Computationally efficient explicit nonlinear analyses using reduced integration-based solid-shell finite elements

Abstract Solid-shell formulations based on reduced integration with hourglass stabilization have several advantages. Among these are the smaller number of Gauss points and the direct modelling of the thickness stretch, a feature which is usually not present in standard degenerated shell elements. The latter issue is especially important for applications where contact is involved, e.g. for almost all relevant systems in production technology. Obviously this makes solid-shell formulations very attractive for their use in industrial design. A major disadvantage in the context of explicit analyses is, however, the fact that the critical time step is determined by the thickness of the solid-shell element which is usually smaller than the smallest in-plane dimension. Therefore, four-node shells (where the critical time step is determined by the in-plane dimensions) are still often preferred for explicit analysis. In the present paper we suggest several techniques to overcome this difficulty, also in the case of problems dominated by nonlinearities such as finite deformations, elastoplasticity and contact. Reference is made to an 8-node hexahedron solid-shell element recently proposed by Schwarze and Reese (2011) [32] in an implicit context. First of all, the time steps in explicit analyses are so small that it may be not necessary to update the hourglass stabilization and the implicit computation of the internal element degrees-of-freedom in every time step. Performing the update in only every hundredth step or computing an explicit rather than implicit update can reduce the computational effort up to about 50%. Another important issue is selective mass scaling which means to modify the mass matrix in such a way that the speed of sound in thickness direction is reduced. This enables the choice of a larger time step. The CPU effort can be finally noticeably decreased without changing the structural response significantly. This makes the presently used solid-shell formulation competitive to four-node shells, also for explicit analysis.

[1]  Greger Bergman,et al.  A finite element model for thermomechanical analysis of sheet metal forming , 2004 .

[2]  Boris Štok,et al.  Improved explicit integration in plasticity , 2010 .

[3]  Peter E. McHugh,et al.  Comparison of the implicit and explicit finite element methods using crystal plasticity , 2007 .

[4]  Mattias Unosson,et al.  Selective mass scaling for explicit finite element analyses , 2005 .

[5]  Stefanie Reese,et al.  Explicit Simulation of Forming Processes Using a Novel Solid-Shell Concept Based on Reduced Integration , 2012 .

[6]  Stefanie Reese,et al.  A large deformation solid‐shell concept based on reduced integration with hourglass stabilization , 2007 .

[7]  E. Ramm,et al.  Shear deformable shell elements for large strains and rotations , 1997 .

[8]  L. Vu-Quoc,et al.  Efficient and accurate multilayer solid‐shell element: non‐linear materials at finite strain , 2005 .

[9]  J. M. A. César de Sá,et al.  The enhanced assumed strain method for the isogeometric analysis of nearly incompressible deformation of solids , 2012 .

[10]  Ying-hong Peng,et al.  A stabilized underintegrated enhanced assumed strain solid-shell element for geometrically nonlinear plate/shell analysis , 2011 .

[11]  Giuseppe Cocchetti,et al.  Selective mass scaling and critical time-step estimate for explicit dynamics analyses with solid-shell elements , 2013 .

[12]  J. C. Simo,et al.  Geometrically non‐linear enhanced strain mixed methods and the method of incompatible modes , 1992 .

[13]  Christian Miehe,et al.  Anisotropic elastic–plastic analysis of shells at large strains. A comparison of multiplicative and additive approaches to enhanced finite element design and constitutive modelling , 2004 .

[14]  Sven Klinkel,et al.  A continuum based three-dimensional shell element for laminated structures , 1999 .

[15]  Chiara Bisagni,et al.  Dynamic buckling of fiber composite shells under impulsive axial compression , 2005 .

[16]  David W. Sleight,et al.  Simulating Nonlinear Deformations of Solar Sail Membranes Using Explicit Time Integration , 2004 .

[17]  Jerry I. Lin,et al.  Explicit algorithms for the nonlinear dynamics of shells , 1984 .

[18]  Shuo Ma,et al.  Modeling of the Perfectly Matched Layer Absorbing Boundaries and Intrinsic Attenuation in Explicit Finite-Element Methods , 2006 .

[19]  H. Askes,et al.  Penalty methods for time domain computational dynamics based on positive and negative inertia , 2009 .

[20]  Mattias Unosson,et al.  Selective mass scaling for thin walled structures modeled with tri-linear solid elements , 2004 .

[21]  J. Z. Zhu,et al.  The finite element method , 1977 .

[22]  Jeong Whan Yoon,et al.  Enhanced assumed strain (EAS) and assumed natural strain (ANS) methods for one‐point quadrature solid‐shell elements , 2008 .

[23]  Alain Combescure,et al.  An improved assumed strain solid–shell element formulation with physical stabilization for geometric non‐linear applications and elastic–plastic stability analysis , 2009 .

[24]  Peter Wriggers,et al.  Finite element concepts for finite elastoplastic strains and isotropic stress response in shells: theoretical and computational analysis , 1999 .

[25]  Ted Belytschko,et al.  Eigenvalues and Stable Time Steps for the Uniform Strain Hexahedron and Quadrilateral , 1984 .

[26]  L. M. Li,et al.  An Explicit Formulation of Solid-Shell Element and Its Application in Sheet Metal Forming Processes , 2011 .

[27]  Wen Zhong,et al.  Three-dimensional finite element simulation of medium thick plate metal forming and springback , 2012 .

[28]  Stefanie Reese,et al.  A reduced integration solid‐shell finite element based on the EAS and the ANS concept—Large deformation problems , 2011 .

[29]  P. Lall,et al.  Solder Joint Reliability in Electronics Under Shock and Vibration Using Explicit Finite-Element Submodeling , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Electronics Packaging Manufacturing.

[30]  M. Harnau,et al.  Artificial kinematics and simple stabilization of solid-shell elements occurring in highly constrained situations and applications in composite sheet forming simulation , 2006 .

[31]  E. Stein,et al.  An assumed strain approach avoiding artificial thickness straining for a non‐linear 4‐node shell element , 1995 .

[32]  Sven Klinkel,et al.  A robust non-linear solid shell element based on a mixed variational formulation , 2006 .

[33]  K. D. Kim,et al.  A resultant 8-node solid-shell element for geometrically nonlinear analysis , 2005 .