Population Pharmacokinetics

The application of population approaches to drug development is recommended in several US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) guidance documents. Population pharmacokinetic (and pharmacodynamic) techniques enable identification of the sources of inter- and intra-individual variability that impinge upon drug safety and efficacy. This article briefly discusses the 2-stage approach to the estimation of population pharmacokinetic parameters, which requires serial multiple measurements on each participant, and comprehensively reviews the nonlinear mixed-effects modelling approach, which can be applied in situations where extensive sampling is not done on all or any of the participants.Certain preliminary information, such as the compartment model used in describing the pharmacokinetics of the drug, is required for a population pharmacokinetic study. The practical design considerations of the location of sampling times, number of samples/participants and the need to sample an individual more than once should be borne in mind. Simulation may be useful for choosing the study design that will best meet study objectives.The objectives of the population pharmacokinetic study can be secondary to the objectives of the primary clinical study (in which case an add-on population pharmacokinetic protocol may be needed) or primary (when a stand-alone protocol is required). Having protocols for population pharmacokinetic studies is an integral part of ‘good pharmacometric practice’.Real-time data assembly and analysis permit an ongoing evaluation of site compliance with the study protocol and provide the opportunity to correct violations of study procedures. Adequate policies and procedures should be in place for study blind maintenance. Real-time data assembly creates the opportunity for detecting and correcting errors in concentration-time data, drug administration history and covariate data.Population pharmacokinetic analyses may be undertaken in 3 interwoven steps: exploratory data analysis, model development and model validation (i.e. predictive performance). Documentation for regulatory purposes should include a complete inventory of key runs in the analyses undertaken (with flow diagrams if possible), accompanied by articulation of objectives, assumptions and hypotheses. Use of diagnostic analyses of goodness of fit as evidence of reliability of results is advised. Finally, the use of stability testing or model validation may be warranted to support label claims.The opinions expressed in this article were revised by incorporating comments from various sources and published by the FDA as ‘Guidance for Industry: Population Pharmacokinetics’ (see the FDA home page http://www.fda.gov for further information).

[1]  E. Ette,et al.  Statistical Graphics in Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics: A Tutorial , 1998, The Annals of pharmacotherapy.

[2]  J. Wakefield The Bayesian Analysis of Population Pharmacokinetic Models , 1996 .

[3]  E. Ette,et al.  Designing Cross-Sectional Population Pharmacokinetic Studies: Implications for Pediatric and Animal Studies , 1996 .

[4]  L B Sheiner,et al.  Premarketing observational studies of population pharmacokinetics of new drugs , 1985, Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.

[5]  Opportunities for integration of pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and toxicokinetics in rational drug development , 1992 .

[6]  D. Rubin INFERENCE AND MISSING DATA , 1975 .

[7]  J F Boisvieux,et al.  Alternative approaches to estimation of population pharmacokinetic parameters: comparison with the nonlinear mixed-effect model. , 1984, Drug metabolism reviews.

[8]  L Aarons,et al.  Population pharmacokinetics: theory and practice. , 1991, British journal of clinical pharmacology.

[9]  B. Efron Estimating the Error Rate of a Prediction Rule: Improvement on Cross-Validation , 1983 .

[10]  E. Ette,et al.  Ignorability and Parameter Estimation in Longitudinal Pharmacokinetic Studies , 1998, Journal of clinical pharmacology.

[11]  R Temple The clinical investigation of drugs for use by the elderly: Food and Drug guidelines , 1987, Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.

[12]  E. Ette,et al.  Stability and Performance of a Population Pharmacokinetic Model , 1997, Journal of clinical pharmacology.

[13]  A. Mallet A maximum likelihood estimation method for random coefficient regression models , 1986 .

[14]  A W Kelman,et al.  Population Pharmacokinetics Theory and Clinical Application , 1986, Clinical pharmacokinetics.

[15]  E. Samara,et al.  Role of Population Pharmacokinetics in Drug Development , 1997, Clinical pharmacokinetics.

[16]  L B Sheiner,et al.  Estimating population kinetics. , 1982, Critical reviews in biomedical engineering.

[17]  Marie Davidian,et al.  A Two-Step Approach to Measurement Error in Time-Dependent Covariates in Nonlinear Mixed-Effects Models, with Application to IGF-I Pharmacokinetics , 1997 .

[18]  E. Capparelli,et al.  Direct Comparison of Three Methods For Predicting Digoxin Concentrations , 1996, Pharmacotherapy.

[19]  G Levy,et al.  What are narrow therapeutic index drugs? , 1998, Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.

[20]  L B Sheiner,et al.  Learning versus confirming in clinical drug development , 1997, Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.

[21]  L B Sheiner,et al.  A new method to explore the distribution of interindividual random effects in non-linear mixed effects models. , 1995, Biometrics.

[22]  France Mentré,et al.  The Use of Population Pharmacokinetics in Drug Development , 1996, Clinical pharmacokinetics.