Enhanced behavioural control by conditioned reinforcers following microinjections of d-amphetamine into the nucleus accumbens

Stimulant drugs have been shown to enhance the control over behaviour exerted by stimuli previously correlated with primary reinforcers, termed conditioned reinforcers (CR). Experiment 1 examined the possible neuroanatomical specificity of the enhancement of conditioned reinforcement following intracerebral injections ofd-amphetamine. Thirsty rats were trained to associate, a light with water. In the test phase, water was no longer presented but the light (CR) was intermittently produced by responding on one of two novel levers. Rats with bilateral guide cannulae aimed at the nucleus accumbens, posterior caudate nucleus, or medio-dorsal nucleus of the thalamus received four counterbalanced microinfusions ofd-amphetamine (10, 20, 30 μg/2 μl) or vehicle (control) over 4 test days. There was a dose-dependent selective increase in responding on the lever that produced the light (CR) with intra-accumbensd-amphetamine infusions. Quantitatively similar, but much more variable effects were found with intra-caudate infusions and no effects following intra-thalamicd-amphetamine. Experiment 2 provided evidence that the enhanced control over responding by a CR with intra-accumbensd-amphetamine is behaviourally specific. Three groups of rats received a compound tone — plus —light stimulus that was positively, negatively or randomly correlated with water during training. Intra-accumbensd-amphetamine produced selective increases in responding only if the contingent stimulus had been positively correlated. The results suggest that the nucleus accumbens may play an important role ind-amphetamine's enhanced control over behaviour exerted by conditioned reinforcers.

[1]  R. Bugelski Extinction with and without sub-goal reinforcement. , 1938 .

[2]  B. Brown,et al.  PHARMACOLOGIC STUDIES ON A NEW CENTRAL STIMULANT, α-(2-PIPERIDYL)BENZHYDROL HYDROCHLORIDE (MRD-108) , 1954 .

[3]  B. J. Winer Statistical Principles in Experimental Design , 1992 .

[4]  L. Pellegrino,et al.  stereotaxic atlas of the rat brain , 1967 .

[5]  M. Mishkin,et al.  Limbic lesions and the problem of stimulus--reinforcement associations. , 1972, Experimental neurology.

[6]  N. Mackintosh The psychology of animal learning , 1974 .

[7]  T. Robbins Relationship between reward-enhancing and stereotypical effects of psychomotor stimulant drugs , 1976, Nature.

[8]  J. V. van Rossum,et al.  Effects of chemical stimulation of the mesolimbic dopamine system upon locomotor activity. , 1976, European journal of pharmacology.

[9]  H. Fibiger,et al.  On the role of ascending catecholaminergic systems in intravenous self-administration of cocaine , 1977, Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior.

[10]  S. Goldberg,et al.  Drug self-administration by laboratory animals: control by schedules of reinforcement. , 1978, Annual review of pharmacology and toxicology.

[11]  A. Björklund,et al.  Organization of Catecholamine Neurons in the Rat Central Nervous System , 1978 .

[12]  K. E. Moore,et al.  Destruction of dopaminergic nerve terminals in nucleus accumbens: Effect on d-amphetamine self-administration , 1979, Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior.

[13]  R. T. Kelleher,et al.  Enhancement of drug-seeking behavior by environmental stimuli associated with cocaine or morphine injections , 1979, Neuropharmacology.

[14]  J. E. Sherman,et al.  Temporal properties of the rewarding and aversive effects of amphetamine in rats , 1980, Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior.

[15]  Per Brodal,et al.  A stereotaxic atlas of the rat brain L. J. Pellegrino, A. S. Pellegrino & A. J. Cushman. Plenum Press, New York (1979). 122 Figures. £22.50 , 1980, Neuroscience.

[16]  R. Beninger,et al.  THE ACQUISITION OF RESPONDING WITH CONDITIONED REINFORCEMENT: EFFECTS OF COCAINE, (+)‐AMPHETAMINE AND PIPRADROL , 1981, British Journal of Pharmacology.

[17]  D. Kooy,et al.  Drug reinforcement studied by the use of place conditioning in rat , 1982, Brain Research.

[18]  A. Phillips,et al.  Dopaminergic substrates of amphetamine-induced place preference conditioning , 1982, Brain Research.

[19]  T. Robbins,et al.  Functional studies of the central catecholamines. , 1982, International review of neurobiology.

[20]  P. Jobe,et al.  Effect of increments in norepinephrine concentrations on seizure intensity in the genetically epilepsy-prone rat. , 1982, Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.

[21]  A. Kelley,et al.  The distribution of the projection from the hippocampal formation to the nucleus accumbens in the rat: An anterograde and retrograde-horseradish peroxidase study , 1982, Neuroscience.

[22]  T. Robbins,et al.  Effects of d-amphetamine and apomorphine upon operant behavior and schedule-induced licking in rats with 6-hydroxydopamine-induced lesions of the nucleus accumbens. , 1983, Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.

[23]  R. Beninger,et al.  The effects of pipradrol on the acquisition of responding with conditioned reinforcement: A role for sensory preconditioning , 2004, Psychopharmacology.

[24]  T. Robbins,et al.  Contrasting interactions of pipradrol, d-amphetamine, cocaine, cocaine analogues, apomorphine and other drugs with conditioned reinforcement , 2004, Psychopharmacology.

[25]  J. Stewart,et al.  Reinstatement of cocaine-reinforced responding in the rat , 2004, Psychopharmacology.

[26]  T. Robbins The acquisition of responding with conditioned reinforcement: Effects of pipradrol, methylphenidate, d-amphetamine, and nomifensine , 1978, Psychopharmacology.