Clinical Use of Cancer Biomarkers in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer
暂无分享,去创建一个
Catharine M. Sturgeon | Robert C. Bast | Per Hyltoft Petersen | György Sölétormos | Michael J. Duffy | P. H. Petersen | R. Bast | M. Duffy | C. Sturgeon | R. Verheijen | K. Gaarenstroom | G. Sölétormos | Suher Othman Abu Hassan | B. Tholander | J. Bonfrer | H. Troonen | Gian CarloTorre | Jan Kanty Kulpa | M. Tuxen | R. Molina | René H.M. Verheijen | Katja N. Gaarenstroom | Suher Othman Abu Hassan | Bengt Tholander | Johannes M. Bonfrer | Hugo Troonen | Gian CarloTorre | Jan Kanty Kulpa | Malgorzata K. Tuxen | Raphael Molina | P. Petersen
[1] I. Brandslund,et al. Prognostic Impact of Prechemotherapy Serum Levels of HER2, CA125, and HE4 in Ovarian Cancer Patients , 2011, International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer.
[2] R. Bast,et al. A radioimmunoassay using a monoclonal antibody to monitor the course of epithelial ovarian cancer. , 1983, The New England journal of medicine.
[3] T. Kitanaka,et al. A randomized study of screening for ovarian cancer: a multicenter study in Japan , 2007, International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer.
[4] Fake Li,et al. Does risk for ovarian malignancy algorithm excel human epididymis protein 4 and ca125 in predicting epithelial ovarian cancer: A meta-analysis , 2012, BMC Cancer.
[5] R. Molina,et al. Comparison of serum human epididymis protein 4 with cancer antigen 125 as a tumor marker in patients with malignant and nonmalignant diseases. , 2011, Clinical chemistry.
[6] Chen Yang,et al. Diagnostic Value of Serum Human Epididymis Protein 4 (HE4) in Ovarian Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis , 2012, International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer.
[7] The role of the generalist obstetrician-gynecologist in the early detection of ovarian cancer. , 2003, International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics.
[8] Dirk Timmerman,et al. Evaluating the risk of ovarian cancer before surgery using the ADNEX model to differentiate between benign, borderline, early and advanced stage invasive, and secondary metastatic tumours: prospective multicentre diagnostic study , 2014, BMJ : British Medical Journal.
[9] R. Bast. CA 125 and the detection of recurrent ovarian cancer , 2010, Cancer.
[10] P. Zola,et al. Cancer Antigen 125: Lost to Follow-Up? , 2012, International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer.
[11] Shuang Yu,et al. Diagnostic value of HE4 for ovarian cancer: a meta-analysis , 2012, Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine.
[12] R. Edwards. Tribute to Patrick Steptoe: beginnings of laparoscopy. , 1989, Human reproduction.
[13] G. Morgante,et al. Comparison of two malignancy risk indices based on serum CA125, ultrasound score and menopausal status in the diagnosis of ovarian masses , 1999, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.
[14] I. Christensen,et al. Evaluation of HE4, CA125, risk of ovarian malignancy algorithm (ROMA) and risk of malignancy index (RMI) as diagnostic tools of epithelial ovarian cancer in patients with a pelvic mass. , 2012, Gynecologic oncology.
[15] P. Vasey,et al. ESMO Minimum Clinical Recommendations for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of epithelial ovarian carcinoma. , 2005, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.
[16] U. Matulonis,et al. Anti-angiogenic Agents in Ovarian Cancer: Dawn of a New Era? , 2011, Current oncology reports.
[17] M. Federico,et al. Significance of early changes in the serum CA-125 antigen level on overall survival in advanced ovarian cancer. , 2006, Gynecologic oncology.
[18] Corneel Coens,et al. Early versus delayed treatment of relapsed ovarian cancer (MRC OV05/EORTC 55955): a randomised trial , 2010, The Lancet.
[19] P. Dombernowsky,et al. Serum tumour marker CA 125 in monitoring of ovarian cancer during first-line chemotherapy , 2001, British Journal of Cancer.
[20] Screening for ovarian cancer: recommendations and rationale. American College of Physicians. , 1994, Annals of internal medicine.
[21] G. Rustin,et al. Role of tumour markers in monitoring epithelial ovarian cancer , 2000, British Journal of Cancer.
[22] H. Blanton. To monitor or not to monitor. , 1994, Pediatric dentistry.
