Gulati elections of 2006 and 2008 Social networks in political campaigns : Facebook and the congressional

This study examines the early adoption and dissemination of emerging technology tools in campaigns by analyzing which candidates were the most likely to adopt and use Facebook in the 2006 and 2008 elections to the US House of Representatives. The research hypotheses draw primarily from the diffusion of innovation literature. Our analysis of 802 candidates in 2006 and 816 candidates in 2008 indicates that Facebook adoption diffused rapidly between 2006 and 2008, with party (Democrats), competition, money and the level of education in the district explaining both adoption and implementation. Challengers and candidates for open seats were more likely to be early adopters, but incumbents used Facebook more extensively. Both higher adoption rates by peers or competitors in the candidate’s own state and a propensity to adopt earlier campaign technologies are strong positive motivators for early adoption, but irrelevant to usage.

[1]  Robert G. Fichman,et al.  International Conference on Information Systems ( ICIS ) 1992 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DIFFUSION : A REVIEW OF EMPIRICAL RESEARCH , 2017 .

[2]  John M. Carey,et al.  Incentives to cultivate a personal vote: A rank ordering of electoral formulas☆ , 1995 .

[3]  T. H. Kwon,et al.  Unifying the fragmented models of information systems implementation , 1987 .

[4]  Kirsten A. Foot,et al.  Politics As Usual, or Politics Unusual? Position Taking and Dialogue on Campaign Websites in the 2002 U.S. Elections , 2005 .

[5]  Wallace Koehler,et al.  Virtual inequality: Beyond the digital divide , 2004, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[6]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of innovations , 1964, Encyclopedia of Sport Management.

[7]  A. Chadwick,et al.  Parties, Election Campaigning and the Internet:Toward A Comparative Institutional Approach , 2008 .

[8]  Robert G. Fichman,et al.  Going Beyond the Dominant Paradigm for Information Technology Innovation Research: Emerging Concepts and Methods , 2004, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[9]  Rachel Gibson,et al.  European political organizations and the internet: Mobilization, participation, and change , 2008 .

[10]  J. Beatty,et al.  The Politics of Internet Communication , 2004 .

[11]  Lawrence B. Mohr,et al.  Determinants of Innovation in Organizations , 1969, American Political Science Review.

[12]  Aaron Smith and Lee Rainie.  The internet and the 2008 election , 2008 .

[13]  Jack L. Walker.  The Diffusion of Innovations among the American States , 1969, American Political Science Review.

[14]  S. Welch,et al.  The Impact of Federal Incentives on State Policy Innovation , 1980 .

[15]  N. Schillewaert,et al.  Organizational innovation adoption: a multi-level framework of determinants and opportunities for future research , 2002 .

[16]  Charles A. Johnson.  Political Culture in American States: Elazar's Formulation Examined , 1976 .

[17]  L. G. Tornatzky,et al.  Innovation characteristics and innovation adoption-implementation: A meta-analysis of findings , 1982, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[18]  Virginia Gray,et al.  Innovation in the States: A Diffusion Study , 1973, American Political Science Review.

[19]  Sylvia Manzano,et al.  Take One for the Team? Limits of Shared Ethnicity and Candidate Preferences , 2010 .

[20]  C. Williams,et al.  Closing the Gap, Raising the Bar , 2007 .

[21]  R. Gibson,et al.  Election Campaigning on the WWW in the USA and UK , 2003 .

[22]  James N. Druckman,et al.  Campaign Communications in U.S. Congressional Elections , 2009, American Political Science Review.

[23]  T. S. Robertson,et al.  Competitive Effects on Technology Diffusion , 1986 .

[24]  Stuart Hannabuss,et al.  Internet Politics: States, Citizens, and New Communication Technologies , 2007 .

[25]  M. Hindman,et al.  Campaign Politics and the Digital Divide , 2007 .

[26]  Kim Strandberg,et al.  Online campaigning: an opening for the outsiders? An analysis of Finnish parliamentary candidates' websites in the 2003 election campaign , 2009, New Media Soc..

[27]  J. Hage,et al.  Program Change and Organizational Properties a Comparative Analysis , 1967, American Journal of Sociology.

[28]  Lyn Ragsdale.  The Fiction of Congressional Elections as Presidential Events , 1980 .

[29]  M. Wattenberg.  The Rise of Candidate-Centered Politics: Presidential Elections of the 1980s , 1991 .

[30]  S. Schneider.  NEW MEDIA CAMPAIGNS AND THE MANAGED CITIZEN , 2007 .

[31]  Christine B. Williams,et al.  Congressional Candidates' Use of YouTube in 2008: Its Frequency and Rationale , 2010 .

[32]  J. Nye,et al.  Governance.com: Democracy in the Information Age , 2004 .