Experience, corpulence and decision making in ant foraging

SUMMARY Social groups are structured by the decisions of their members. Social insects typically divide labour: some decide to stay in the nest while others forage for the colony. Two sources of information individuals may use when deciding whether to forage are their own experience of recent task performance and their own physiology, e.g. fat reserves (corpulence). The former is primarily personal information; the latter may give an indication of the food reserves of the whole colony. These factors are hard to separate because typically leaner individuals are also more experienced foragers. We designed an experiment to determine whether foraging specialisation is physiological or experience based (or both). We invented a system of automatic doors controlled by radio-tag information to manipulate task access and decouple these two sources of information. Our results show that when information from corpulence and recent experience conflict, ants behave only in accordance with their corpulence. However, among ants physiologically inclined to forage (less corpulent ants), recent experience of success positively influenced their propensity to forage again. Hence, foraging is organised via long-term physiological differences among individuals resulting in a relatively stable response threshold distribution, with fine-tuning provided by short-term learning processes. Through these simple rules, colonies can organise their foraging effort both robustly and flexibly.

[1]  E. Robinson,et al.  Physiology as a caste-defining feature , 2009, Insectes Sociaux.

[2]  A. Philippides,et al.  Animal Cognition: Multi-modal Interactions in Ant Learning , 2010, Current Biology.

[3]  B. Roelen,et al.  An overview on the diversity of cellular organelles during the germ cell cycle. , 2010, Histology and histopathology.

[4]  G. Robinson Regulation of division of labor in insect societies. , 1992, Annual review of entomology.

[5]  Gene E. Robinson,et al.  Worker nutrition and division of labour in honeybees , 2005, Animal Behaviour.

[6]  R. Jeanne,et al.  Worker lipid stores decrease with outside-nest task performance in wasps: Implications for the evolution of age polyethism , 1995, Experientia.

[7]  S. P. Roberts,et al.  The effects of age and behavioral development on honey bee (Apis mellifera) flight performance , 2009, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[8]  S. Hix,et al.  Voting patterns and alliance formation in the European Parliament , 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[9]  Lars Chittka,et al.  Learning, specialization, efficiency and task allocation in social insects , 2009, Communicative & integrative biology.

[10]  C. Hinde,et al.  Negotiations within the family over the supply of parental care , 2007, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[11]  Nigel R Franks,et al.  Flexible task allocation and the organization of work in ants , 2009, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[12]  Stig W Omholt,et al.  The hive bee to forager transition in honeybee colonies: the double repressor hypothesis. , 2003, Journal of theoretical biology.

[13]  A. Dornhaus,et al.  Decision making by small and large house-hunting ant colonies: one size fits all , 2006, Animal Behaviour.

[14]  Henry S. Pollock,et al.  Insulin signaling is involved in the regulation of worker division of labor in honey bee colonies , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[15]  Gene E Robinson,et al.  Nutritional status influences socially regulated foraging ontogeny in honey bees , 2005, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[16]  Eörs Szathmáry,et al.  The Major Transitions in Evolution , 1997 .

[17]  Gene E. Robinson,et al.  Regulation of honey bee age polyethism by juvenile hormone , 1987, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[18]  G. Theraulaz,et al.  Response threshold reinforcements and division of labour in insect societies , 1998, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[19]  S. L. Lima,et al.  Behavioral decisions made under the risk of predation: a review and prospectus , 1990 .

[20]  N. Lecomte Foraging: Behaviour and Ecology , 2008 .

[21]  Deborah M. Gordon,et al.  Behavioral Ecology Advance Access published January 22, 2007 Behavioral Ecology , 2022 .

[22]  Serban Nacu,et al.  How site fidelity leads to individual differences in the foraging activity of harvester ants , 2009 .

[23]  Thomas D. Seeley,et al.  Adaptive significance of the age polyethism schedule in honeybee colonies , 1982, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[24]  W. Tschinkel Sociometry and sociogenesis of colonies of the harvester ant, Pogonomyrmex badius: worker characteristics in relation to colony size and season , 1998, Insectes Sociaux.

[25]  E. Wilson,et al.  Caste and ecology in the social insects. , 1979, Monographs in population biology.

[26]  T. O. Richardson,et al.  Group dynamics and record signals in the ant Temnothorax albipennis , 2011, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[27]  F. Tripet,et al.  Foraging for Work and Age‐Based Polyethism: The Roles of Age and Previous Experience on Task Choice in Ants , 2004 .

[28]  S. Porter,et al.  Foragers of the harvester ant, Pogonomyrmex owyheei: a disposable caste? , 1981, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[29]  T. O. Richardson,et al.  Record Dynamics in Ants , 2010, PloS one.

[30]  N. R. Franks,et al.  Division of labour and seasonality in the ant Leptothorax albipennis: worker corpulence and its influence on behaviour , 2000, Animal Behaviour.

[31]  J. Fewell,et al.  Models of division of labor in social insects. , 2001, Annual review of entomology.

[32]  Gwenaël Kaminski,et al.  Individual Experience Alone Can Generate Lasting Division of Labor in Ants , 2007, Current Biology.

[33]  T. O. Richardson,et al.  Radio tagging reveals the roles of corpulence, experience and social information in ant decision making , 2009, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[34]  Chris Tofts,et al.  Foraging for work: how tasks allocate workers , 1994, Animal Behaviour.

[35]  Guy Theraulaz,et al.  Role and variability of response thresholds in the regulation of division of labor in insect societies , 1999 .

[36]  D. Gordon The organization of work in social insect colonies , 1996, Nature.

[37]  A. Dornhaus Specialization Does Not Predict Individual Efficiency in an Ant , 2008, PLoS biology.

[38]  B. Hall,et al.  Human cell type diversity, evolution, development, and classification with special reference to cells derived from the neural crest , 2006, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[39]  G. Ball,et al.  The neuroendocrine control of sex specific behavior in vertebrates: lessons from mammals and birds. , 2008, Current topics in developmental biology.

[40]  R. Peters,et al.  Caste-specific visual adaptations to distinct daily activity schedules in Australian Myrmecia ants , 2011, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[41]  A. Yang Seasonality, division of labor, and dynamics of colony-level nutrient storage in the ant Pheidole morrisi , 2006, Insectes Sociaux.

[42]  Richard James,et al.  Emergency networking: famine relief in ant colonies , 2010, Animal Behaviour.

[43]  E. Robinson,et al.  Do ants make direct comparisons? , 2009, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[44]  R. Matthews,et al.  Ants. , 1898, Science.

[45]  F. Ruano,et al.  High surface temperatures select for individual foraging in ants , 2000 .