Policies and institutional and legal frameworks in the expansion of Brazilian biofuels

This paper maps out and analyses the wide range of policies and players that have shaped the phenomenal rise of biofuels in Brazil, drawing comparisons between the ethanol and biodiesel industries. The sugarcane-ethanol sector's expansion has been characterised by distinct waves of regulation and deregulation, heavy private investment and public financing for infrastructure, research and development. Close links with energy and climate change-related policies, the dualfuel car revolution, liberal foreign direct investment policies and fiscal and financial incentives have also played important roles. Questions are being raised about human rights and environmental justice due to poor working conditions, land concentration and displacement of smallholders as well as environmental impacts, especially in South-Central and Northeastern Brazil. The sugarcane-ethanol industry has sought to address these claims through voluntary governance and certification mechanisms. The Brazilian Government has also taken decisive action to forbid sugarcane expansion into sensitive ecosystems. Recent biodiesel feedstock policies aimed at smallholders have delivered substantial savings (US$1 billion/year) by substituting diesel imports, and made progress towards ‘social inclusion'. But these programs have fallen short of targets, as the prevailing feedstock is still soybeans followed by beef tallow, with production and processing still concentrated in the hands of large-scale soybean farmers and cattle ranchers. Despite robust and well-intended environmental, rural development and fiscal policies to support smallholders, some policies are extremely difficult to enforce given structural constraints faced by smallholders and the lack of adequate governance mechanisms.

[1]  R. Rodrigues,et al.  Implicações do cumprimento do Código Florestal vigente na redução de áreas agrícolas: um estudo de caso da produção canavieira no Estado de São Paulo , 2010 .

[2]  Lael Brainard,et al.  Brazil as an Economic Superpower?: Understanding Brazil's Changing Role in the Global Economy , 2009 .

[3]  Werner Doppler,et al.  Bioenergy and sustainable development: The dilemma of food security and climate change in the Brazilian savannah , 2010 .

[4]  J. van de Vooren,et al.  Environmental sustainability of sugarcane ethanol in Brazil. , 2008 .

[5]  William F. Laurance,et al.  Is Oil Palm the Next Emerging Threat to the Amazon? , 2009 .

[6]  Alexandra C Morel,et al.  How will oil palm expansion affect biodiversity? , 2008, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[7]  Bernardo Mançano Fernandes,et al.  Agrofuel policies in Brazil: paradigmatic and territorial disputes , 2010 .

[8]  J. Moreira,et al.  The alcohol program , 1999 .

[9]  I. C. Macedo,et al.  Sugar cane's energy : twelve studies on Brazilian sugar cane agribusiness and its sustainability , 2005 .

[10]  C. Brannstrom,et al.  Compliance and market exclusion in Brazilian agriculture: Analysis and implications for "soft" governance , 2012 .

[11]  K. Giller,et al.  Biofuel, dairy production and beef in Brazil: competing claims on land use in São Paulo state , 2010, The Journal of peasant studies.

[12]  Arnaldo Walter,et al.  A Sustainability Analysis of the Brazilian Ethanol , 2008 .

[13]  Stelvia Matos,et al.  Brazilian biofuels and social exclusion: established and concentrated ethanol versus emerging and dispersed biodiesel , 2009 .

[14]  John Wilkinson,et al.  Biofuels in Brazil: debates and impacts , 2010 .

[15]  Roberto Forns-broggi,et al.  Central do Brasil , 1998 .

[16]  Ricardo Abramovay,et al.  O acesso dos agricultores familiares aos mercados de biodiesel parcerias entre grandes empresas e movimentos sociais , 2007 .