Intrapartum Care and Experiences of Women with Midwives Versus Obstetricians in the Listening to Mothers in California Survey

Introduction Many studies based on hospital records or vital statistics have found that childbearing women experience benefits of lower rates of intervention with midwifery care versus obstetric care during labor and birth. Surveys of women's views and experiences can provide a richer analysis when comparing intrapartum care of midwives and obstetricians. Methods This study was a secondary analysis of data from the population‐based Listening to Mothers in California survey. The sample, which was representative of 2016 California hospital births, was drawn from birth certificate files and oversampled midwife‐attended births. Women responded to the survey in English or Spanish on any device or with a telephone interviewer. The present analysis is based on 1421 of the 2539 participants who identified a midwife or obstetrician as their attendant at a vaginal birth. A bivariate analysis of demographic, attitudinal, and intrapartum variables was conducted. A multivariable model included sociodemographic and attitudinal variables as covariates. Results Bivariate analyses found significant socioeconomic differences by type of intrapartum care provider, with women in California attended by midwives more likely to be well educated and privately insured than women attended by obstetricians. Women with midwife birth attendants were less likely to report experiencing various intrapartum medical interventions, less likely to experience pressure to have epidural analgesia, and more likely to report that staff encouraged the woman's decision making. Adjusted odds ratios found that women with midwives were less likely to experience medical interventions, including attempted labor induction; labor augmentation; and use of pain medications, epidural analgesia, and intravenous fluids; and less likely to report pressure to have labor induction or epidural analgesia. Women cared for by midwives were more likely to experience any nonpharmacologic pain relief measures and nitrous oxide and to agree that hospital staff encouraged their decision making. Discussion Using women's own reports of their care experiences and adjusting for possible differences in women's attitudes and case mix, we found that midwifery care of women who had vaginal births was associated with reduced use of medical interventions and increased women's decisional latitude during labor and birth.

[1]  Susan L. Perez,et al.  Measuring labor and delivery unit culture and clinicians' attitudes toward birth: Revision and validation of the Labor Culture Survey. , 2018, Birth.

[2]  Julia C Phillippi,et al.  Midwifery presence in United States medical centers and labor care and birth outcomes among low-risk nulliparous women: A Consortium on Safe Labor study. , 2018, Birth.

[3]  Julia C Phillippi,et al.  Influence of midwifery presence in United States centers on labor care and outcomes of low-risk parous women: A Consortium on Safe Labor study. , 2018, Birth.

[4]  M. Klebanoff,et al.  Birth Outcomes of Women Using a Midwife versus Women Using a Physician for Prenatal Care , 2018, Journal of midwifery & women's health.

[5]  N. Lowe,et al.  Association between provider type and cesarean birth in healthy nulliparous laboring women: A retrospective cohort study , 2018, Birth.

[6]  Timothy Fisher,et al.  Mapping integration of midwives across the United States: Impact on access, equity, and outcomes , 2018, PloS one.

[7]  K. Kozhimannil,et al.  Relationship Between Hospital‐Level Percentage of Midwife‐Attended Births and Obstetric Procedure Utilization , 2018, Journal of midwifery & women's health.

[8]  Neel T Shah,et al.  Relationship Between Labor and Delivery Unit Management Practices and Maternal Outcomes. , 2017, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[9]  K. Keenan,et al.  Concordance between maternal recall of birth complications and data from obstetrical records. , 2017, Early human development.

[10]  K. Kozhimannil,et al.  Midwifery Care and Patient–Provider Communication in Maternity Decisions in the United States , 2015, Maternal and Child Health Journal.

[11]  A. Malata,et al.  Midwifery and quality care: findings from a new evidence-informed framework for maternal and newborn care , 2014, The Lancet.

[12]  M. Cheyney,et al.  Outcomes of care for 16,924 planned home births in the United States: the Midwives Alliance of North America Statistics Project, 2004 to 2009. , 2014, Journal of midwifery & women's health.

[13]  D. Devane,et al.  Midwife-led continuity models versus other models of care for childbearing women. , 2016, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[14]  J. Illuzzi,et al.  Outcomes of care in birth centers: demonstration of a durable model. , 2013, Journal of midwifery & women's health.

[15]  K. Kozhimannil,et al.  Recent trends in clinicians providing care to pregnant women in the United States. , 2012, Journal of midwifery & women's health.

[16]  D. Devane,et al.  A Metasynthesis of Midwife-Led Care , 2012, Qualitative health research.

[17]  M. Johantgen,et al.  Comparison of labor and delivery care provided by certified nurse-midwives and physicians: a systematic review, 1990 to 2008. , 2012, Women's health issues : official publication of the Jacobs Institute of Women's Health.

[18]  Robert K. Gable,et al.  Posttraumatic stress disorder in new mothers: results from a two-stage U.S. national survey. , 2011, Birth.

[19]  P. Bracke,et al.  Pregnant Women's Fear of Childbirth in Midwife- and Obstetrician-Led Care in Belgium and the Netherlands: Test of the Medicalization Hypothesis , 2011, Women & health.

[20]  S. Verloove-vanhorick,et al.  Evaluation of 280,000 cases in Dutch midwifery practices: a descriptive study. , 2008, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[21]  S. Verloove-vanhorick,et al.  Evaluation of 280 000 cases in Dutch midwifery practices: a descriptive study , 2007 .

[22]  S. Lederman,et al.  Maternal Reporting of Prepregnancy Weight and Birth Outcome: Consistency and Completeness Compared with the Clinical Record , 1998, Maternal and Child Health Journal.

[23]  C S Berkey,et al.  Reproducibility and validity of maternal recall of pregnancy-related events. , 1999, Epidemiology.

[24]  B. Yawn,et al.  Maternal recall of distant pregnancy events. , 1998, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[25]  Gopal K Singh,et al.  Midwifery care, social and medical risk factors, and birth outcomes in the USA. , 1998, Journal of epidemiology and community health.