Screening for cutaneous melanoma by skin self-examination.

BACKGROUND Although some evidence indicates that early detection protects against the development of lethal melanoma, no randomized clinical trials have been conducted to measure the efficacy of early detection (or screening) in preventing death from this disease. Since melanoma incidence in the United States is relatively rare, a randomized clinical trial to test the efficacy of screening would be extremely expensive. PURPOSE As an alternative to a randomized clinical trial, we conducted a population-based, case-control study to investigate whether early detection through skin self-examination (SSE) is associated with a decreased risk of lethal melanoma (includes the presence of advanced disease with distant metastases in addition to death from melanoma). METHODS SSE (conducting a careful, deliberate, and purposeful examination of the skin) was assessed in all subjects by use of a structured questionnaire and personal interviews. The major exposure variable, SSE, was defined following focus-group interviews with melanoma patients and healthy control subjects. The final study population consisted of 1199 Caucasian residents of the state of Connecticut enrolled from January 15, 1987, through May 15, 1989; 650 individuals were newly diagnosed with cutaneous melanoma, and the remaining 549 individuals were age- and sex-frequency matched control subjects from the general population. During the study interviews, nevi on the arms and backs of subjects were counted. In 5 years of follow-up (through March 1994), 110 lethal cases of melanoma were identified. The study design allowed separate estimation of the impact of SSE on reduced melanoma incidence (primary prevention) and survival among incident cases (secondary prevention). Odds ratios (ORs) were used to measure the associations between SSE and melanoma and between SSE and lethal melanoma. RESULTS SSE, practiced by only 15% of all subjects, was associated with a reduced risk of melanoma incidence (adjusted OR = 0.66; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.44-0.99; comparing case patients with control subjects). The data indicated further that SSE may reduce the risk of advanced disease among melanoma patients (unadjusted risk ratio = 0.58; 95% CI = 0.31-1.11); however, longer follow-up is required to confirm this latter estimate. If both estimates are correct, they suggest, in combination, that SSE may reduce mortality from melanoma by 63% (adjusted OR = 0.37; 95% CI = 0.16-0.84; comparing lethal cases with general population controls). CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS SSE may provide a useful and inexpensive screening method to reduce the incidence of melanoma. SSE may also reduce the development of advanced disease. The results of this study need to be replicated before strategies to increase the practice of SSE are further developed and promoted.

[1]  A Breslow,et al.  Thickness, Cross‐Sectional Areas and Depth of Invasion in the Prognosis of Cutaneous Melanoma , 1970, Annals of surgery.

[2]  Alan S. Marrison Case definition in case-control studies of the efficacy of screening. , 1982 .

[3]  M. N. Epstein,et al.  A study of tumor progression: the precursor lesions of superficial spreading and nodular melanoma. , 1984, Human pathology.

[4]  A. Kopf,et al.  Early detection of malignant melanoma: The role of physician examination and self‐examination of the skin , 1985, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[5]  B. Harlow,et al.  Two one-step methods for household screening and interviewing using random digit dialing. , 1988, American journal of epidemiology.

[6]  W. Thompson,et al.  Evaluating the efficacy of skin self-exam and other surveillance measures in persons at various levels of risk for cutaneous malignant melanoma: an ongoing case-control study. , 1989, Progress in clinical and biological research.

[7]  P. Prorok,et al.  Statistical considerations in cancer screening programs. , 1990, The Urologic clinics of North America.

[8]  J. Kopec,et al.  Bias in case-control studies. A review. , 1990, Journal of epidemiology and community health.

[9]  H. Seigler,et al.  Late Recurrence of Malignant Melanoma: Analysis of 168 Patients , 1990, Annals of surgery.

[10]  J. Scotto,et al.  Indications of future decreasing trends in skin‐melanoma mortality among whites in the United States , 1991, International journal of cancer.

[11]  A. Girgis,et al.  Screening for melanoma: A community survey of prevalence and predictors , 1991, The Medical journal of Australia.

[12]  R. MacKie,et al.  Audit of public education campaign to encourage earlier detection of malignant melanoma. , 1992, BMJ.

[13]  T. Holford,et al.  A reversal in the long‐term increase in deaths attributable to malignant melanoma , 1992, Cancer.

[14]  N. Martin,et al.  Increasing incidence of cutaneous melanoma in Queensland, Australia. , 1992, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[15]  J. Kelsey,et al.  Evaluation of random digit dialing as a method of control selection in case-control studies. , 1992, American journal of epidemiology.

[16]  R. Lew,et al.  Who discovers melanoma? Patterns from a population-based survey. , 1992, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

[17]  Elwood Jm Recent developments in melanoma epidemiology, 1993. , 1993 .

[18]  R. Setlow,et al.  Wavelengths effective in induction of malignant melanoma. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[19]  B. Armstrong,et al.  How much melanoma is caused by sun exposure? , 1993, Melanoma research.

[20]  N. Weiss,et al.  Application of the case-control method in the evaluation of screening. , 1994, Epidemiologic reviews.

[21]  J. Elwood Screening for Melanoma and Options For-Its Evaluation , 1994, Journal of medical screening.