Understanding Collective Cognitive Convergence

When a set of people interact frequently with one another, they often grow to think more and more along the same lines, a phenomenon we call "collective cognitive convergence" (C3). We discuss instances of C3 and why it is advantageous or disadvantageous; review previous work in sociology, computational social science, and evolutionary biology that sheds light on C3; define a computational model for the convergence process and quantitative metrics that can be used to study it; report on experiments with this model and metric; and suggest how the insights from this model can inspire techniques for managing C3.

[1]  R. Axelrod The Dissemination of Culture , 1997 .

[2]  H. Van Dyke Parunak,et al.  A mathematical analysis of collective cognitive convergence , 2009, AAMAS.

[3]  Guillaume Deffuant,et al.  Mixing beliefs among interacting agents , 2000, Adv. Complex Syst..

[4]  R Hilscher,et al.  Agent based models of competitive speciation. , 2005 .

[5]  Xavier Raynaud,et al.  Plants May Alter Competition by Modifying Nutrient Bioavailability in Rhizosphere: A Modeling Approach , 2007, The American Naturalist.

[6]  A. Rbnyi ON THE EVOLUTION OF RANDOM GRAPHS , 2001 .

[7]  Joachim Hermisson,et al.  An Analytically Tractable Model for Competitive Speciation , 2007, The American Naturalist.

[8]  U. Krause A DISCRETE NONLINEAR AND NON–AUTONOMOUS MODEL OF CONSENSUS FORMATION , 2007 .

[9]  R. Punnett,et al.  The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection , 1930, Nature.

[10]  S. Boissinot,et al.  Evolutionary Biology , 2000, Evolutionary Biology.

[11]  H. Van Dyke Parunak,et al.  Global convergence of local agent behaviors , 2005, AAMAS '05.

[12]  J. French,et al.  A formal theory of social power. , 1956, Psychological review.

[13]  B. Bollobás The evolution of random graphs , 1984 .

[14]  John Yen,et al.  Emergent Information Technologies and Enabling Policies for Counter-Terrorism (IEEE Press Series on Computational Intelligence) , 2006 .

[15]  S. Page,et al.  Conformity , Consistency , and Cultural Heterogeneity , 2006 .

[16]  Andreas Flache,et al.  What sustains cultural diversity and what undermines it? Axelrod and beyond , 2006 .

[17]  R. Meldola Sexual Selection , 1871, Nature.

[18]  W. Batchelder,et al.  Culture as Consensus: A Theory of Culture and Informant Accuracy , 1986 .

[19]  Katarzyna Sznajd-Weron,et al.  Opinion evolution in closed community , 2000, cond-mat/0101130.

[20]  B. Derrida,et al.  Stochastic models for species formation in evolving populations , 1991 .

[21]  P. Erdos,et al.  On the evolution of random graphs , 1984 .

[22]  A. Barabasi,et al.  Quantifying social group evolution , 2007, Nature.

[23]  Chang Yun-feng,et al.  The evolution of opinions on scale-free networks , 2006 .

[24]  David Elliott,et al.  In the Wild , 2010 .

[25]  H. Van Dyke Parunak,et al.  Modeling and managing collective cognitive convergence , 2008, AAMAS.

[26]  D. Hartl,et al.  Principles of population genetics , 1981 .

[27]  C. Sunstein The Law of Group Polarization , 1999, How Change Happens.

[28]  Jody Hey,et al.  Principles of population genetics (2nd edn) , 1989 .

[29]  Rainer Hegselmann,et al.  Opinion dynamics and bounded confidence: models, analysis and simulation , 2002, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul..

[30]  W. Provine Sewall Wright and evolutionary biology , 1987 .

[31]  Clifford Behrens,et al.  Schemer: Consensus-Based Knowledge Validation and Collaboration Services for Virtual Teams of Intelligence Experts , 2006, Emergent Information Technologies and Enabling Policies for Counter-Terrorism.