An Analysis of Trust Among Globally Distributed Work Teams in an Organizational Setting

Regardless of whether a project team is located in the same workplace or distributed around the world, trust remains an important element deemed necessary to facilitate knowledge sharing and collaborative work. At the same time, distribution across sites presents challenges to trust building that are not present among co-located teams. A further complicating factor in trust building among distributed teams is national culture. As we demonstrate, the impact of nationality can be increased when organizations put the distributed sites in a competitive frame. Using the Newell and Swan threefold typology of trust, this paper analyzes trust among IT work teams whose members are located at sites that are distributed in the United States, Ireland, and India. Our case analysis confirms the problematic nature of trust building among globally distributed teams. Specifically, we found that due to situational factors and socio-psychological dynamics an ‘Us versus Them’ attitude prevails among the distributed sites. This paper concludes that the traditional approaches used by organizations to address the challenges of global collaboration are insufficient and that trust building in an organizational setting requires project managers to actively work on relationship management to minimize the impact of an inter-group perspective. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  Jonathon N. Cummings,et al.  Tie and Network Correlates of Individual Performance in Knowledge-Intensive Work , 2004 .

[2]  Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa,et al.  Is Anybody Out There? Antecedents of Trust in Global Virtual Teams , 1998, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[3]  R. Kanter.  The Change Masters , 1983 .

[4]  Neil B. Harrison,et al.  Patterns of productive software organizations , 1996, Bell Labs Tech. J..

[5]  D. Wilemon,et al.  Working Together Apart? Building a Knowledge-sharing Culture for Global Virtual Teams , 2004 .

[6]  Gregory B. Northcraft,et al.  Three Social Dilemmas of Workforce Diversity in Organizations: A Social Identity Perspective , 1999 .

[7]  A. Zaheer,et al.  Does Trust Matter? Exploring the Effectsof Interorganizational and Interpersonaltrust on Performance , 1998 .

[8]  J. Swan,et al.  Trust and inter-organizational networking , 2000 .

[9]  Fiona E. Murray.  Innovation as co-evolution of scientific and technological networks: exploring tissue engineering , 2002 .

[10]  Daniel J. McAllister.  Affect- and Cognition-Based Trust as Foundations for Interpersonal Cooperation in Organizations , 1995 .

[11]  E. Teram.  A Case Against Making the Control of Clients a Negotiable Contingency for Interdisciplinary Teams , 1999 .

[12]  Donald M. Taylor,et al.  Ethnocentrism and Causal Attribution in a South Indian Context , 1974 .

[13]  Rob Cross,et al.  A Relational View of Information Seeking and Learning in Social Networks , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[14]  Sumantra Ghoshal,et al.  Organizing for Worldwide Effectiveness: The Transnational Solution , 1988 .

[15]  J. Orr.  Talking about Machines: An Ethnography of a Modern Job , 1998 .

[16]  P. Earley,et al.  Trust, Perceived Importance of Praise and Criticism, and Work Performance: An Examination of Feedback in the United States and England , 1986 .

[17]  James D. Thompson.  Organizations in Action , 1967 .

[18]  Richard A. Guzzo,et al.  Group performance and intergroup relations in organizations. , 1992 .

[19]  Morten T. Hansen,et al.  The Search-Transfer Problem: The Role of Weak Ties in Sharing Knowledge across Organization Subunits , 1999 .

[20]  Laurie L. Levesque,et al.  Social networks and the psychological contract: Structural holes, cohesive ties, and beliefs regarding employer obligations , 2006 .

[21]  Jon Hindmarsh,et al.  Workplace Studies: List of contributors , 2000 .

[22]  W. Whyte,et al.  Participatory Action Research , 1989 .

[23]  Pamela J. Hinds,et al.  Workplace Studies: Recovering Work Practice and Informing System Design, Paul Luff, Jon Hindmarsh and Christian C. Heath (eds.) , 2000, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[24]  Gary C. David,et al.  Accountably Other: Trust, Reciprocity and Exclusion in a Context of Situated Practice , 2005 .

[25]  Carrie R. Leana,et al.  Organizational Social Capital and Employment Practices , 1999 .

[26]  H. Garfinkel.  Studies in Ethnomethodology , 1968 .

[27]  H. Tsoukas.  The firm as a distributed knowledge system : A constructionist approach , 1996 .

[28]  W. Goldschmidt,et al.  GENERAL AND THEORETICAL: The Gift: Forms and Functions of Exchange in Archaic Societies. Marcel Mauss. Translated by Ian Cunnison. Introduction by E. E. Evans-Pritchard , 1955 .

[29]  Kirsimarja Blomqvist,et al.  Managing distance in a global virtual team: the evolution of trust through technology‐mediated relational communication , 2005 .

[30]  Sue Newell,et al.  The Myth of the Boundaryless Organization , 2001, CACM.

[31]  Roderick M. Kramer,et al.  Swift trust and temporary groups. , 1996 .

[32]  D. Wellman,et al.  Talking About Machines: An Ethnography of a Modern Job. , 1997 .

[33]  S. Chowdhury,et al.  The role of affect- and cognition-based trust in complex knowledge sharing. , 2005 .

[34]  A. Gouldner.  THE NORM OF RECIPROCITY: A PRELIMINARY STATEMENT * , 1960 .

[35]  B. Ann Bettencourt,et al.  Cooperation and the reduction of intergroup bias: The role of reward structure and social orientation ☆ , 1992 .

[36]  Thomas F. Pettigrew,et al.  The Ultimate Attribution Error: Extending Allport's Cognitive Analysis of Prejudice , 1979 .

[37]  P. Adler,et al.  Social Capital: Prospects for a New Concept , 2002 .

[38]  Gina J. Medsker,et al.  RELATIONS BETWEEN WORK GROUP CHARACTERISTICS AND EFFECTIVENESS: IMPLICATIONS FOR DESIGNING EFFECTIVE WORK GROUPS , 1993 .

[39]  John D. Politis.  The connection between trust and knowledge management: what are its implications for team performance , 2003, J. Knowl. Manag..

[40]  C. Bartlett,et al.  What is a global manager? , 1992, Harvard business review.

[41]  Jon Hindmarsh,et al.  Workplace Studies: Exploring the workplace , 2000 .