Correlation of Quantitative Dual-Energy Computed Tomography Iodine Maps and Abdominal Computed Tomography Perfusion Measurements: Are Single-Acquisition Dual-Energy Computed Tomography Iodine Maps More Than a Reduced-Dose Surrogate of Conventional Computed Tomography Perfusion?

ObjectivesStudy objectives were the quantitative evaluation of whether conventional abdominal computed tomography (CT) perfusion measurements mathematically correlate with quantitative single-acquisition dual-energy CT (DECT) iodine concentration maps, the determination of the optimum time of acquisition for achieving maximum correlation, and the estimation of the potential for radiation exposure reduction when replacing conventional CT perfusion by single-acquisition DECT iodine concentration maps. Materials and MethodsDual-energy CT perfusion sequences were dynamically acquired over 51 seconds (34 acquisitions every 1.5 seconds) in 24 patients with histologically verified pancreatic carcinoma using dual-source DECT at tube potentials of 80 kVp and 140 kVp. Using software developed in-house, perfusion maps were calculated from 80-kVp image series using the maximum slope model after deformable motion correction. In addition, quantitative iodine maps were calculated for each of the 34 DECT acquisitions per patient. Within a manual segmentation of the pancreas, voxel-by-voxel correlation between the perfusion map and each of the iodine maps was calculated for each patient to determine the optimum time of acquisition topt defined as the acquisition time of the iodine map with the highest correlation coefficient. Subsequently, regions of interest were placed inside the tumor and inside healthy pancreatic tissue, and correlation between mean perfusion values and mean iodine concentrations within these regions of interest at topt was calculated for the patient sample. ResultsThe mean (SD) topt was 31.7 (5.4) seconds after the start of contrast agent injection. The mean (SD) perfusion values for healthy pancreatic and tumor tissues were 67.8 (26.7) mL per 100 mL/min and 43.7 (32.2) mL per 100 mL/min, respectively. At topt, the mean (SD) iodine concentrations were 2.07 (0.71) mg/mL in healthy pancreatic and 1.69 (0.98) mg/mL in tumor tissue, respectively. Overall, the correlation between perfusion values and iodine concentrations was high (0.77), with correlation of 0.89 in tumor and of 0.56 in healthy pancreatic tissue at topt. Comparing radiation exposure associated with a single DECT acquisition at topt (0.18 mSv) to that of an 80 kVp CT perfusion sequence (2.96 mSv) indicates that an average reduction of Deff by 94% could be achieved by replacing conventional CT perfusion with a single-acquisition DECT iodine concentration map. ConclusionsQuantitative iodine concentration maps obtained with DECT correlate well with conventional abdominal CT perfusion measurements, suggesting that quantitative iodine maps calculated from a single DECT acquisition at an organ-specific and patient-specific optimum time of acquisition might be able to replace conventional abdominal CT perfusion measurements if the time of acquisition is carefully calibrated. This could lead to large reductions of radiation exposure to the patients while offering quantitative perfusion data for diagnosis.

[1]  C S Patlak,et al.  Graphical Evaluation of Blood-to-Brain Transfer Constants from Multiple-Time Uptake Data , 1983, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[2]  Thomas Henzler,et al.  Contrast-Enhanced Dual-Energy CT of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors: Is Iodine-Related Attenuation a Potential Indicator of Tumor Response? , 2012, Investigative radiology.

[3]  A. Macovski,et al.  Energy-selective reconstructions in X-ray computerised tomography , 1976, Physics in medicine and biology.

[4]  Hiroki Shirato,et al.  Differences in CT perfusion maps generated by different commercial software: quantitative analysis by using identical source data of acute stroke patients. , 2010, Radiology.

[5]  D. Lu,et al.  Two-phase helical CT for pancreatic tumors: pancreatic versus hepatic phase enhancement of tumor, pancreas, and vascular structures. , 1996, Radiology.

[6]  C. Patlak,et al.  Graphical Evaluation of Blood-to-Brain Transfer Constants from Multiple-Time Uptake Data. Generalizations , 1985, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[7]  M. Macari,et al.  Dual energy CT: preliminary observations and potential clinical applications in the abdomen , 2008, European Radiology.

[8]  M. Reiser,et al.  Material differentiation by dual energy CT: initial experience , 2007, European Radiology.

[9]  Patrik Rogalla,et al.  Whole-organ perfusion of the pancreas using dynamic volume CT in patients with primary pancreas carcinoma: acquisition technique, post-processing and initial results , 2009, European Radiology.

[10]  Andrew C Larson,et al.  Quantitative dual energy CT measurements in rabbit VX2 liver tumors: Comparison to perfusion CT measurements and histopathological findings. , 2012, European journal of radiology.

[11]  P. Shrimpton,et al.  Assessment of Patient Dose in CT , 2004 .

[12]  Bernhard Krauss,et al.  The Importance of Spectral Separation: An Assessment of Dual-Energy Spectral Separation for Quantitative Ability and Dose Efficiency , 2015, Investigative radiology.

[13]  S Skornitzke,et al.  Qualitative and quantitative evaluation of rigid and deformable motion correction algorithms using dual-energy CT images in view of application to CT perfusion measurements in abdominal organs affected by breathing motion. , 2015, The British journal of radiology.

[14]  Pierre Bedossa,et al.  Pancreatic endocrine tumors: tumor blood flow assessed with perfusion CT reflects angiogenesis and correlates with prognostic factors. , 2009, Radiology.

[15]  H. Kauczor,et al.  Dual-Energy Computed-Tomography Cholangiography in Potential Donors for Living-Related Liver Transplantation: Initial Experience , 2010, Investigative radiology.

[16]  Tao Jiang,et al.  Monitoring Response to Antiangiogenic Treatment and Predicting Outcomes in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma Using Image Biomarkers, CT Perfusion, Tumor Density, and Tumor Size (RECIST) , 2012, Investigative radiology.

[17]  Meinhard Kieser,et al.  Computed Tomography Perfusion Analysis of Pancreatic Carcinoma , 2012, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[18]  B. Yeh,et al.  Dual-energy and low-kVp CT in the abdomen. , 2009, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[19]  Jean-Philippe Thirion,et al.  Image matching as a diffusion process: an analogy with Maxwell's demons , 1998, Medical Image Anal..

[20]  K. Miles,et al.  Measurement of tissue perfusion by dynamic computed tomography. , 1991, The British journal of radiology.

[21]  M Kieser,et al.  Dual-energy perfusion-CT of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. , 2013, European journal of radiology.

[22]  K. Miles,et al.  Perfusion CT for the assessment of tumour vascularity: which protocol? , 2003, The British journal of radiology.

[23]  P. Mueller,et al.  Pancreatic-phase versus portal vein-phase helical CT of the pancreas: optimal temporal window for evaluation of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. , 1999, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[24]  M. Reiser,et al.  Saving Dose in Triple-Rule-Out Computed Tomography Examination Using a High-Pitch Dual Spiral Technique , 2010, Investigative radiology.