Estimating biomass stocks and potential loss of biomass carbon through clear-felling of rubber plantations

Abstract When latex production declines after 35–40 y, clear-felling of rubber ( Hevea brasiliensis ) plantations is a common management practice around the world. Although clear-felling can lead to significant losses in system carbon (C), such losses have not been adequately quantified in rubber plantations in India. The objectives of this work are to (1) develop and test models for estimating rubber tree biomass and C storage in situations where diameter at breast height (D 1.3 m) cannot be measured precisely due to the tapping artefact, and (2) estimate losses in biomass C due to clear-felling of mature plantation. Five biomass estimation models were tested using a total of 54 trees destructively sampled from 35 to 40 y old plantations in North East India. Then the amount of biomass and the potential C losses following clear-felling were estimated. The tree biomass predicted by our models was within 0.2 and 5% of our measured tree biomass. The mean biomass was estimated at 376.9 and 23.9 kg per tree for above and below ground parts, respectively. On an area basis, total tree biomass was estimated at 286.1 Mg ha −1 , which was more than that under jungle rubber (147 Mg ha −1 ) but lower than the forests (384 Mg ha −1 ) in the tropical regions. According to our estimate clear-felling of mature plantation can on an average remove C at a rate of 135 Mg ha −1 , which represents most of the C stored in aboveground tree biomass. In order to conserve the biomass C and to maintain environmental integrity, we recommend selective felling of 20% of total growing stock starting from plantation age of 35 years and replanting at two year cycle.

[1]  Anònim Anònim.  Keys to Soil Taxonomy , 2010 .

[2]  H. J. Andrade,et al.  POTENTIAL OF CARBON STORAGE OF RUBBER (Hevea brasiliensis MÜLL. ARG.) PLANTATIONS IN MONOCULTURE AND AGROFORESTRY SYSTEMS IN THE COLOMBIAN AMAZON , 2014 .

[3]  Jianchu Xu,et al.  Soil Carbon Stocks Decrease following Conversion of Secondary Forests to Rubber (Hevea brasiliensis) Plantations , 2013, PloS one.

[4]  X. Lü,et al.  Carbon Stocks across a Fifty Year Chronosequence of Rubber Plantations in Tropical China , 2017 .

[5]  A. J. Friedland,et al.  Evidence for Losses From Strongly Bound SOM Pools After Clear Cutting in a Northern Hardwood Forest , 2016 .

[6]  Karl J Niklas,et al.  Global Allocation Rules for Patterns of Biomass Partitioning in Seed Plants , 2002, Science.

[7]  B. Nelson,et al.  Improved allometric models to estimate the aboveground biomass of tropical trees , 2014, Global change biology.

[8]  Jane Qiu,et al.  Where the rubber meets the garden , 2009, Nature.

[9]  Yiping Zhang,et al.  Do the rubber plantations in tropical China act as large carbon sinks , 2014 .

[10]  B. Fonge,et al.  Simulation of the impacts of three management regimes on carbon sinks in rubber and oil palm plantation ecosystems of South-Western Cameroon. , 2012 .

[11]  G. Sileshi.  A critical review of forest biomass estimation models, common mistakes and corrective measures , 2014 .

[12]  E. Luedeling,et al.  Carbon sequestration potential of agroforestry in Africa , 2011 .

[13]  P. Viswanathan.  Emerging Smallholder Rubber Farming Systems in India and Thailand: A Comparative Economic Analysis , 2008, Asian Journal of Agriculture and Development.

[14]  Jianchu Xu,et al.  The Rubber Juggernaut , 2009, Science.

[15]  Guirui Yu,et al.  Rubber plantations act as water pumps in tropical China , 2011 .

[16]  Jefferson Fox,et al.  Current trends of rubber plantation expansion may threaten biodiversity and livelihoods , 2015 .

[17]  R. Pachauri.  Climate change 2007. Synthesis report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the fourth assessment report , 2008 .

[18]  Jill Thompson,et al.  The H for DBH. , 2000 .

[19]  J. Chambers,et al.  Tree allometry and improved estimation of carbon stocks and balance in tropical forests , 2005, Oecologia.

[20]  Georg Cadisch,et al.  Carbon balance of rubber (Hevea brasiliensis) plantations: A review of uncertainties at plot, landscape and production level , 2016 .

[21]  O. Phillips,et al.  The importance of crown dimensions to improve tropical tree biomass estimates. , 2014, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[22]  P. D. Pathirana,et al.  The growth and yield of rubber at maturity is improved by intercropping with banana during the early stage of rubber cultivation , 2005 .

[23]  W. Shen,et al.  Near Isometric Biomass Partitioning in Forest Ecosystems of China , 2014, PloS one.

[24]  G. Egnell,et al.  Survival, growth, and growth allocation of planted Scots pine trees after different levels of biomass removal in clear-felling , 2003 .

[25]  Wei Zhao,et al.  Managing Carbon Sinks in Rubber (Hevea brasilensis) Plantation by Changing Rotation length in SW China , 2014, PloS one.

[26]  O. Mertz,et al.  The carbon sequestration potential of tree crop plantations , 2013, Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change.

[27]  G. Egnell,et al.  SURVIVAL AND GROWTH OF PLANTED SEEDLINGS OF PINUS SYLVESTRIS AND PICEA ABIES AFTER DIFFERENT LEVELS OF BIOMASS REMOVAL IN CLEAR-FELLING , 1999 .

[28]  David Edwards,et al.  Increasing Demand for Natural Rubber Necessitates a Robust Sustainability Initiative to Mitigate Impacts on Tropical Biodiversity , 2015 .

[29]  Grace B. Villamor,et al.  Biodiversity in rubber agroforests, carbon emissions, and rural livelihoods: An agent-based model of land-use dynamics in lowland Sumatra , 2014, Environ. Model. Softw..

[30]  Alain Albrecht,et al.  Carbon sequestration in tropical agroforestry systems , 2003 .

[31]  K. Gyokusen,et al.  Carbon sequestration, tree biomass growth and rubber yield of PB260 clone of rubber tree (hevea brasiliensis) in north Sumatra , 2014 .

[32]  A. Nath,et al.  Managing Rubber Plantations for Advancing Climate Change Mitigation Strategy , 2016 .

[33]  N. Reid,et al.  Statistical inference by confidence intervals: issues of interpretation and utilization. , 1999, Physical therapy.

[34]  Christoph Leuschner,et al.  Quantifying above‐ and belowground biomass carbon loss with forest conversion in tropical lowlands of Sumatra (Indonesia) , 2015, Global change biology.

[35]  Decheng Zhou,et al.  Forest cutting and impacts on carbon in the eastern United States , 2013, Scientific Reports.

[36]  K. Niklas,et al.  Above- and below-ground biomass relationships across 1534 forested communities. , 2007, Annals of botany.

[37]  Onofre S. Corpuz,et al.  Potential Carbon Storage of Rubber Plantations , 2014 .

[38]  J. Boone Kauffman,et al.  Allometric Models for Predicting Aboveground Biomass in Two Widespread Woody Plants in Hawaii , 2008 .

[39]  H. Neufeldt,et al.  Allometric equations for estimating biomass in agricultural landscapes: I. Aboveground biomass , 2012 .

[40]  Y. Kuzyakov,et al.  Losses of soil carbon by converting tropical forest to plantations: erosion and decomposition estimated by δ13C , 2015, Global change biology.