Beyond Flexner: A New Model for Continuous Learning in the Health Professions

One hundred years after Flexner wrote his report for the Carnegie Foundation, calls are heard for another “Flexnerian revolution,” a reform movement that would overhaul an approach to medical education that is criticized for its expense and inefficiency, its failure to respond to the health needs of our communities, and the high cost and inefficiency of the health care system it supports. To address these concerns, a group of Vanderbilt educators, national experts, administrators, residents, and students attended a retreat in November 2008. The goal of this meeting was to craft a new vision of physician learning based on the continuous development and assessment of competencies needed for effective and compassionate care under challenging circumstances. The vision that emerged from this gathering was that of a health care workforce comprised of physicians and other professionals, all capable of assessing practice outcomes, identifying learning needs, and engaging in continuous learning to achieve the best care for their patients. Several principles form the foundation for this vision. Learning should be competency based and embedded in the workplace. It should be linked to patient needs and undertaken by individual providers, by teams, and by institutions. Health professionals should be trained in this new model from the start of the educational experience, leading to true interprofessional education, with shared facilities and the same basic coursework. Multiple entry and exit points would provide flexibility and would allow health professionals to redirect their careers as their goals evolved. This article provides a detailed account of the model developed at the retreat and the obstacles that might be encountered in attempting to implement it.

[1]  T. Dornan,et al.  Experience‐based learning: a model linking the processes and outcomes of medical students' workplace learning , 2007, Medical education.

[2]  P. Plsek,et al.  The challenge of complexity in health care , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[3]  Victoria J. Marsick,et al.  Learning in the Workplace: The Case for Reflectivity and Critical Reflectivity , 1988 .

[4]  Donald E Moore,et al.  Practice-based learning and improvement. , 2003, The Journal of continuing education in the health professions.

[5]  Kevin W Eva,et al.  How Can I Know What I Don't Know? Poor Self Assessment in a Well-Defined Domain , 2004, Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice.

[6]  Clayton M. Christensen,et al.  Disruptive innovation in health care delivery: a framework for business-model innovation. , 2008, Health affairs.

[7]  Sarah W. Fraser,et al.  Coping with complexity: educating for capability , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[8]  William J. Geis Dental Education in the United States and Canada : A Report to the Carnegie Foundation For the Advancement of Teaching , 1926 .

[9]  Kevin W Eva,et al.  Self-Assessment in the Health Professions: A Reformulation and Research Agenda , 2005, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[10]  J. Deis,et al.  Transforming the Morbidity and Mortality Conference into an Instrument for Systemwide Improvement , 2008 .

[11]  M T Rabkin,et al.  Will disruptive innovations cure health care? , 2001, Harvard business review.

[12]  K. Mann,et al.  Reflection and reflective practice in health professions education: a systematic review , 2009, Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice.

[13]  P. Margolis,et al.  Practice based education to improve delivery systems for prevention in primary care: randomised trial , 2004, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[14]  Pamela R. Matthews,et al.  Workplace learning: developing an holistic model , 1999 .

[15]  V. Arora,et al.  Teaching Internal Medicine Residents Quality Improvement Techniques using the ABIM’s Practice Improvement Modules , 2008, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[16]  Michael Fordis,et al.  Accuracy of physician self-assessment compared with observed measures of competence: a systematic review. , 2006, JAMA.