Understanding and Interpreting Urban Space (in)formation

This paper introduces a novel approach to understanding the complex information and logics of urban spaces by the non-professional public. A model for Interpretation of Qualities in Urban Space (aMIQUS) is proposed. The objectives are threefold: first, to form common, valid and applicable measures to assess features of space design; second, to indicate the developmental trait that considerably affect users' spatial experience which - taken as a consequence - derives from either sustainable/prudent or poor design decisions; and third, to generically recreate and visually represent urban spaces for communicative purposes. The model represents an identification method, not a problem-solving mechanism and is intended as a pragmatic instrument for recognizing crucial information, narrative, embedded in spatial scene. Model is followed by the initial idea to extend it in terms of an educational digital interface for the general public, participating in the process of urban decision-making. The paper concisely summarizes both theoretical and applicative efforts.

[1]  J. Jacobs The Death and Life of Great American Cities , 1962 .

[2]  Murray Silverstein,et al.  A Pattern Language , 1977 .

[3]  P. Wesley Schultz,et al.  Values and their Relationship to Environmental Concern and Conservation Behavior , 2005 .

[4]  Jan Gehl,et al.  Life Between Buildings: Using Public Space , 2003 .

[5]  D. Bole,et al.  Integrated Planning of Public Passenger Transport between the City and the Region: The Case of Ljubljana , 2012 .

[6]  Kevin Lynch,et al.  The Image of the City , 1960 .

[7]  Gordon Cullen The Concise Townscape , 1971 .

[8]  Tadeja Zupancic,et al.  How Children Come to Understand Sustainable Development: A Contribution to Educational Agenda , 2013 .

[9]  Ann Forsyth,et al.  Six Assessments of the Same Places: Comparing Views of Urban Design , 2010 .

[10]  B. Saelens,et al.  Built environment correlates of walking: a review. , 2008, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[11]  Ina Wagner,et al.  Connecting Qualities of Social Use with Spatial Qualities , 1998, CoBuild.

[12]  José Ripper Kós,et al.  The City that Doesn't Exist: Multimedia Reconstruction of Latin American Cities , 2000, IEEE Multim..

[13]  Susan L Handy,et al.  Measuring the Unmeasurable: Urban Design Qualities Related to Walkability , 2009 .

[14]  S. King,et al.  Co-Design: A Process of Design Participation , 1989 .

[15]  Amos Rapoport,et al.  The Study of Spatial Quality. , 1970 .

[16]  Heinrich H. Bülthoff,et al.  Predicting experiential qualities of architecture by its spatial properties , 2005 .

[17]  S. Hartmann,et al.  Models in Science , 2006 .

[18]  N. Dempsey,et al.  The social dimension of sustainable development: Defining urban social sustainability , 2011 .

[19]  H. Frumkin Healthy places: exploring the evidence. , 2003, American journal of public health.

[20]  Y. Tuan,et al.  Place: An Experiential Perspective , 1975 .

[21]  S. Saegert,et al.  An ecological perspective on theory, methods, and analysis in environmental psychology: Advances and challenges , 2009 .

[22]  Paul M. Torrens,et al.  Visualizing the City: Communicating Urban Design to Planners and Decision-Makers , 2001 .