Client Needs and the Design Process in Web Projects

The nature of Web systems is substantially different from more conventional software systems. They are developed in shorter timeframes, often act as the direct interface between multiple stakeholders, meet a more generic set of requirements, and generally serve a less specific user group. They are often developed very quickly from templated solutions, using coarse-grained authoring tools, and by the efforts of a multidisciplinary team. There is often considerable uncertainty on the part of the client as to their own requirements. The importance of defining the objectives of the system during the early stages of a project are generally acknowledged to be important, but access to the tools and templates can encourage developers to build too early. Often requirements are inadequately documented, or only emerge during development, or change as development proceeds. The immaturity of the industry and the lack of standardised processes in web development have been demonstrated by web-based solutions that in many cases fail to meet fundamental requirements. Specifications for Web systems are consequently very different from those for more conventional software systems. Apart from an increased emphasis on user interactions and the underpinning content, they also reflect a blurring of the boundaries between requirements, specifications and designs in the development process. In this paper we offer an iterative model for Web systems development that incorporates the user of partial design prototypes as a crucial stage in resolving requirements. This is derived from an analysis of the results of a survey of commercial Web practice. In particular, we explore what this data tells us about the nature of Web specifications, particularly looking at what is typically specified and the stage at which certain characteristics emerge within the evolving specification. The results support the hypothesis that within commercial Web development, design artifacts become a crucial element in supporting client understanding and driving the formulation of requirements.

[1]  Scott P. Overmyer,et al.  What’s Different about Requirements Engineering for Web Sites? , 2000, Requirements Engineering.

[2]  Brian Henderson-Sellers,et al.  Adding Web support to OPEN , 2001 .

[3]  David B. Lowe A Framework for Defining Acceptance Criteria for Web Development Projects , 2001, Web Engineering.

[4]  Roger Fournier,et al.  A Methodology for Client/Server and Web Application Development , 1998 .

[5]  Jessica Burdman,et al.  Collaborative Web Development: Strategies and Best Practices for Web Teams , 1999 .

[6]  Elaine England,et al.  Managing Multimedia; Project Management for Interactive Media with CD-ROM , 1999 .

[7]  Elaine England,et al.  Managing Multimedia , 1996 .

[8]  Ian Sommerville,et al.  Requirements Engineering: Processes and Techniques , 1998 .

[9]  Db Lowe,et al.  Commercial issues in specification of Web systems , 2001 .

[10]  Kent L. Beck,et al.  Extreme programming explained - embrace change , 1990 .

[11]  Patricia Vilain,et al.  A Diagrammatic Tool for Representing User Interaction in UML , 2000, UML.

[12]  Elaine England,et al.  Managing Multimedia: Project Management for Interactive Media , 1998 .

[13]  Gustavo Rossi,et al.  The object-oriented hypermedia design model , 1995, CACM.

[14]  Nora Koch,et al.  Towards a UML Extension for Hypermedia Design , 1999, UML.

[15]  Jim Conallen,et al.  Building Web applications with UML , 1999 .

[16]  K. Beck,et al.  Extreme Programming Explained , 2002 .

[17]  Brian Henderson-Sellers,et al.  Web Development : Addressing Process Differences , 2001 .

[18]  Donald J. Reifer,et al.  Web Development: Estimating Quick-to-Market Software , 2000, IEEE Softw..

[19]  Susan Dart Configuration management: the missing link in Web engineering , 2000 .

[20]  Stefano Ceri,et al.  Web Modeling Language (WebML): a modeling language for designing Web sites , 2000, Comput. Networks.