,et al.  Phase II evaluation of temozolomide in metastatic choroidal melanoma , 2003, Melanoma research.

[25]  R. Scully,et al.  Assessment of metastatic disease status at death in 435 patients with large choroidal melanoma in the Collaborative Ocular Melanoma Study (COMS): COMS report no. 15. , 2001, Archives of ophthalmology.

[26]  L. Karnell,et al.  The National Cancer Data Base report on cutaneous and noncutaneous melanoma , 1998, Cancer.