An energy future beyond climate neutrality: Comprehensive evaluations of transition pathways

[1]  S. Pfenninger,et al.  Diversity of options to eliminate fossil fuels and reach carbon neutrality across the entire European energy system , 2022, Joule.

[2]  A. Bardow,et al.  SecMOD: An Open-Source Modular Framework Combining Multi-Sector System Optimization and Life-Cycle Assessment , 2022, Frontiers in Energy Research.

[3]  N. Martin,et al.  Overlooked factors in predicting the transition to clean electricity , 2022, Environmental Research: Infrastructure and Sustainability.

[4]  G. Luderer,et al.  PRospective EnvironMental Impact asSEment (premise): a streamlined approach to producing databases for prospective Life Cycle Assessment using Integrated Assessment Models , 2022, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.

[5]  Sebastian Rauner,et al.  Life-cycle impacts from different decarbonization pathways for the European car fleet , 2022, Environmental Research Letters.

[6]  Laura Talens Peiró,et al.  Integration of raw materials indicators of energy technologies into energy system models , 2021, Applied Energy.

[7]  Johan Lilliestam,et al.  Better suited or just more complex? On the fit between user needs and modeller-driven improvements of energy system models , 2021, Energy.

[8]  D. Iribarren,et al.  Comparative life cycle sustainability assessment of renewable and conventional hydrogen. , 2020, The Science of the total environment.

[9]  S. Simon,et al.  Environmental Sustainability Assessment of Multi-Sectoral Energy Transformation Pathways: Methodological Approach and Case Study for Germany , 2020, Sustainability.

[10]  J. Owen,et al.  The social and environmental complexities of extracting energy transition metals , 2020, Nature Communications.

[11]  Stefano Marelli,et al.  Trade-Offs between Geographic Scale, Cost, and Infrastructure Requirements for Fully Renewable Electricity in Europe , 2020, Joule.

[12]  R. Ii,et al.  Toward more comprehensive environmental impact assessments: interlinked global models of LCIA and IAM applicable to this century , 2020, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[13]  C. Breyer,et al.  Job creation during the global energy transition towards 100% renewable power system by 2050 , 2020 .

[14]  E. Hertwich,et al.  Environmental co-benefits and adverse side-effects of alternative power sector decarbonization strategies , 2019, Nature Communications.

[15]  Louisa Jane Di Felice,et al.  An alternative to market-oriented energy models: Nexus patterns across hierarchical levels , 2019, Energy Policy.

[16]  Jeroen B. Guinée,et al.  When the Background Matters: Using Scenarios from Integrated Assessment Models in Prospective Life Cycle Assessment , 2018, Journal of Industrial Ecology.

[17]  Mario Giampietro,et al.  The metabolism of oil extraction: A bottom-up approach applied to the case of Ecuador , 2018, Energy Policy.

[18]  Stefan Pfenninger,et al.  Calliope: a multi-scale energy systems modelling framework , 2018, J. Open Source Softw..

[19]  M. Giampietro.  Perception and Representation of the Resource Nexus at the Interface between Society and the Natural Environment , 2018, Sustainability.

[20]  A. Tillman,et al.  Environmental Assessment of Emerging Technologies: Recommendations for Prospective LCA , 2018, Journal of Industrial Ecology.

[21]  E. Hertwich,et al.  Understanding future emissions from low-carbon power systems by integration of life-cycle assessment and integrated energy modelling , 2017 .

[22]  Mark A. J. Huijbregts,et al.  ReCiPe2016: a harmonised life cycle impact assessment method at midpoint and endpoint level , 2016, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[23]  Richard Wood,et al.  A Methodology for Integrated, Multiregional Life Cycle Assessment Scenarios under Large-Scale Technological Change. , 2015, Environmental science & technology.

[24]  E. Hertwich,et al.  Integrated life-cycle assessment of electricity-supply scenarios confirms global environmental benefit of low-carbon technologies , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[25]  Ulla Mörtberg,et al.  Energy models from a strategic environmental assessment perspective in an EU context: What is missing concerning renewables? , 2014 .

[26]  Mario Giampietro,et al.  Multi-scale integrated analysis of societal and ecosystem metabolism (MuSIASEM): Theoretical concepts and basic rationale , 2009 .

[27]  Reginald B. H. Tan,et al.  The New International Standards for Life Cycle Assessment: ISO 14040 and ISO 14044 , 2006 .

[28]  Mario Giampietro,et al.  Multiple-Scale Integrated Assessment of Societal Metabolism: Introducing the Approach , 2000 .

[29]  Mario Giampietro,et al.  Multiple-Scale Integrated Assessments of Societal Metabolism: Integrating Biophysical and Economic Representations Across Scales , 2000 .

[30]  Mario Giampietro,et al.  A dynamic model of socioeconomic systems based on hierarchy theory and its application to sustainability , 1997 .

[31]  Alexis Laurent,et al.  LCA of Energy Systems , 2018 .

[32]  Ralph K. Rosenbaum,et al.  Overview of Existing LCIA Methods—Annex to Chapter 10 , 2018 .

[33]  Edgar G. Hertwich,et al.  Deriving life cycle assessment coefficients for application in integrated assessment modelling , 2018, Environ. Model. Softw..