When Stakeholders Perceive Threats and Risks Differently: the Use of Group Support Systems to Develop a Common Understanding and a Shared Response

We present a multi-phased action research project conducted at the department of Information Management - Customer Support and Operations in a large multi-national company. This department is in charge of IT service continuity and was asked to develop an IT response and recovery plan that had to be integrated within the organization’s overall business continuity plan. The department’s key challenge was to develop a response plan which incorporates the perspectives of the business managers whose perception of the threats and associated risks differed significantly from that of the IT managers. To develop such a shared response plan, we used group support systems and cognitive mapping techniques to identify both stakeholder groups’ perceptions of IT threats and risks. This allowed us to raise awareness in both groups for the other group’s different perspectives. We aggregated the responses into a shared response and recovery plan, representing the views of both groups. Our research has made clear to the stakeholder groups involved the necessity of sharing information and developing awareness to formulate a shared disaster recovery plan for ensuring business continuity and recovery.

[1]  Colin Eden,et al.  Contrasting Single User and Networked Group Decision Support Systems for Strategy Making , 2001 .

[2]  F. Ackermann,et al.  Strategic options in development and analysis (SODA) - using a computer to help with the management of strategic vision , 1989 .

[3]  C. Eden,et al.  Making Strategy: The Journey of Strategic Management , 1998 .

[4]  Ingoo Han,et al.  The IS risk analysis based on a business model , 2003, Inf. Manag..

[5]  Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al.  Social Decision Support Systems (SDSS) , 2002, Proceedings of the 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[6]  BARTEL VAN DE WALLE,et al.  TOWARDS GROUP AGREEMENT : THE SIGNIFICANCE OF PREFERENCE ANALYSIS , 2001 .

[7]  Xiang Yao,et al.  The Design of a Dynamic Emergency Response Management Information System (DERMIS) , 2004 .

[8]  Lev Vygotsky Mind in society , 1978 .

[9]  I. Janis Groupthink: Psychological Studies of Policy Decisions and Fiascoes , 1982 .

[10]  Fran Ackermann,et al.  Strategy development and implementation - the role of a group decision support system , 1992 .

[11]  Bartel Van de Walle,et al.  A relational analysis of decision makers' preferences , 2003, Int. J. Intell. Syst..

[12]  K. Gergen THE SOCIAL CONSTRUCTIONIST MOVEMENT IN MODERN PSYCHOLOGY , 1985 .

[13]  Anne-Françoise Rutkowski,et al.  Constructionist Theory to Explain Effects of GDSS , 2001 .

[14]  S. R. Hiltz The Network Nation , 1978 .

[15]  L. Festinger,et al.  Social pressures in informal groups , 1950 .

[16]  Greg J. Neimeyer Constructivist assessment : a casebook , 1993 .

[17]  B. Jones,et al.  Agendas and instability in American politics , 1993 .

[18]  Endel Tulving,et al.  Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory. , 1973 .

[19]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Interaction of task and technology to support large groups , 1989, Decis. Support Syst..

[20]  J. Piaget The construction of reality in the child , 1954 .

[21]  M. Deutsch,et al.  A study of normative and informational social influences upon individual judgement. , 1955, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[22]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  A foundation for the study of group decision support systems , 1987 .

[23]  G. Bower,et al.  Commentary on mood and memory. , 1987, Behaviour research and therapy.