L2 vocabulary learning through multimodal representations

The present study set out to discover how Iranian learners of the English language learn L2 vocabulary through laptop based delivery of multimodal items. To that end, learners were placed into four different short term memory (STM) ability groups, using Visual and Verbal Short Term Memory Test. Upon treatment, they were evaluated on their recognition and recall of vocabulary items. The results indicated that except for low visual and low verbal group, the other three groups treated with vocabulary items with pictorial or written annotations performed significantly better on the tests. The results suggest considering learners’ cognitive styles in teaching vocabulary. © 2011 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

[1]  A. Baddeley Working memory and language: an overview. , 2003, Journal of communication disorders.

[2]  Andrew D. Cohen,et al.  Easifying second language learning , 1981, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[3]  F. Craik Levels of processing: Past, present... and future? , 2002, Memory.

[4]  Gamel O. Wiredu The Reconstruction of Portable Computers: On the Flexibility of Mobile Computing in Mobile Activities , 2005, Designing Ubiquitous Information Environments.

[5]  Richard Mayer,et al.  Multimedia Learning , 2001, Visible Learning Guide to Student Achievement.

[6]  S. Hsi,et al.  A study of user experiences mediated by nomadic web content in a museum , 2003, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[7]  J. Traxler Defining, Discussing and Evaluating Mobile Learning: The moving finger writes and having writ . . . . , 2007 .

[8]  Khalid Al-Seghayer,et al.  THE EFFECT OF MULTIMEDIA ANNOTATION MODES ON L2 VOCABULARY ACQUISITION: A COMPARATIVE STUDY , 2001 .

[9]  Richard C. Atkinson,et al.  Human Memory: A Proposed System and its Control Processes , 1968, Psychology of Learning and Motivation.

[10]  I. S. P. Nation,et al.  Learning Vocabulary in Another Language: Frontmatter , 2001 .

[11]  E. Geva,et al.  Linguistic and Cognitive Correlates of Academic Skills in First and Second Languages , 1993 .

[12]  R. Mayer,et al.  For whom is a picture worth a thousand words? Extensions of a dual-coding theory of multimedia learning. , 1994 .

[13]  A. Paivio Mental Representations: A Dual Coding Approach , 1986 .

[14]  Dorothy M. Chun,et al.  Effects of Multimedia Annotations on Vocabulary Acquisition , 1996 .

[15]  Ofelia R. Nikolova Effects of Students' Participation in Authoring of Multimedia Materials on Student Acquisition of Vocabulary. , 2002 .

[16]  Dorothy E. Leidner,et al.  Research Commentary: Technology-Mediated Learning - A Call for Greater Depth and Breadth of Research , 2001, Inf. Syst. Res..

[17]  Nian-Shing Chen,et al.  EFFECTS OF SHORT-TERM MEMORY AND CONTENT REPRESENTATION TYPE ON MOBILE LANGUAGE LEARNING , 2008 .

[18]  Paul Procter,et al.  Longman Dictionary of Contemporary English , 1978 .

[19]  Hahn-Ming Lee,et al.  Personalized e-learning system using Item Response Theory , 2005, Comput. Educ..

[20]  Mark Sawyer,et al.  L2 Working Memory Capacity and L2 Reading Skill , 1992, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[21]  Insup Taylor,et al.  Psycholinguistics: Learning and Using Language , 1990 .

[22]  J. Sweller COGNITIVE LOAD THEORY, LEARNING DIFFICULTY, AND INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN , 1994 .

[23]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  An area specialized for spatial working memory in human frontal cortex. , 1998, Science.

[24]  Yuhsun Edward Shih,et al.  Setting the New Standard with Mobile Computing in Online Learning , 2007 .

[25]  S. Abu-Rabia The Influence of Working Memory on Reading and Creative Writing Processes in a Second Language , 2003 .