Robustness and complexity co-constructed in multimodal signalling networks

In animal communication, signals are frequently emitted using different channels (e.g. frequencies in a vocalization) and different modalities (e.g. gestures can accompany vocalizations). We explore two explanations that have been provided for multimodality: (i) selection for high information transfer through dedicated channels and (ii) increasing fault tolerance or robustness through multichannel signals. Robustness relates to an accurate decoding of a signal when parts of a signal are occluded. We show analytically in simple feed-forward neural networks that while a multichannel signal can solve the robustness problem, a multimodal signal does so more effectively because it can maximize the contribution made by each channel while minimizing the effects of exclusion. Multimodality refers to sets of channels where within each set information is highly correlated. We show that the robustness property ensures correlations among channels producing complex, associative networks as a by-product. We refer to this as the principle of robust overdesign. We discuss the biological implications of this for the evolution of combinatorial signalling systems; in particular, how robustness promotes enough redundancy to allow for a subsequent specialization of redundant components into novel signals.

[1]  Rufus A. Johnstone,et al.  Multiple Displays in Animal Communication:`Backup Signals' and `Multiple Messages' , 1996 .

[2]  A. Pusey Chimpanzee Politics: Power and Sex among Apes, France de Waal. Harper & Row, New York (1982), 223, Price $16.50 , 1984 .

[3]  J. von Neumann,et al.  Probabilistic Logic and the Synthesis of Reliable Organisms from Unreliable Components , 1956 .

[4]  Kenneth Webb,et al.  Evolution of Communication Simulation of Adaptive Behavior – Project Report , 2004 .

[5]  G. Edelman,et al.  A measure for brain complexity: relating functional segregation and integration in the nervous system. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[6]  Nihat Ay,et al.  Geometric robustness theory and biological networks , 2006, Theory in Biosciences.

[7]  J. Flack,et al.  Context modulates signal meaning in primate communication , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[8]  Joshua B. Plotkin,et al.  Principles and Parameters of Molecular Robustness , 2003 .

[9]  W S McCulloch,et al.  A logical calculus of the ideas immanent in nervous activity , 1990, The Philosophy of Artificial Intelligence.

[10]  H. Grice Utterer's meaning and intentions , 1969 .

[11]  P. Marler,et al.  Communication Goes Multimodal , 1999, Science.

[12]  Thomas M. Cover,et al.  Elements of Information Theory , 2005 .

[13]  M. Hauser,et al.  Perception of harmonics in the combination long call of cottontop tamarins, Saguinus oedipus , 2002, Animal Behaviour.

[14]  M A Nowak,et al.  Evolutionary preservation of redundant duplicated genes. , 1999, Seminars in cell & developmental biology.

[15]  Damian O Elias,et al.  Seismic signals in a courting male jumping spider (Araneae: Salticidae) , 2003, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[16]  W. Strange Evolution of language. , 1984, JAMA.

[17]  James M. Hillis,et al.  Combining Sensory Information: Mandatory Fusion Within, but Not Between, Senses , 2002, Science.

[18]  C. Rowe Receiver psychology and the evolution of multicomponent signals , 1999, Animal Behaviour.

[19]  W. Pitts,et al.  A Logical Calculus of the Ideas Immanent in Nervous Activity (1943) , 2021, Ideas That Created the Future.