Pressure susceptibility of polymer tablets as a critical property: a modified Heckel equation.

The pressure susceptibility (chip), which is defined as the decrease of porosity (epsilon) under pressure was investigated. Of special interest are compacts obtained at very low pressures, because of the transition between the state of a powder and the state of a tablet. This range was found to be critical in respect to a diverging pressure susceptibility. Above a critical porosity (epsilonc) or below the corresponding relative density (rhoc), no pressure susceptibility can be defined, because of no rigid structure exists. To take this into account, a simple function was proposed for the pressure susceptibility: chip approximately 1/(epsilonc - epsilon). This proposal leads to a new porosity vs pressure relationship. The new model was compared to the Heckel equation that involves a constant pressure susceptibility. Various polymers were tested from "out of die" measurements, and the new relationship was found superior to the Heckel equation. As a conclusion, the pressure susceptibility exhibits a curvature that can be called critical at low relative densities. Consequently, a better understanding evolves as to why the Heckel equation is not valid at low pressures. The new model has proven to be adequate for polymer tablets but, so far it is not clear whether other substances exhibit the same performance. Especially tableting materials exhibiting brittle fracture will be of interest considering their importance in compaction technology.

[1]  Paul J. Flory,et al.  Molecular Size Distribution in Three Dimensional Polymers. I. Gelation1 , 1941 .

[2]  S. Kirkpatrick.  Percolation and Conduction , 1973 .

[3]  A. Burger,et al.  On the application of the Heckel and Kawakita equations to powder compaction , 1985 .

[4]  H. Stanley,et al.  Introduction to Phase Transitions and Critical Phenomena , 1972 .

[5]  Rolf Landauer,et al.  The Electrical Resistance of Binary Metallic Mixtures , 1952 .

[6]  Modified Young's modulus of microcrystalline cellulose tablets and the directed continuum percolation model. , 1998, Pharmaceutical development and technology.

[7]  J. Hammersley,et al.  Percolation processes , 1957, Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[8]  A. R. Cooper,et al.  Compaction Behavior of Several Ceramic Powders , 1962 .

[9]  S. Redner,et al.  Introduction To Percolation Theory , 2018 .

[10]  Shechao Feng,et al.  Percolation on Elastic Networks: New Exponent and Threshold , 1984 .

[11]  J. Carstensen,et al.  The Athy—Heckel equation applied to granular agglomerates of basic tricalcium phosphate [3Ca3PO4)2·Ca(OH)2] , 1985 .

[12]  J MEAD,et al.  Mechanical properties of lungs. , 1961, Physiological reviews.

[13]  H. Leuenberger,et al.  Formation of a tablet: a site and bond percolation phenomenon. , 1992, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[14]  Jpk Seville,et al.  Agglomerate strength measurement using a uniaxial confined compression test , 1994 .

[15]  A. Yu,et al.  Packing of fine powders subjected to tapping , 1994 .

[16]  G. Alderborn,et al.  Pharmaceutical Powder Compaction Technology , 1995 .

[17]  H. Leuenberger,et al.  Percolation theory — a novel approach to solid dosage form design , 1987 .

[18]  H. Stanley,et al.  I Fractals and multifractals: the interplay of Physics and Geometry , 1991 .

[19]  W. Duncan-Hewitt.  Uniaxial Compaction Modelled using the Properties of Single Crystals , 1993 .

[20]  P. Rue,et al.  Limitations of the Heckel relation for predicting powder compaction mechanisms , 1978, The Journal of pharmacy and pharmacology.

[21]  J. Geoffroy,et al.  Compression characteristics of binary mixtures , 1990 .

[22]  P. Wray.  The Physics of Tablet Compaction Revisited , 1992 .