Modeling of interference fits taking form defects of the surfaces in contact into account

Abstract The technique of assembly by shrink fit is increasingly used today. However, the methodology of parts sizing has not changed in 50 years. Assembled parts are assumed to have accurate dimensions and very low form defects. This has the disadvantage of increasing the cost of parts production. To reduce manufacturing costs, the study of the influence of form defects on the characteristics of assembly strength is essential. Taking default form into account assumes that the tightening (difference between the diameters of the shaft and the bore) is defined. In the case under consideration, the tightening depends locally on the radius. Two definitions of the tightening are proposed: maximum tightening and mean tightening. It is shown that the form defect is not detrimental to the assembly strength: the mean pressures are nearly equivalent to the classical case of surfaces without defects. Various finite element simulations were performed. The influence of the value and the type of defect have been studied for conventional tightening (elastic materials) and more intensive tightening (elasto-plastic behavior) in the case of axisymmetrical and non-axisymmetrical parts. The theoretical results correlate well with those obtained through experiments. However, for intensive tightening, the behavior of the roughness is not negligible.

[1]  Rob Dwyer-Joyce,et al.  Measurement of interface pressure in interference fits , 2005 .

[2]  Dianzhong Li,et al.  Three-dimensional finite element method simulation and optimization of shrink fitting process for a large marine crankshaft , 2010 .

[3]  D. Smith,et al.  Prediction and Measurement of Through Thickness Residual stresses in Large Quenched Components , 2009 .

[4]  Jean-Yves Dantan,et al.  Geometrical product specifications - model for product life cycle , 2008, Comput. Aided Des..

[5]  B. Bhushan Principles and Applications of Tribology , 1999 .

[6]  Sayeed Hossain,et al.  Measurement of Torsionally Induced Shear Stresses in Shrink-Fit Assemblies , 2009 .

[7]  Murat Aydin,et al.  Stress analysis of shrink-fitted joints for various fit forms via finite element method , 2005 .

[8]  Jean-François Fontaine,et al.  Optimization of the contact surface shape of a shrinkage fit , 1998 .

[9]  Necip Fazil Yilmaz,et al.  Shrink fit design for precision gear forging dies , 2009 .

[10]  Jean-François Fontaine,et al.  Form defect influence on the shrinkage fit characteristics , 1998 .

[11]  A. H. Liao,et al.  Numerical simulation of contact problems in vane machinery by a parametric quadratic programming method , 2007 .

[12]  Christopher E Truman,et al.  A comparison of shrink-fit holding torque using probabilistic, micromechanical and experimental approaches , 2004 .

[13]  Dario Croccolo,et al.  Static and dynamic strength evaluation of interference fit and adhesively bonded cylindrical joints , 2010 .

[14]  Bernard Sanschagrin,et al.  Finite element analysis and contact modelling considerations of interference fits for fretting fatigue strength calculations , 2009, Simul. Model. Pract. Theory.

[15]  X. D. Fang,et al.  Design of interference fits via finite element method , 2000 .

[16]  Christopher E Truman,et al.  Analysis of a shrink-fit failure on a gear hub/shaft assembly , 2007 .

[17]  Lucjan Sniezek,et al.  The carrying capacity of conical interference-fit joints with laser reinforcement zones , 2010 .