[23] G. Rustin,et al. Use of CA-125 to define progression of ovarian cancer in patients with persistently elevated levels. , 2001, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[24] R. Bast,et al. The CA 125 tumour-associated antigen: a review of the literature. , 1989, Human reproduction.
[25] M. Poutanen,et al. Serum HE4 concentration is not dependent on menstrual cycle or hormonal treatment among endometriosis patients and healthy premenopausal women. , 2012, Gynecologic oncology.
[26] Giuseppe Lippi,et al. The ROMA (Risk of Ovarian Malignancy Algorithm) for estimating the risk of epithelial ovarian cancer in women presenting with pelvic mass: is it really useful? , 2011, Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine.
[27] P. Dombernowsky,et al. Serum tumor marker CA 125 for monitoring ovarian cancer during follow-up , 2002, Scandinavian journal of clinical and laboratory investigation.
[28] Z. Hernádi,et al. Elevated human epididymis protein 4 concentrations in chronic kidney disease , 2012, Annals of clinical biochemistry.
[29] Hong Zheng,et al. Serum HE4 as a Useful Biomarker in Discriminating Ovarian Cancer From Benign Pelvic Disease , 2012, International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer.
[30] Matthew Burnell,et al. Sensitivity and specificity of multimodal and ultrasound screening for ovarian cancer, and stage distribution of detected cancers: results of the prevalence screen of the UK Collaborative Trial of Ovarian Cancer Screening (UKCTOCS) , 2009, Journal of Family Planning and Reproductive Health Care.
[31] A. Tailor,et al. Prospective evaluation of three different models for the pre‐operative diagnosis of ovarian cancer , 2000, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.
[32] I. Jacobs,et al. Results of annual screening in phase I of the United Kingdom familial ovarian cancer screening study highlight the need for strict adherence to screening schedule. , 2013, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[33] Tore Halvorsen,et al. Evaluation of a risk of malignancy index based on serum CA125, ultrasound findings and menopausal status in the pre‐operative diagnosis of pelvic masses , 1996, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.
[34] J. Gohagan,et al. Effect of screening on ovarian cancer mortality: the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Randomized Controlled Trial. , 2011, JAMA.
[35] Steven J Skates,et al. A novel multiple marker bioassay utilizing HE4 and CA125 for the prediction of ovarian cancer in patients with a pelvic mass. , 2009, Gynecologic oncology.
[36] T. Bourne,et al. Logistic regression model to distinguish between the benign and malignant adnexal mass before surgery: a multicenter study by the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis Group. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[37] M. Parmar,et al. Definitions for Response and Progression in Ovarian Cancer Clinical Trials Incorporating RECIST 1.1 and CA 125 Agreed by the Gynecological Cancer Intergroup (GCIG) , 2010, International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer.
[38] P. H. Petersen,et al. Biological variation of total prostate-specific antigen: a survey of published estimates and consequences for clinical practice. , 2005, Clinical chemistry.
[39] Richard G. Moore,et al. A 2‐stage ovarian cancer screening strategy using the Risk of Ovarian Cancer Algorithm (ROCA) identifies early‐stage incident cancers and demonstrates high positive predictive value , 2013, Cancer.
[40] Robert C. Bast,et al. Combined use of biomarkers for detection of ovarian cancer in high-risk women , 2010, Tumor Biology.
[41] R. Bast,et al. Tumor marker utility grading system: a framework to evaluate clinical utility of tumor markers. , 1996, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.
[42] T. Bourne,et al. Multicentre external validation of IOTA prediction models and RMI by operators with varied training , 2013, British Journal of Cancer.
[43] Xiaoxiang Chen,et al. Nadir CA-125 level as prognosis indicator of high-grade serous ovarian cancer , 2013, Journal of Ovarian Research.
[44] K. Lu,et al. Endometrial and ovarian cancer in women with Lynch syndrome: update in screening and prevention , 2013, Familial Cancer.
[45] J. Hendriks,et al. CA125 nadir concentration is an independent predictor of tumor recurrence in patients with ovarian cancer: a population-based study. , 2010, Gynecologic oncology.
[46] J. Riedinger,et al. Prognostic value of serum CA 125 bi-exponential decrease during first line paclitaxel/platinum chemotherapy: a French multicentric study. , 2008, Gynecologic oncology.
[47] I. Jacobs,et al. Protein expression levels of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) in Danish ovarian cancer patients: from the Danish ‘MALOVA’ovarian cancer study , 2008, Pathology.
[48] NIH consensus conference. Ovarian cancer. Screening, treatment, and follow-up. NIH Consensus Development Panel on Ovarian Cancer. , 1995, JAMA.
