Consumers’ preferences for geographical origin labels: evidence from the Canadian olive oil market

Geographical origin labels are important information and marketing tools and have recently become a central component of EU agricultural promotion. We consider demand in a non-EU export market for two distinct label types: country of origin (COO) and geographical indications (GIs). Additionally, two types of GIs, 'protected designations of origin' (PDOs) and 'protected GIs' (PGIs) are considered. Empirical findings indicate consumers' willingness to pay varies with the oil's COO and is greater for GIs than for non-GIs from a given country. Weaker evidence that consumers value PDOs more than PGIs is also found. Oxford University Press and Foundation for the European Review of Agricultural Economics 2011; all rights reserved. For permissions, please email journals.permissions@oup.com, Oxford University Press.

[1]  F. Gilmore.  A country — can it be repositioned? Spain — the success story of country branding , 2002 .

[2]  R. B. Clemens,et al.  Country of Origin as a Brand: The Case of New Zealand Lamb , 2004 .

[3]  M. Loureiro,et al.  Estimating Consumer Willingness to Pay for Country-of-Origin Labeling , 2003 .

[4]  R. G. Cummings,et al.  Unbiased Value Estimates for Environmental Goods: A Cheap Talk Design for the Contingent Valuation Method , 1999 .

[5]  W. Adamowicz,et al.  Labelling Genetically Modified Food: Heterogeneous Consumer Preferences and the Value of Information , 2005 .

[6]  Jordan J. Louviere,et al.  Perceptions versus Objective Measures of Environmental Quality in Combined Revealed and Stated Preference Models of Environmental Valuation , 1997 .

[7]  Athanasios Krystallis,et al.  Consumer Preferences for Quality Foods from a South European Perspective: A Conjoint Analysis Implementation on Greek Olive Oil , 2005 .

[8]  Precaution and Protectionism: GM Food and the WTO , 2005 .

[9]  W. Adamowicz,et al.  Consumers' Food Choices with Voluntary Access to Genetic Modification Information , 2006 .

[10]  B. Türkekul,et al.  A Market Share Analysis of Virgin Olive Oil Producer Countries with special respect to Competitiveness , 2007 .

[11]  D. Hayes,et al.  Collective Marketing Arrangements for Geographically Differentiated Agricultural Products: Welfare Impacts and Policy Implications , 2007 .

[12]  E. Barham,et al.  Translating terroir: the global challenge of French AOC labeling , 2003 .

[13]  Carl Johan Lagerkvist,et al.  Using cheap talk as a test of validity in choice experiments , 2005 .

[14]  F. Norwood,et al.  How Closely Do Hypothetical Surveys and Laboratory Experiments Predict Field Behavior? , 2009 .

[15]  J. F. Santos,et al.  PRODUCT ATTRIBUTE SALIENCY AND REGION OF ORIGIN: SOME EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE FROM PORTUGAL , 2005 .

[16]  Frode Alfnes,et al.  Consumers' Willingness to Pay for the Color of Salmon: A Choice Experiment with Real Economic Incentives , 2006 .

[17]  A. Zwane,et al.  Can Country‐of‐Origin Labeling Succeed as a Marketing Tool for Produce? Lessons from Three Case Studies , 2006 .

[18]  Marshall W. Van Alstyne,et al.  An Economic Response to Unsolicited Communication , 2005 .

[19]  ESTIMATING CONSUMER WILLINGNESS-TO-PAY FOR COUNTRY OF-ORIGIN-LABELS FOR BEEF PRODUCTS , 2002 .

[20]  GianCarlo Moschini,et al.  Geographical Indications and the Competitive Provision of Quality in Agricultural Markets , 2008 .

[21]  P. Nelson.  Advertising as Information , 1974, Journal of Political Economy.

[22]  V. Réquillart.  On the Economics of Geographical Indications in the EU , 2007 .

