Is There a Relationship of Operator and Center Volume With Access Site–Related Outcomes?: An Analysis From the British Cardiovascular Intervention Society
暂无分享,去创建一个
I. Buchan | N. Curzen | C. Kwok | M. Mamas | T. Kinnaird | P. Ludman | M. de Belder | J. Nolan | W. Hulme | M. Sperrin | Helen Rushton
[1] S. Anderson,et al. Impact of age on access site‐related outcomes in 469,983 percutaneous coronary intervention procedures: Insights from the British Cardiovascular Intervention Society , 2015, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.
[2] G. Wells,et al. Efficacy of Radial Versus Femoral Access in the Acute Coronary Syndrome: Is it the Operator or the Operation That Matters? , 2015, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.
[3] Sunil V. Rao,et al. Radial versus femoral access in patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing invasive management: a randomised multicentre trial , 2015, The Lancet.
[4] S. Anderson,et al. Impact of age on the prognostic value of left ventricular function in relation to procedural outcomes following percutaneous coronary intervention: Insights from the British cardiovascular intervention society , 2015, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.
[5] S. Anderson,et al. Impact of left ventricular function in relation to procedural outcomes following percutaneous coronary intervention: insights from the British Cardiovascular Intervention Society. , 2014, European heart journal.
[6] W. O’Neill,et al. Impact of Annual Operator and Institutional Volume on Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Outcomes: A 5-Year United States Experience (2005–2009) , 2014, Circulation.
[7] M. Dalby,et al. Radial Versus Femoral Access Is Associated With Reduced Complications and Mortality in Patients With Non–ST-Segment–Elevation Myocardial Infarction: An Observational Cohort Study of 10 095 Patients , 2014, Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions.
[8] R. Yeh,et al. Association Between Operator Procedure Volume and Patient Outcomes in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis , 2014, Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes.
[9] Mitchell W Krucoff,et al. The Learning Curve for Transradial Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Among Operators in the United States: A Study From the National Cardiovascular Data Registry , 2014, Circulation.
[10] S. Anderson,et al. Arterial access site utilization in cardiogenic shock in the United Kingdom: is radial access feasible? , 2014, American heart journal.
[11] S. Yusuf,et al. Procedural volume and outcomes with radial or femoral access for coronary angiography and intervention. , 2014, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[12] S. Anderson,et al. Baseline bleeding risk and arterial access site practice in relation to procedural outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention. , 2013, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[13] Deepak L. Bhatt,et al. Adoption of Transradial Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and Outcomes According to Center Radial Volume in the Veterans Affairs Healthcare System: Insights From the Veterans Affairs Clinical Assessment, Reporting, and Tracking (CART) Program , 2013, Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions.
[14] Helen Routledge,et al. Influence of arterial access site selection on outcomes in primary percutaneous coronary intervention: are the results of randomized trials achievable in clinical practice? , 2013, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.
[15] L. Jacoby. Effects of Radial versus Femoral Artery Access in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndromes with or without ST-segment Elevation , 2013 .
[16] J. Messenger,et al. Clinical ResearchInterventional CardiologyThe Prevalence and Outcomes of Transradial Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Analysis From the National Cardiovascular Data Registry (2007 to 2011) , 2013 .
[17] E. Romagnoli,et al. Radial versus femoral randomized investigation in ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome: the RIFLE-STEACS (Radial Versus Femoral Randomized Investigation in ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome) study. , 2012, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[18] Stef van Buuren,et al. MICE: Multivariate Imputation by Chained Equations in R , 2011 .
[19] John J. Graham,et al. Characterization of Operator Learning Curve for Transradial Coronary Interventions , 2011, Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions.
[20] P. Ludman. British Cardiovascular Intervention Society Registry for audit and quality assessment of percutaneous coronary interventions in the United Kingdom , 2011, Heart.
[21] Sunil V. Rao,et al. Radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography and intervention in patients with acute coronary syndromes (RIVAL): a randomised, parallel group, multicentre trial , 2011, The Lancet.
[22] Sunil V. Rao,et al. Design and rationale of the radial versus femoral access for coronary intervention (RIVAL) trial: a randomized comparison of radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography or intervention in patients with acute coronary syndromes. , 2011, American heart journal.
[23] Olivier F Bertrand,et al. Transradial approach for coronary angiography and interventions: results of the first international transradial practice survey. , 2010, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.
[24] J D Hilton,et al. Association of the arterial access site at angioplasty with transfusion and mortality: the M.O.R.T.A.L study (Mortality benefit Of Reduced Transfusion after percutaneous coronary intervention via the Arm or Leg) , 2008, Heart.
[25] Paul T. von Hippel,et al. Regression with missing Ys: An improved strategy for analyzing multiply imputed data , 2007, 1605.01095.
[26] Nicole A. Lazar,et al. Statistical Analysis With Missing Data , 2003, Technometrics.
[27] R. Simon,et al. Flexible regression models with cubic splines. , 1989, Statistics in medicine.
[28] S. Anderson,et al. Access site practice and procedural outcomes in relation to clinical presentation in 439,947 patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention in the United kingdom. , 2015, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.
[29] R Core Team,et al. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .
[30] Russell V. Lenth,et al. Statistical Analysis With Missing Data (2nd ed.) (Book) , 2004 .