[49] D Timmerman,et al. HE4 and CA125 as a diagnostic test in ovarian cancer: prospective validation of the Risk of Ovarian Malignancy Algorithm , 2011, British Journal of Cancer.
[50] K. Baggerly,et al. The emerging role of HE4 in the evaluation of epithelial ovarian and endometrial carcinomas. , 2013, Oncology.
[51] J. H. Price,et al. Serum CA19.9 levels are commonly elevated in primary ovarian mucinous tumours but cannot be used to predict the histological subtype , 2010, Journal of Clinical Pathology.
[52] M. Duffy,et al. Design of tumor biomarker-monitoring trials: a proposal by the European Group on Tumor Markers. , 2013, Clinical chemistry.
[53] M. Duffy,et al. CA125 in ovarian cancer: European Group on Tumor Markers guidelines for clinical use , 2004, International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer.
[54] Robert C. Bast,et al. Ovarian cancer: screening, treatment, and followup. , 1995, NIH consensus statement.
[55] J. Baselga,et al. Nadir CA-125 concentration in the normal range as an independent prognostic factor for optimally treated advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. , 2008, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.
[56] N. Viñolas,et al. Mucins CA 125, CA 19.9, CA 15.3 and TAG-72.3 as Tumor Markers in Patients with Lung Cancer: Comparison with CYFRA 21-1, CEA, SCC and NSE , 2008, Tumor Biology.
[57] G. Rustin,et al. Defining progression of ovarian carcinoma during follow-up according to CA 125: a North Thames Ovary Group Study. , 1996, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.
[58] D. Oram,et al. A risk of malignancy index incorporating CA 125, ultrasound and menopausal status for the accurate preoperative diagnosis of ovarian cancer , 1991, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.
[59] H E Lambert,et al. Defining response of ovarian carcinoma to initial chemotherapy according to serum CA 125. , 1996, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[60] A. Berchuck,et al. Large Prospective Study of Ovarian Cancer Screening in High-Risk Women: CA125 Cut-Point Defined by Menopausal Status , 2011, Cancer Prevention Research.
[61] S. Doniņa,et al. An ovarian cancer malignancy risk index composed of HE4, CA125, ultrasonographic score, and menopausal status: use in differentiation of ovarian cancers and benign lesions , 2012, Tumor Biology.
[62] J. Oosterwijk,et al. Time to stop ovarian cancer screening in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers? , 2009, International journal of cancer.
[63] A. Gadducci,et al. Serum and tissue biomarkers as predictive and prognostic variables in epithelial ovarian cancer. , 2009, Critical reviews in oncology/hematology.
[64] G. Rustin,et al. Use of CA-125 to assess response to new agents in ovarian cancer trials. , 2003, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[65] P. Dombernowsky,et al. Tumor markers cancer antigen 15.3, carcinoembryonic antigen, and tissue polypeptide antigen for monitoring metastatic breast cancer during first-line chemotherapy and follow-up. , 1996, Clinical chemistry.
[66] R. Molina,et al. HE4 a novel tumour marker for ovarian cancer: comparison with CA 125 and ROMA algorithm in patients with gynaecological diseases , 2011, Tumor Biology.
[67] R. Kryscio,et al. Long-Term Survival of Women With Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Detected by Ultrasonographic Screening , 2011, Obstetrics and gynecology.
[68] A. Tailor,et al. Risk of malignancy index for referral of ovarian cancer cases to a tertiary center: does it identify the correct cases? , 2005, International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer.
[69] S. Pignata,et al. Follow-up with CA125 after primary therapy of advanced ovarian cancer: in favor of continuing to prescribe CA125 during follow-up. , 2011, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.
[70] L. Frati,et al. HE4 combined with MDCT imaging is a good marker in the evaluation of disease extension in advanced epithelial ovarian carcinoma , 2012, Tumor Biology.
[71] H. Nielsen,et al. National Academy of Clinical Biochemistry laboratory medicine practice guidelines for use of tumor markers in testicular, prostate, colorectal, breast, and ovarian cancers. , 2008, Clinical chemistry.
[72] G. Guyatt,et al. Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations , 2004, BMJ : British Medical Journal.
[73] C. Sturgeon. Practice guidelines for tumor marker use in the clinic. , 2002, Clinical chemistry.
[74] M. Duffy,et al. The National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) guidelines for early detection of ovarian cancer: the pivotal role of the clinical laboratory , 2011, Annals of clinical biochemistry.