[23]  Ramona Teuber,et al.  Geographical Indications of Origin as a Tool of Product Differentiation: The Case of Coffee , 2010 .

[24]  South Korean Hotel Meat Buyers' Perceptions of Australian, Canadian and U.S. Beef , 1998 .

[25]  Riccardo Scarpa,et al.  Journal of Agricultural & Food Industrial Organization Market Segmentation via Mixed Logit : Extra-Virgin Olive Oil in Urban Italy , 2011 .

[26]  P. Green,et al.  Conjoint Analysis in Consumer Research: Issues and Outlook , 1978 .

[27]  John A. List,et al.  Using Choice Experiments to Value Non-Market Goods and Services: Evidence from Field Experiments , 2006 .

[28]  F. Norwood,et al.  Bridging the gap between laboratory experiments and naturally occurring markets: An inferred valuation method , 2009 .

[29]  George A. Akerlof.  The Market for “Lemons”: Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism , 1970 .

[30]  Jason P. Brown,et al.  Consumer Behavior, Public Policy, and Country-of-Origin Labeling , 2006 .

[31]  Thomas A. Burnham,et al.  CONSUMER RESPONSE TO GENETICALLY MODIFIED FOODS: MARKET SEGMENT ANALYSIS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR PRODUCERS AND POLICY MAKERS , 2001 .

[32]  K. Rickertsen,et al.  European Consumers' Willingness to Pay for U.S. Beef in Experimental Auction Markets , 2003 .

[33]  W. Xiaobing,et al.  Protection of Geographical Indications in China: Conflicts, Causes and Solutions , 2007 .

[34]  Gregory L. Poe,et al.  Alternative Non-market Value-Elicitation Methods: Are the Underlying Preferences the Same? , 2002 .

[35]  Koert van Ittersum,et al.  The Role of the Region of Origin and EU Certificates of Origin in Consumer Evaluation of Food Products , 2001 .

[36]  Siriginidi Subba Rao.  Indigenous knowledge organization: An Indian scenario , 2006, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[37]  P. Nelson.  Information and Consumer Behavior , 1970, Journal of Political Economy.

[38]  Peter Martinsson,et al.  Do Hypothetical and Actual Marginal Willingness to Pay Differ in Choice Experiments?: Application to the Valuation of the Environment , 2001 .

[39]  Mark V. Pezzo,et al.  The Psychology of Windfall Gains , 1994 .

[40]  Chanjin Chung,et al.  Valuing Quality Attributes and Country of Origin in the Korean Beef Market , 2009 .

[41]  Gale E. West,et al.  Consumer Confusion Over the Significance of Meat Attributes: The Case of Veal , 2002 .

[42]  A. Macpherson,et al.  The impact of geographical indication on the revitalisation of a regional economy: a case study of ‘Boseong’ green tea , 2007 .

[43]  David A. Hensher,et al.  Hypothetical bias, choice experiments and willingness to pay , 2010 .

[44]  Céline Bonnet,et al.  Assessing consumer response to Protected Designation of Origin labelling: a mixed multinomial logit approach , 2001 .

[45]  COOL and Consumers' Willingness to Pay in the Fresh Produce Industry - Some Initial Impressions from the Field , 2004 .

[46]  T. Josling.  The War on Terroir: Geographical Indications as a Transatlantic Trade Conflict , 2006 .

[47]  O. Johansson-Stenman,et al.  Measuring Hypothetical Bias in Choice Experiments: The Importance of Cognitive Consistency , 2008 .

[48]  M. Marchant,et al.  Chinese Consumers' Preferences for Livestock Products , 2003 .

[49]  J. Reimer,et al.  Market Conduct in the U.S. Ready-to-Eat Cereal Industry , 2004 .

[50]  T. Schroeder,et al.  Are Choice Experiments Incentive Compatible? A Test with Quality Differentiated Beef Steaks , 2004 .

[51]  T. Schroeder,et al.  European preferences for beef steak attributes , 2005 .