Frequency selectivity and speech discrimination in sensorineural hearing loss.

Two supposed measures of auditory frequency selectivity--the critical band (CB) in loudness summation and the psychoacoustic tuning curve (PTC), Both measured at 1 kHz--were compared with the capacity for speech discrimination in patients with various cochlear disorders and a relatively flat audiometric pattern. The CB in loudness summation was correlated neither to the degree of hearing loss nor to the speech discrimination score. In contrast, the PTC changed with increasing hearing loss in the same manner as the electrophysiological tuning curve (FTC), i.e. rapidly deteriorating beyond normal limit values when the hearing loss exceeded 30--40 dB (HL). Nearly the same dependency of the degree of the hearing loss was demonstrated for the speech discrimination score (determined in noise and after filtering of the signal) and a significant correlation was present between this score and cochlear tuning, as expressed by the PTC. It is proposed that the PTC is a more valid measure of auditory frequency selectivity than the CB in loudness summation. If this is accepted the results seem to support the hypothesis of impaired frequency selectivity as a major cause for deteriorated speech discrimination in patients with cochlear disorders.

[1]  M. C. Martin.  Critical Bands in Sensori-Neural Hearing Loss , 1974 .

[2]  Phoneme discrimination in older persons under varying signal-to-noise conditions. , 1971, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[3]  J. D. Hood,et al.  Speech Audiometry in Conductive and Sensorineural Hearing loss , 1971 .

[4]  I Hochberg,et al.  Most comfortable listening for the loudness and intelligibility of speech. , 1975, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[5]  Critical Bands and the Discrimination of Intensity Relations in Two‐Tone Complexes , 1966 .

[6]  Requirements on speech processing hearing aids for the profoundly deaf, some preliminary remarks. , 1978, Scandinavian audiology. Supplementum.

[7]  C. K. Myers,et al.  Recruitment, pitch tests, and speechtone hearing discrepancies. , 1955, A.M.A. archives of otolaryngology.

[8]  C Elberling,et al.  Estimation of the critical bandwidth from loudness summation data. , 1978, Scandinavian audiology.

[9]  R W Gengel.  Temporal effects in frequency discrimination by hearing-impaired listeners. , 1973, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  E. de Boer,et al.  Critical bands and sensorineural hearing loss. , 1974, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[11]  Critical bandwidth in patients with a hearing loss induced by salicylates. , 1979, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[12]  Critical bandwidth in presbycusis. , 1979, Scandinavian audiology.

[13]  Bertram Schaf.  Chapter Five – Critical Bands , 1970 .

[14]  A. Schwartz,et al.  Variables influencing performance on speech-sound discrimination tests. , 1974, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[15]  E. Zwicker,et al.  Psychoacoustical tuning curves in audiology. , 1978, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[16]  B. Leshowitz,et al.  Measurement of nonlinearities in listeners with sensorineural hearing loss , 1977 .

[17]  Clinical critical band estimation. , 1978, Scandinavian audiology.

[18]  J. P. Wilson,et al.  THE FREQUENCY SELECTIVITY OF THE COCHLEA , 1973 .

[19]  P. Bonding.  Critical bandwidth in patients with acoustic neuroma. , 1979, Scandinavian audiology.

[20]  T. Palva,et al.  Critical evaluation of noise audiometry , 1953, The Laryngoscope.

[21]  Experiments Relating to the Perception of Formants , 1963 .

[22]  J. C. Steinberg,et al.  Factors Governing the Intelligibility of Speech Sounds , 1945 .

[23]  James Jerger,et al.  Masking by Octave Bands of Noise in Normal and Impaired Ears , 1960 .

[24]  Effects of Selective Narrow‐Band Filtering on the Perception by Normal Listeners of Harvard PB‐50 Word Lists , 1964 .

[25]  P. Bonding.  Critical bandwidth in loudness summation in sensorineural hearing loss. , 1979, British journal of audiology.

[26]  E. Zwicker.  On a Psychoacoustical Equivalent of Tuning Curves , 1974 .

[27]  B. Scharf,et al.  Model of loudness summation applied to impaired ears. , 1966, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[28]  Clinical psychophysics. Illustrated by the problem of auditory overload. , 1975, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[29]  E F Evans,et al.  The sharpening of cochlear frequency selectivity in the normal and abnormal cochlea. , 1975, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[30]  SOME FACTORS INFLUENCING THE RESULTS OF SPEECH TESTS OF CENTRAL AUDITORY FUNCTION , 1976 .

[31]  W O Olsen,et al.  Speech discrimination in quiet and in white noise by patients with peripheral and central lesions. , 1975, Acta oto-laryngologica.