Corrective Processes in Grasping After Perturbations of Object Size

Researchers proposed that humans may achieve grip adaptation to a new object size by reprogramming and substituting the initially planned motor program. The authors investigated corrective processes in grasping by using a size perturbation paradigm. In 3 experiments, they investigated how grip adjustments are influenced by different perturbation times (early or late), the visibility of the moving hand, and different perturbation sizes (small or large). Results indicated that individuals execute corrections faster after late perturbations. The availability of visual information about the hand had minimal effect on the corrections, suggesting that feedforward mechanisms are involved. Moreover, participants achieved adjustments mainly by smooth changes of the aperture over time, contradicting the researchers' assumption that a new movement is programmed and superimposed.

[1]  Driss Boussaoud,et al.  Prehension movements in the macaque monkey: effects of perturbation of object size and location , 2006, Experimental Brain Research.

[2]  O. Bock,et al.  The coordination of hand transport and grasp formation during single- and double-perturbed human prehension movements , 2002, Experimental Brain Research.

[3]  S. Vogt,et al.  Vision of the hand and environmental context in human prehension , 2000, Experimental Brain Research.

[4]  M. A. Goodale,et al.  Factors affecting higher-order movement planning: a kinematic analysis of human prehension , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[5]  K. Gegenfurtner,et al.  Illusion effects on grasping are temporally constant not dynamic. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[6]  M. A. Goodale,et al.  The role of visual feedback of hand position in the control of manual prehension , 1999, Experimental Brain Research.

[7]  L. Carlton Processing visual feedback information for movement control. , 1981, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[8]  C. Prablanc,et al.  Large adjustments in visually guided reaching do not depend on vision of the hand or perception of target displacement , 1986, Nature.

[9]  Christine L. MacKenzie,et al.  Functional relationships between grasp and transport components in a prehension task , 1990 .

[10]  A. Wing,et al.  Grasp size and accuracy of approach in reaching. , 1986, Journal of motor behavior.

[11]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  Virtual lesions of the anterior intraparietal area disrupt goal-dependent on-line adjustments of grasp , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[12]  Mitsuo Kawato,et al.  Internal models for motor control and trajectory planning , 1999, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[13]  J. T. Massey,et al.  Spatial trajectories and reaction times of aimed movements: effects of practice, uncertainty, and change in target location. , 1981, Journal of neurophysiology.

[14]  M. Gentilucci,et al.  Temporal coupling between transport and grasp components during prehension movements: effects of visual perturbation , 1992, Behavioural Brain Research.

[15]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  Beyond grasping: Representation of action in human anterior intraparietal sulcus , 2007, NeuroImage.

[16]  V. Gullapalli,et al.  Visual Information and Object Size in the Control of Reaching. , 1996, Journal of motor behavior.

[17]  Marco Santello,et al.  Patterns of Hand Motion during Grasping and the Influence of Sensory Guidance , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[18]  M. Jeannerod,et al.  Selective perturbation of visual input during prehension movements , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[19]  Jeroen B J Smeets,et al.  Modeling the time-dependent effect of the Ebbinghaus illusion on grasping. , 2003, Spatial vision.

[20]  W D Beggs,et al.  The accuracy of aiming at a target. Some further evidence for a theory of intermittent control. , 1972, Acta psychologica.

[21]  D. Elliott,et al.  Visual regulation of manual aiming , 1993 .

[22]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  Functional Anatomy of Nonvisual Feedback Loops during Reaching: A Positron Emission Tomography Study , 2001, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[23]  Luis F. Schettino,et al.  Effects of object shape and visual feedback on hand configuration during grasping , 2003, Experimental Brain Research.

[24]  E. Komilis,et al.  Error processing in pointing at randomly feedback-induced double-step stimuli. , 1993, Journal of motor behavior.

[25]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  A lesion of the posterior parietal cortex disrupts on-line adjustments during aiming movements , 2002, Neuropsychologia.

[26]  C. Prablanc,et al.  Automatic control during hand reaching at undetected two-dimensional target displacements. , 1992, Journal of neurophysiology.

[27]  U. Castiello,et al.  Reach to grasp: the response to a simultaneous perturbation of object position and size , 1998, Experimental Brain Research.

[28]  O. Bock,et al.  Reprogramming of grip aperture in a double-step virtual grasping paradigm , 1999, Experimental Brain Research.

[29]  M. Desmurget,et al.  An ‘automatic pilot’ for the hand in human posterior parietal cortex: toward reinterpreting optic ataxia , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[30]  Romeo Chua,et al.  On-line control of rapid aiming movements: Unexpected target perturbations and movement kinematics. , 1998 .

[31]  M. Santello,et al.  The role of vision on hand preshaping during reach to grasp , 2003, Experimental Brain Research.

[32]  Robert Sessions Woodworth,et al.  THE ACCURACY OF VOLUNTARY MOVEMENT , 1899 .

[33]  C. Hesse,et al.  Memory mechanisms in grasping , 2009, Neuropsychologia.

[34]  S. Geisser,et al.  On methods in the analysis of profile data , 1959 .

[35]  J. Saunders,et al.  Humans use continuous visual feedback from the hand to control fast reaching movements , 2003, Experimental Brain Research.

[36]  M. Jeannerod Intersegmental coordination during reaching at natural visual objects , 1981 .

[37]  D. Wolpert,et al.  Internal models in the cerebellum , 1998, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[38]  M. Goodale,et al.  Visual control of reaching movements without vision of the limb , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[39]  M. Jeannerod The timing of natural prehension movements. , 1984, Journal of motor behavior.

[40]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  Role of the posterior parietal cortex in updating reaching movements to a visual target , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[41]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[42]  E. Brenner,et al.  A new view on grasping. , 1999, Motor control.

[43]  Michael I. Jordan,et al.  An internal model for sensorimotor integration. , 1995, Science.

[44]  M. Posner,et al.  Processing of visual feedback in rapid movements. , 1968, Journal of experimental psychology.

[45]  D G Pelli,et al.  The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[46]  J. F. Soechting,et al.  Modification of trajectory of a pointing movement in response to a change in target location. , 1983, Journal of neurophysiology.

[47]  Matthew F. S. Rushworth,et al.  Parietal rTMS Disrupts the Initiation but not the Execution of On-line Adjustments to a Perturbation of Object Size , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[48]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  Forward modeling allows feedback control for fast reaching movements , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[49]  U. Castiello,et al.  Reach to grasp: the natural response to perturbation of object size , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[50]  Réjean Plamondon,et al.  A kinematic theory of rapid human movements , 1995, Biological Cybernetics.