Environmental economics and ecological economics: the contribution of interdisciplinarity to understanding, influence and effectiveness

SUMMARY This paper reviews developments in both environmental economics and ecological economics with respect to their progress towards environmental interdisciplinarity and towards providing solutions to environmental problems. The concepts, methods, theories and assumptions of each field of knowledge are reviewed and the extent to which they depart from the dominant neoclassical paradigm of economics is assessed. The contribution that interdisciplinarity has made to the success of each field is analysed in terms of understanding, influence and effectiveness and the constraints that it has imposed upon that success. Environmental economics has adopted the dominant economic neoclassical paradigm, including the power of the market to allocate environmental resources efficiently and in a socially optimal way. The solution to environmental problems is thus seen as a matter of ensuring that the environment is properly priced to reflect the relative scarcity of natural resources and assets and to ensure that environmental values are incorporated into the market. This specialized view of environmental problems is now reflected in government policy around the world including the use of extended cost benefit analyses, contingent valuations, environmental charges and emissions trading. Nevertheless, environmental problems continue to grow in severity and the solutions provided by environmental economists have proven ineffective. Thus lack of interdisciplinarity does not prevent a field of knowledge from gaining influence and dominance, however its effectiveness in terms of understanding environmental problems and solving them is impeded. Ecological economics seeks to incorporate the research of economists, ecologists, philosophers and social scientists, however its influence seems to be have been limited to areas in which it retains the standard economics framework, and this limits its effectiveness in terms of environmental solutions. Thus interdisciplinarity may increase understanding of the real world but it cannot overcome political and social barriers to translating that understanding into the widespread implementation of effective environmental measures.

[1]  Dirk J. Roux,et al.  Can ecosystem services lead ecology on a transdisciplinary pathway? , 2010, Environmental Conservation.

[2]  D. Pearce.  An Intellectual History of Environmental Economics , 2002 .

[3]  C Levenstein,et al.  Environmental Economics , 2019 .

[4]  R. Westrum.  The Social Construction of Technological Systems , 1989 .

[5]  Sharon Beder,et al.  Charging the earth: The promotion of price-based measures for pollution control , 1996 .

[6]  R. O'Neill,et al.  The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital , 1997, Nature.

[7]  E. Barbier,et al.  Blueprint for a green economy , 1989 .

[8]  William J. Baumol,et al.  The theory of environmental policy: Contents , 1988 .

[9]  R. Goodin.  Selling Environmental Indulgences , 1994 .

[10]  T. Power.  For the Common Good: Redirecting the Economy toward Community, the Environment, and a Sustainable Future , 1993 .

[11]  R. D. Groot,et al.  The history of ecosystem services in economic theory and practice: From early notions to markets and payment schemes , 2010 .

[12]  Incentives for environmental protection , 1984 .

[13]  J. Cameron,et al.  Interpreting the Precautionary Principle , 2013 .

[14]  I. Røpke.  The early history of modern ecological economics , 2004 .

[15]  K. Shrader-Frechette.  Environmental Justice: Creating Equality, Reclaiming Democracy , 2002 .

[16]  C. Spash.  The Development of Environmental Thinking in Economics , 1999, Environmental Values.

[17]  David Pearce,et al.  Blueprint 2: Greening the World Economy , 1991 .

[18]  E. Corbera,et al.  Payments for ecosystem services as commodity fetishism , 2010 .

[19]  P. Portney.  The theory of environmental policy , 1976 .

[20]  Ghislaine M. Lawrence.  The social construction of technological systems: new directions in the sociology and history of technology , 1989, Medical History.

[21]  Stuart W G Derbyshire,et al.  Priceless: On Knowing the Price of Everything and the Value of Nothing , 2005, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[22]  W. Rees.  Revisiting carrying capacity: Area-based indicators of sustainability , 1996 .

[23]  D. Ehrenfeld.  Why Put a Value on Biodiversity , 1988 .

[24]  W. Baumol,et al.  The theory of environmental policy: On the theory of externalities , 1988 .

[25]  W. Block,et al.  Economics and the environment : a reconciliation , 1991 .

[26]  Paul Upham,et al.  The international challenge of climate change: UK leadership in the G8 and EU , 2004 .

[27]  Marilyn Waring,et al.  Counting For Nothing - What Men Value and What Women Are Worth , 1989 .

[28]  Sharon Beder.  Environmental Principles and Policies , 2006 .

[29]  Inge Røpke,et al.  Trends in the development of ecological economics from the late 1980s to the early 2000s , 2005 .

[30]  Peter Nijkamp,et al.  Economic valuation of biodiversity: A comparative study , 2008 .

[31]  C. Spash.  Economics, Ethics, and Long-Term Environmental Damages , 1993 .

[32]  R. Stavins.  Harnessing Market Forces to Protect the Environment , 1989 .

[33]  James Joyce,et al.  Perspectives on technology , 1977, Medical History.

[34]  R. Solow,et al.  Intergenerational Equity and Exhaustable Resources , 1973 .

[35]  G. Daily.  Nature's services: societal dependence on natural ecosystems. , 1998 .

[36]  Stefan Baumgärtner,et al.  Relating the Philosophy and Practice of Ecological Economics: The Role of Concepts, Models, and Case Studies in Inter- and Transdisciplinary Sustainability Research , 2008 .

[37]  D. Driesen.  Free Lunch or Cheap Fix?: The Emissions Trading Idea and the Climate Change Convention , 1998 .

[38]  G. Hardin,et al.  The Tragedy of the Commons , 1968, Green Planet Blues.

[39]  J. S. Kuhn,et al.  Pollution Trading and Environmental Injustice: Los Angeles’ Failed Experiment in Air Quality Policy , 1999 .

[40]  Using economic incentives to maintain our environment. , 1990 .

[41]  R. Norgaard.  Ecosystem services: From eye-opening metaphor to complexity blinder , 2010 .

[42]  Donald MacKenzie,et al.  The social shaping of technology : how the refrigerator got its hum , 1985 .

[43]  S. Ryan,et al.  A review of economic instruments for environmental management in Queensland , 2002 .

[44]  Frank Wätzold,et al.  Payments for ecosystem services , 2012 .

[45]  Robin R. Jenkins,et al.  Green Fees: How a Tax Shift Can Work for the Environment and the Economy , 1992 .

[46]  Business-managed democracy: The trade agenda , 2010 .

[47]  M. Moran,et al.  The market and the state : studies in interdependence , 1991 .

[48]  Manfred A. Max-Neef.  Foundations of transdisciplinarity , 2005 .

[49]  Gordon L. Hester,et al.  Electric & Magnetic: Fields Managing an Uncertain Risk , 1992 .