In vitro evaluation of a novel hemodynamically optimized trileaflet polymeric prosthetic heart valve.

Calcific aortic valve disease is the most common and life threatening form of valvular heart disease, characterized by stenosis and regurgitation, which is currently treated at the symptomatic end-stages via open-heart surgical replacement of the diseased valve with, typically, either a xenograft tissue valve or a pyrolytic carbon mechanical heart valve. These options offer the clinician a choice between structural valve deterioration and chronic anticoagulant therapy, respectively, effectively replacing one disease with another. Polymeric prosthetic heart valves (PHV) offer the promise of reducing or eliminating these complications, and they may be better suited for the new transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) procedure, which currently utilizes tissue valves. New evidence indicates that the latter may incur damage during implantation. Polymer PHVs may also be incorporated into pulsatile circulatory support devices such as total artificial heart and ventricular assist devices that currently employ mechanical PHVs. Development of polymer PHVs, however, has been slow due to the lack of sufficiently durable and biocompatible polymers. We have designed a new trileaflet polymer PHV for surgical implantation employing a novel polymer-xSIBS-that offers superior bio-stability and durability. The design of this polymer PHV was optimized for reduced stresses, improved hemodynamic performance, and reduced thrombogenicity using our device thrombogenicity emulation (DTE) methodology, the results of which have been published separately. Here we present our new design, prototype fabrication methods, hydrodynamics performance testing, and platelet activation measurements performed in the optimized valve prototype and compare it to the performance of a gold standard tissue valve. The hydrodynamic performance of the two valves was comparable in all measures, with a certain advantage to our valve during regurgitation. There was no significant difference between the platelet activation rates of our polymer valve and the tissue valve, indicating that similar to the latter, its recipients may not require anticoagulation. This work proves the feasibility of our optimized polymer PHV design and brings polymeric valves closer to clinical viability.

[1]  K. Furie,et al.  Heart disease and stroke statistics--2007 update: a report from the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. , 2008, Circulation.

[2]  N. Karak,et al.  Bio-based elastomeric hyperbranched polyurethanes for shape memory application , 2012, Iranian Polymer Journal.

[3]  S. Rahimtoola,et al.  Choice of prosthetic heart valve in adults an update. , 2010, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[4]  Patrick Bruneval,et al.  Evidence of leaflet injury during percutaneous aortic valve deployment. , 2011, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[5]  M. Xenos,et al.  Fluid structure interaction with contact surface methodology for evaluation of endovascular carotid implants for drug-resistant hypertension treatment. , 2012, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[6]  S. Deutsch,et al.  A Parametric Study of Valve Orientation on the Flow Patterns of the Penn State Pulsatile Pediatric Ventricular Assist Device , 2010, ASAIO journal.

[7]  D J Wheatley,et al.  New polyurethane heart valve prosthesis: design, manufacture and evaluation. , 1996, Biomaterials.

[8]  Shmuel Einav,et al.  Device Thrombogenicity Emulator (DTE)--design optimization methodology for cardiovascular devices: a study in two bileaflet MHV designs. , 2010, Journal of biomechanics.

[9]  Shmuel Einav,et al.  Device Thrombogenicity Emulation: A Novel Method for Optimizing Mechanical Circulatory Support Device Thromboresistance , 2012, PloS one.

[10]  Erich Wintermantel,et al.  Impairment of pericardial leaflet structure from balloon-expanded valved stents. , 2012, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[11]  Danny Bluestein,et al.  Thrombogenic Potential of Innovia Polymer Valves versus Carpentier-Edwards Perimount Magna Aortic Bioprosthetic Valves , 2011, ASAIO journal.

[12]  Dalin Tang,et al.  Multi-Physics MRI-Based Two-Layer Fluid-Structure Interaction Anisotropic Models of Human Right and Left Ventricles with Different Patch Materials: Cardiac Function Assessment and Mechanical Stress Analysis. , 2011, Computers & structures.

[13]  D. Bluestein,et al.  Development and Evaluation of a Novel Artificial Catheter-Deliverable Prosthetic Heart Valve and Method for in Vitro Testing , 2009, The International journal of artificial organs.

[14]  Miroslawa El Fray,et al.  Biocompatibility and fatigue properties of polystyrene-polyisobutylene-polystyrene, an emerging thermoplastic elastomeric biomaterial. , 2006, Biomacromolecules.

[15]  N. Duraiswamy,et al.  A Phospholipid-modified Polystyrene—Polyisobutylene— Polystyrene (SIBS) Triblock Polymer for Enhanced Hemocompatibility and Potential Use in Artificial Heart Valves , 2009, Journal of biomaterials applications.

[16]  A. Yoganathan,et al.  Comparative hydrodynamic evaluation of bioprosthetic heart valves. , 2001, The Journal of heart valve disease.

[17]  J. Runt,et al.  In vitro oxidation of high polydimethylsiloxane content biomedical polyurethanes: correlation with the microstructure. , 2008, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[18]  Benyamin Rahmani,et al.  Manufacturing and hydrodynamic assessment of a novel aortic valve made of a new nanocomposite polymer. , 2012, Journal of biomechanics.

[19]  Leonard Pinchuk,et al.  In-vivo assessment of a novel polymer (SIBS) trileaflet heart valve. , 2010, The Journal of heart valve disease.

[20]  Gaetano Burriesci,et al.  Polymeric heart valves: new materials, emerging hopes. , 2009, Trends in biotechnology.

[21]  Leonard Pinchuk,et al.  A novel polymer for potential use in a trileaflet heart valve. , 2006, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials.

[22]  Siobhain Lynn Gallocher,et al.  Durability Assessment of Polymer Trileaflet Heart Valves , 2007 .

[23]  D. Larson,et al.  CardioWest temporary total artificial heart , 2009, Perfusion.

[24]  M. Thubrikar The Aortic Valve , 1990 .

[25]  Leonard Pinchuk,et al.  Medical applications of poly(styrene-block-isobutylene-block-styrene) ("SIBS"). , 2008, Biomaterials.

[26]  J Jesty,et al.  Acetylated prothrombin as a substrate in the measurement of the procoagulant activity of platelets: elimination of the feedback activation of platelets by thrombin. , 1999, Analytical biochemistry.

[27]  Danny Bluestein,et al.  Flow-induced platelet activation in a St. Jude mechanical heart valve, a trileaflet polymeric heart valve, and a St. Jude tissue valve. , 2005, Artificial organs.

[28]  Ulrich Steinseifer,et al.  Polyurethane heart valves: past, present and future , 2011, Expert review of medical devices.

[29]  Klaus-Juergen Bathe,et al.  Nonlinear finite element analysis and adina , 1985 .

[30]  Q. Wang,et al.  A novel small animal model for biocompatibility assessment of polymeric materials for use in prosthetic heart valves. , 2009, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[31]  M. Sacks,et al.  Simulated bioprosthetic heart valve deformation under quasi-static loading. , 2005, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[32]  Andreas Franke,et al.  New flexible polymeric heart valve prostheses for the mitral and aortic positions. , 2004, The heart surgery forum.

[33]  W. Roorda,et al.  XIENCE V™ Stent Design and Rationale , 2009 .

[34]  W. O’Neill,et al.  Cost-Effectiveness of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Compared With Standard Care Among Inoperable Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis: Results From the Placement of Aortic Transcatheter Valves (PARTNER) Trial (Cohort B) , 2012, Circulation.