Development of filter functions for protein-ligand docking.

Current docking methods can generate bound conformations of a ligand close to the experimentally observed structure of a protein-ligand complex. However, the scoring functions used to evaluate the potential solutions are not yet reliable enough at giving the highest ranks to the best structure predictions. One approach to this problem is the use of filter functions that are applied to all docked conformations to remove structures with certain energetically unfavorable properties. We present a computationally efficient scheme for such a postprocessing of docking results. For each of the conformations generated for a given protein-ligand complex, four properties are calculated: the fraction of the ligand volume buried inside the binding pocket, the size of lipophilic cavities along the protein-ligand interface, the solvent-accessible surface (SAS) of nonpolar parts of the ligand, and the number of close contacts between nonhydrogen-bonded polar atoms of the ligand and the protein. These four terms were used to filter out the majority of the calculated solutions and to rescore the remaining ones. On a test set of 32 protein-ligand complexes, this protocol significantly improves the accuracy of the structure predictions.

[1]  Paul R. Gerber,et al.  MAB, a generally applicable molecular force field for structure modelling in medicinal chemistry , 1995, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[2]  A. N. Jain,et al.  Hammerhead: fast, fully automated docking of flexible ligands to protein binding sites. , 1996, Chemistry & biology.

[3]  T. N. Bhat,et al.  The Protein Data Bank , 2000, Nucleic Acids Res..

[4]  P Willett,et al.  Development and validation of a genetic algorithm for flexible docking. , 1997, Journal of molecular biology.

[5]  R. Glen,et al.  Molecular recognition of receptor sites using a genetic algorithm with a description of desolvation. , 1995, Journal of molecular biology.

[6]  Ajay N. Jain Scoring noncovalent protein-ligand interactions: A continuous differentiable function tuned to compute binding affinities , 1996, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[7]  D S Goodsell,et al.  Automated docking of flexible ligands: Applications of autodock , 1996, Journal of molecular recognition : JMR.

[8]  Thomas Lengauer,et al.  A fast flexible docking method using an incremental construction algorithm. , 1996, Journal of molecular biology.

[9]  Thomas Lengauer,et al.  Multiple automatic base selection: Protein–ligand docking based on incremental construction without manual intervention , 1997, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[10]  P Willett,et al.  Docking small-molecule ligands into active sites. , 1995, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[11]  T Lengauer,et al.  CASP2 experiences with docking flexible ligands using FLEXX , 1997, Proteins.

[12]  How many conformers are there for small n-alkanes? Consequences of asymmetric deformation in GG′ segment , 1993 .

[13]  Daniel A. Gschwend,et al.  Molecular docking towards drug discovery , 1996, Journal of molecular recognition : JMR.

[14]  G. V. Paolini,et al.  Empirical scoring functions: I. The development of a fast empirical scoring function to estimate the binding affinity of ligands in receptor complexes , 1997, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[15]  J. S. Dixon,et al.  Evaluation of the CASP2 docking section , 1997, Proteins.

[16]  Hans-Joachim Böhm,et al.  Prediction of binding constants of protein ligands: A fast method for the prioritization of hits obtained from de novo design or 3D database search programs , 1998, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[17]  Chris M. W. Ho,et al.  Cavity search: An algorithm for the isolation and display of cavity-like binding regions , 1990, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[18]  Ajay,et al.  Computational methods to predict binding free energy in ligand-receptor complexes. , 1995, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[19]  J M Blaney,et al.  A geometric approach to macromolecule-ligand interactions. , 1982, Journal of molecular biology.

[20]  G J Williams,et al.  The Protein Data Bank: a computer-based archival file for macromolecular structures. , 1977, Journal of molecular biology.

[21]  Todd J. A. Ewing,et al.  Critical evaluation of search algorithms for automated molecular docking and database screening , 1997 .

[22]  R Abagyan,et al.  Flexible protein–ligand docking by global energy optimization in internal coordinates , 1997, Proteins.

[23]  Hans-Joachim Böhm,et al.  The development of a simple empirical scoring function to estimate the binding constant for a protein-ligand complex of known three-dimensional structure , 1994, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[24]  Thomas Lengauer,et al.  Computational methods for biomolecular docking. , 1996, Current opinion in structural biology.