Impact of Load Profile on Dynamic Interactions Between Energy Markets: A Case Study of Power Exchange and Demand Response Exchange

Demand response exchange (DRX) presents a pool-based approach for optimal clearing/scheduling of demand response (DR) services through bid clearing. The same is intended to minimize the limitations of price-based and incentive-based mechanisms. However, unlike the price-based or incentive-based DR schemes, the DR sellers in DRX do not have a clear motivation to formulate the bid offers. Similarly, the DR buyers’ bid formulation should also include optimal benefit analysis. This paper formulates and analyzes the bid formulation for DR sellers and buyers considering respective operation objectives. The DR seller bid formulation is derived considering load behavior through utilization index and availability index obtained from load profile of respective loads. On the other hand, DR buyer bid formulation is derived from power exchange operation attributes/cost of generation. Therefore, the DR clearing ultimately affects the operational cost of operation which, in turn, is reflected in DR buying bid and DR clearing finally. This paper develops an iterative approach in which the continuous interactions between ISO/power exchange would finally converge to a stable operation. The load profile-based strategic bid formulation is modeled using mathematical as well as fuzzy inference system (FIS). In addition, an adaptive FIS has been devised to improve the performance of DR scheduling. The simulation results illustrate the impact of customer behavior, intelligent decision-making, and penetration level on the performance and convergence of power markets (DRX and power exchange).

[1]  Nguyen Hieu Trung,et al.  Bidding strategy for virtual power plant with intraday demand response exchange market using stochastic programming , 2016 .

[2]  Masood Parvania,et al.  Demand Response Scheduling by Stochastic SCUC , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[3]  Danny H. K. Tsang,et al.  Integrating Price Responsive Demand Into the Unit Commitment Problem , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[4]  M. Shafie-khah,et al.  Simultaneous participation of Demand Response aggregators in ancillary services and Demand Response eXchange markets , 2016, 2016 IEEE/PES Transmission and Distribution Conference and Exposition (T&D).

[5]  João P. S. Catalão,et al.  Strategic Offering for a Price-Maker Wind Power Producer in Oligopoly Markets Considering Demand Response Exchange , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics.

[6]  M. Sohn,et al.  Grid Integration of Aggregated Demand Response, Part 1: Load Availability Profiles and Constraints for the Western Interconnection , 2014 .

[7]  Siamak Arzanpour,et al.  A fuzzy logic system for demand-side load management in residential buildings , 2014, 2014 IEEE 27th Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering (CCECE).

[8]  Lei Wu,et al.  Impact of price-based demand response on market clearing and locational marginal prices , 2013 .

[9]  P. G. Lowery,et al.  Generating Unit Commitment by Dynamic Programming , 1966 .

[10]  Víctor Manuel Fernandes Mendes,et al.  A fuzzy clustering approach to a demand response model , 2016 .

[11]  Mohammad Kazem Sheikh-El-Eslami,et al.  Investigation of Economic and Environmental-Driven Demand Response Measures Incorporating UC , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[12]  Mohammad Shahidehpour,et al.  SCUC With Hourly Demand Response Considering Intertemporal Load Characteristics , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[13]  Rajesh Kumar,et al.  Investigating the Impact of Load Profile Attributes on Demand Response Exchange , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics.

[14]  Rainer Storn,et al.  Differential Evolution – A Simple and Efficient Heuristic for global Optimization over Continuous Spaces , 1997, J. Glob. Optim..

[15]  Nemer A. Amleh,et al.  Optimal demand response bidding and pricing mechanism with fuzzy optimization: Application for a virtual power plant , 2017, 2016 Clemson University Power Systems Conference (PSC).

[16]  Rajesh Kumar,et al.  Modeling of Carbon Capture Technology Attributes for Unit Commitment in Emission-Constrained Environment , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[17]  Alireza Soroudi,et al.  Simultanous emergency demand response programming and unit commitment programming in comparison with interruptible load contracts , 2012 .

[18]  Russell C. Eberhart,et al.  A new optimizer using particle swarm theory , 1995, MHS'95. Proceedings of the Sixth International Symposium on Micro Machine and Human Science.

[19]  Lei Wu,et al.  Convergence of Volatile Power Markets With Price-Based Demand Response , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[20]  Abdullah Abusorrah,et al.  Demand Response Exchange in the Stochastic Day-Ahead Scheduling With Variable Renewable Generation , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy.

[21]  Jamshid Aghaei,et al.  Robust n–k contingency constrained unit commitment with ancillary service demand response program , 2014 .

[22]  Hossein Nezamabadi-pour,et al.  GSA: A Gravitational Search Algorithm , 2009, Inf. Sci..

[23]  Ming Zeng,et al.  An Incentivized Auction-Based Group-Selling Approach for Demand Response Management in V2G Systems , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics.

[24]  Yongpei Guan,et al.  Stochastic Unit Commitment With Uncertain Demand Response , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[25]  M. Shahidehpour,et al.  Allocation of Hourly Reserve Versus Demand Response for Security-Constrained Scheduling of Stochastic Wind Energy , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy.

[26]  Andrew Lewis,et al.  Grey Wolf Optimizer , 2014, Adv. Eng. Softw..