How exposure to logos and logo varieties fosters brand prominence and freshness

Purpose This study aims to propose that a brand can be kept both prominent and fresh by using existing logos as well as logo varieties (i.e. slight modifications to the brand’s existing logo). Design/methodology/approach In two experimental studies, the authors exposed respondents to either the existing brand logo or to logo varieties, and examined their influence on brand prominence and freshness. Findings The findings suggest that consumers subconsciously process logo varieties to which they are exposed in a similar way as they subconsciously process the existing logo of the brand, making both types of logo exposure effective for building brand prominence and freshness. Research limitations/implications It would also be worthwhile to study the effect of logo varieties using other dependent measures than the ones employed in this study, such as purchase intent and behavioral measures (such as consumption behaviors). Practical implications This research shows that logo varieties can be used alongside the existing brand logo to build prominence and freshness. These findings diverge from the findings typically reported in the branding literature that state that consumers resist changes to logos. Originality/value This research not only demonstrates that exposure to logo varieties and existing logos evokes automatic effects (both types of logos outperform a control group in fostering brand-related outcomes) but also confirms that exposing consumers to the existing logo or logo varieties give less differential effects than one may think.

[1]  J. Steenkamp,et al.  Emotions in consumer behavior: A hierarchical approach , 2005 .

[2]  Matthew M. Gervais,et al.  THE EVOLUTION AND FUNCTIONS OF LAUGHTER AND HUMOR: A SYNTHETIC APPROACH , 2005, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[3]  Steven C Martino,et al.  Branding Behavior: The Strategy behind the TruthSM Campaign , 2002 .

[4]  W. Stroebe,et al.  Beyond Vicary's fantasies: The impact of subliminal priming and brand choice , 2006 .

[5]  Marsha L. Richins.  Measuring Emotions in the Consumption Experience , 1997 .

[6]  L. Chernatony.  Brand Management Through Narrowing the Gap Between Brand Identity and Brand Reputation , 1999 .

[7]  R. Eisenberger,et al.  Affective commitment to the organization: the contribution of perceived organizational support. , 2001, The Journal of applied psychology.

[8]  Herbert Jack Rotfeld,et al.  Understanding advertising clutter and the real solution to declining audience attention to mass media commercial messages , 2006 .

[9]  Frank R. Kardes,et al.  An Investigation of the Mediational Mechanisms Underlying Attitudinal Conditioning , 1996 .

[10]  Heiner Evanschitzky,et al.  The relative strength of affective commitment in securing loyalty in service relationships , 2006 .

[11]  Niki Hynes,et al.  Colour and meaning in corporate logos: An empirical study , 2009 .

[12]  Joana César Machado,et al.  Brand mergers: examining consumers' responses to name and logo design , 2012 .

[13]  N. Neave,et al.  Evolutionary factors in design preferences , 2007 .

[14]  Vijay Mahajan,et al.  Strategic Role of Affect-Based Attitudes in the Acquisition, Development, and Retention of Customers , 1998 .

[15]  Ian R. Gellatly,et al.  Affective and continuance commitment to the organization: Evaluation of measures and analysis of concurrent and time-lagged relations. , 1990 .

[16]  H. Reis,et al.  The Mind in the Middle , 2013 .

[17]  Joseph A. Cote,et al.  Impression Management using Typeface Design , 2004 .

[18]  W. Meyer,et al.  Toward a Process Analysis of Emotions: The Case of Surprise , 1997 .

[19]  Henrik Hagtvedt,et al.  The Impact of Incomplete Typeface Logos on Perceptions of the Firm , 2011 .

[20]  J. Russell.  A circumplex model of affect. , 1980 .

[21]  R. Plutchik.  A GENERAL PSYCHOEVOLUTIONARY THEORY OF EMOTION , 1980 .

[22]  Ullrich K. H. Ecker,et al.  The hidden persuaders break into the tired brain , 2009 .

[23]  Luca Cian,et al.  This Logo Moves Me: Dynamic Imagery from Static Images , 2014 .

[24]  Andreas B. Eisingerich,et al.  The role of brand logos in firm performance , 2013 .

[25]  Michel Wedel,et al.  Breaking Through the Clutter: Benefits of Advertisement Originality and Familiarity for Brand Attention and Memory , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[26]  Michael F. Walsh,et al.  How Re-Designing Angular Logos to Be Rounded Shapes Brand Attitude: Consumer Brand Commitment and Self-Construal , 2011 .

[27]  Joseph A. Cote,et al.  Guidelines for Selecting or Modifying Logos , 1998 .

[28]  E. Faison.  The Neglected Variety Drive: A Useful Concept for Consumer Behavior , 1977 .

[29]  Robert Plutchik,et al.  A psychoevolutionary theory of emotions , 1982 .

[30]  Henk Aarts,et al.  The power of the subliminal: On subliminal persuasion and other potential applications , 2005 .

[31]  D. Berlyne.  Conflict, arousal, and curiosity , 2014 .

[32]  Bruno Kocher,et al.  The effects of visual rejuvenation through brand logos , 2013 .

[33]  Rodolfo Vázquez,et al.  Consumer-based Brand Equity: Development and Validation of a Measurement Instrument , 2002 .

[34]  Gráinne M. Fitzsimons,et al.  Automatic Effects of Brand Exposure on Motivated Behavior: How Apple Makes You "Think Different" , 2008 .

[35]  Bernd H. Schmitt,et al.  Building Strong Brands in Asia: Selecting the Visual Components of Image to Maximize Brand Strength , 2003 .

[36]  Michael T. Ewing,et al.  Aesthetic theory and logo design: examining consumer response to proportion across cultures , 2007 .

[37]  Vikas Mittal,et al.  Do logo redesigns help or hurt your brand? The role of brand commitment , 2010 .

[38]  Kenneth R. Lord,et al.  Product Placement in Movies: The Effect of Prominence and Mode on Audience Recall , 1998 .